Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Huacachina Dunes.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 29 Nov 2023 at 17:09:06 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Peru
- Info all by Imehling -- imehling (talk) 17:09, 20 November 2023 (UTC)
- Support -- imehling (talk) 17:09, 20 November 2023 (UTC)
- Support ★ 20:55, 20 November 2023 (UTC)
- Comment I like this photo, but I believe I recall at least one existing FP of this oasis and surrounding dunes that I'd like to compare, and as usual, FP search is not working. As I recall, it was by User:Poco a poco. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:27, 20 November 2023 (UTC)
- You don't need the FP search, you just click on the link to the gallery above [1], and hey presto, you can see both of the photos from the oasis and compare them with this. That's what those gallery links are for. What I don't understand is why we have two so very similar photos of it. --Cart (talk) 00:14, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
- Thank you, and good point, but I think with those two FPs, we probably don't need this one, although it's nice, too. I think it's of FP quality, so I won't oppose. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:38, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
- Is there anything in the guidelines about a limited number of pictures per object? imehling (talk) 16:52, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
- No, but it's commonplace for us to consider whether we need more than x-number of similar photos. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:18, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
- I think the framing is sufficiently different that it can be assessed in its own right. Otherwise this and this would also be duplicates for instance (it's just less obvious because of the difference of exposure). - Benh (talk) 18:13, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
- No, but it's commonplace for us to consider whether we need more than x-number of similar photos. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:18, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
- Thank you, and good point, but I think with those two FPs, we probably don't need this one, although it's nice, too. I think it's of FP quality, so I won't oppose. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:38, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
- You don't need the FP search, you just click on the link to the gallery above [1], and hey presto, you can see both of the photos from the oasis and compare them with this. That's what those gallery links are for. What I don't understand is why we have two so very similar photos of it. --Cart (talk) 00:14, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 19:01, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
- Oppose Dull light, no wow. —kallerna (talk) 07:33, 22 November 2023 (UTC)
- I withdraw my nomination Ok, opinions are obviously divided. --imehling (talk) 17:43, 22 November 2023 (UTC)