Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:"Bolshoy Tkhach", Куэста Большого Тхача, Западный Кавказ.jpg

File:"Bolshoy Tkhach", Куэста Большого Тхача, Западный Кавказ.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 17 Nov 2023 at 11:57:37 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:"Bolshoy Tkhach", Куэста Большого Тхача, Западный Кавказ.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:"Bolshoy Tkhach", Куэста Большого Тхача, Западный Кавказ.jpg

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Russia#Southern Federal District
•  Info Cliffs of Mount Bolshoy Tkhach, Adygea. Triassic geology of the Western Caucasus. There is also an alternative: File:Bolshoy Tkhach, Cliffs, Mountains of Adygea, Western Caucasus.jpg. All by -- Argenberg (talk) 11:57, 8 November 2023 (UTC).
•  Support -- Argenberg (talk) 11:57, 8 November 2023 (UTC)
•  Support ★ 19:29, 8 November 2023 (UTC)
  • Per below. ★ 12:36, 14 November 2023 (UTC)
•  Comment Quite interesting to look at, but the highlights are so bright, they're hurting my eyes a little. I wonder whether that was really the best time of day to take that photograph with that much direct sunlight. Secondarily, I feel like I'd prefer to see the tops of what's on the left and right, though I don't actually know how much further up they extend. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:03, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
•  Oppose Highlights too blown out and too harsh contrast. Interesting photo, but not FA material, sorry. --Fernando (talk) 11:19, 9 November 2023 (UTC)

Yes, the light situation in morning daylight is contrasty, which I personally like. I find it fresh and dynamic as opposite to often boring sunset hues. But there are no blown highlights, there are areas of maximum natural luminosity in the cloud and this can hardly be called blown highlights. The luminosity histogram shows the brightest value is only twice as much as the next brightest. This is not even a soft clipping for this type of light, in my view. --Argenberg (talk) 12:59, 9 November 2023 (UTC)

•  Weak oppose per Ikan. --SHB2000 (talk) 20:35, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
•  Oppose thinking same as Ikan as well. It's a decent shot but far from wow. --Jay.Jarosz (talk) 07:35, 11 November 2023 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 13:04, 14 November 2023 (UTC)