Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Cristo Redentor - Rio de Janeiro - 20230321172914.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Cristo Redentor - Rio de Janeiro - 20230321172914.jpg, not featured
[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 13 Nov 2023 at 06:32:52 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Settlements#Brazil
Info created and uploaded by Donatas Dabravolskas, nominated by me. RodRabelo7 (talk) 06:32, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
Support -- RodRabelo7 (talk) 06:32, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
Neutral Kind of nom that would be easier to support than most boring ones over here, but it's a tad overdone. It's of course noisy but that's a tradeoff for having a drone that can be flown over many places. And I believe a more gentle processing would have made it acceptable for here - Benh (talk) 10:08, 4 November 2023 (UTC)- Neutral Tilted Christ. ★ 17:02, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
Oppose Brights are too bright and darks are too dark for this to be an FP, even if the uncorrected perspective is judged to be acceptable (and I think it won't be). -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:28, 5 November 2023 (UTC)
Weak support Absolutely not my cup of tea (melodramatic, overprocessed, etc.). But in the eyes of most people this is probably a great image and much more interesting than any photo I have ever taken (or will take); certainly it would be a hot POTY candidate. The noise is excusable or at least explainable (see Behn’s comment), and the leaning verticals are IMHO not that bad here because we are clearly looking down. So while I wish very much the photo would have been processed with more restraint and taste, I cannot withhold at least a weak support. --Aristeas (talk) 10:27, 6 November 2023 (UTC)- Oppose Very noisy. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 10:46, 6 November 2023 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 2 support, 2 oppose, 2 neutral → not featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 13:44, 13 November 2023 (UTC)
