Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Henry G. Marquand House Conservatory Stained Glass Window.jpg

File:Henry G. Marquand House Conservatory Stained Glass Window.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 1 Sep 2012 at 18:37:43 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Henry G. Marquand House Conservatory Stained Glass Window.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Henry G. Marquand House Conservatory Stained Glass Window.jpg

•  Info designed by Richard Morris Hunt (1827-1895), made by Eugène Stanislas Oudinot (1827-1889), this stained glass window was created for the Henry G. Marquand House Conservatory Window 1883-1884. The window is part of the permanent exhibition of the Museum of the City of New York (Photo, edit, and upload by me) -- PierreSelim (talk) 18:37, 23 August 2012 (UTC)
•  Support -- PierreSelim (talk) 18:37, 23 August 2012 (UTC)
•  Support --JLPC (talk) 21:07, 23 August 2012 (UTC)
•  Support Tomer T (talk) 21:48, 23 August 2012 (UTC)
•  Support --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:41, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
•  Support -- Added category Trompe l'oeil of which it's a wonderfull example. Had me fooled at first glance. Kleuske (talk) 09:30, 24 August 2012 (UTC)

  I wasn't sure if it was considered a Trompe l'oeil. Thanks for improving the Categorization of this file. --PierreSelim (talk) 09:59, 24 August 2012 (UTC)

•  Oppose Huh sorry to oppose again, but any reason we have the cropped and altered version instead of the original one with the complete context? - Benh (talk) 13:26, 24 August 2012 (UTC)

  First don't be sorry, reviews are essential in the FP process otherwise we just !vote without comment. The original one, is the display context of the museum, I decided to only keep the central part of the artwork (the stained glass window) and remove the window which was too distracting because we could see the window of the museum behind. Note that this window was made for another build (which do not exist anymore). May be my choice is not good, but really I don't think we miss so much with this choice. --PierreSelim (talk) 13:49, 24 August 2012 (UTC)

• I think the context amplifies how good the effect is (by giving element for comparing), but I also see your point. Moved my vote to  Neutral after thinking about it again. - Benh (talk) 16:18, 24 August 2012 (UTC)

•  Support The Trompe l'oeil effect is amazing. Yann (talk) 16:05, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
•  Support -- Jkadavoor (Jee) (talk) 06:27, 25 August 2012 (UTC)
•  Support I had supported it without any mental restriction if I had not seen the uncropped picture, but I cannot say I disagree with Benh. However, we have to "judge" what the author chose to show, and it is very good and interesting as it is. Congratulations.--Jebulon (talk) 09:18, 25 August 2012 (UTC)
•  Support: with or without context. --Julian H. (talk/files) 15:20, 25 August 2012 (UTC)
•  Support -- MJJR (talk) 21:06, 25 August 2012 (UTC)
•  Support --Michael Gäbler (talk) 21:36, 29 August 2012 (UTC)
•  Support I didn´t really catch my eye at thumb size but it is great at 100% Poco a poco (talk) 11:03, 31 August 2012 (UTC)
•  Support Albertus teolog (talk) 12:49, 31 August 2012 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 13 support, 0 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 07:32, 2 September 2012 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects