Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Home in Relation to Everything.png

File:Home in Relation to Everything.png, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 8 Jul 2018 at 22:55:19 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Home in Relation to Everything.png Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Home in Relation to Everything.png

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Astronomy
•  Info created and uploaded by RolandWinkler, nominated by Yann (talk) 22:55, 29 June 2018 (UTC)
•  Support Great work, very high educational value, and very well made. -- Yann (talk) 22:55, 29 June 2018 (UTC)
•  Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 08:53, 30 June 2018 (UTC)
•  Support Finally had time to look at it all, it's an extraordinary work, almost too much to take in. Then again it does contain Life, the Universe and Everything. ;) Could be printed on large posters to hang in classrooms. --Cart (talk) 13:43, 30 June 2018 (UTC)

And all extrapolated from one piece of angel-food cake ... Daniel Case (talk) 05:29, 1 July 2018 (UTC)

•  Support Wow! -- KTC (talk) 16:55, 30 June 2018 (UTC)
•  Support per Yann -- P999 (talk) 22:09, 30 June 2018 (UTC)
•  Support --Tozina (talk) 22:23, 30 June 2018 (UTC)
•  Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 04:12, 1 July 2018 (UTC)
•  Support Daniel Case (talk) 05:29, 1 July 2018 (UTC)
•  Support --Schnobby (talk) 07:18, 1 July 2018 (UTC)
•  Support That's maybe a bit too much of information packed into (most of them I don't even understand). And the solar system diagram (mis)leads us into thinking it's to scale because the planets have different sizes (a bit of a shame when author's goal is to make us realise the size of the universe we live in). But it's beautiful. - Benh (talk) 11:21, 1 July 2018 (UTC)

• "Space is big. Really big. You just won’t believe how vastly hugely mindbogglingly big it is. I mean you may think it’s a long way down the road to the chemist’s, but that’s just peanuts to space." --Cart (talk) 17:44, 1 July 2018 (UTC)

• I happen to be reading that book ;) but a French translation only... - Benh (talk) 17:48, 1 July 2018 (UTC)

• Good choice. :) You should try the English original sometime, it has so many word-games that get lost in translation. Like it did in the Swedish version. --Cart (talk) 18:37, 1 July 2018 (UTC)

•  Support --Cayambe (talk) 20:55, 1 July 2018 (UTC)
•  Support HEV Jacopo Werther ^iγ∂ψ=mψ 18:15, 2 July 2018 (UTC)
•  Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:59, 3 July 2018 (UTC)
•  Comment Intended to just support, but 2 questions:
  1. Has anyone checked this for accuracy? We certainly should not be promoting a scientific image if it has incorrect information. I see the file's talk page has a comment from Reaper35 pointing to one piece of incorrect information.
  2. A lot of this image is a derivative of other works hosted on Commons, most prominently by Azcolvin429. Is there a procedure for recognizing our contributors whose work is then combined with others for a FP? — Rhododendrites ^talk |  21:28, 3 July 2018 (UTC)

• Re 2: AFAIK not in any other way than that they and their work is mentioned on the file page like in File:Photomontage (Forggensee Panorama) -2.jpg. The names of the authors should be displayed in a similar way in this file. --Cart (talk) 09:56, 4 July 2018 (UTC)

• I've added the authors to the description. The work by the Commoners was also derived from other files, so I went for what I could find as original authors. --Cart (talk) 10:16, 4 July 2018 (UTC)

•  Support --Llez (talk) 11:36, 4 July 2018 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 14 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 05:45, 5 July 2018 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Non-photographic media/Computer-generated