Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Hydrochoeris hydrochaeris in Brazil in Petrópolis, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil 09.jpg

File:Hydrochoeris hydrochaeris in Brazil in Petrópolis, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil 09.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 6 Jan 2024 at 00:21:52 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Hydrochoeris hydrochaeris in Brazil in Petrópolis, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil 09.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Hydrochoeris hydrochaeris in Brazil in Petrópolis, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil 09.jpg

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals#Family_:_Caviidae_(Cavies)
•  Info All by -- Wilfredor (talk) 00:21, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
•  Support --Yann (talk) 12:51, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
•  Support ★ 13:06, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
•  Comment This image] was nominated in 2021 and heavily criticized. I am biased, but I far prefer it to this one. Charlesjsharp (talk) 22:11, 28 December 2023 (UTC)

  Thanks Charles, oui!, they are two different images and different criteria should be used, I also prefer my photo that looks almost like a photo studio, the animal even looks like it is posing Wilfredor (talk) 22:27, 28 December 2023 (UTC)

•  Comment Artificial vignetting on both sides? -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:43, 29 December 2023 (UTC)

there is nothing artificial in this photo. You will find the natural vignetting of this lens here--Wilfredor (talk) 03:20, 29 December 2023 (UTC)

Lens vignetting, then? COM:I mentions "Inappropriate vignetting" in the list of common problems (section "Lighting"). Certainly fixable -- Basile Morin (talk) 04:18, 29 December 2023 (UTC)

I applied Lightroom's automatic lens correction, in addition to this, I have no idea how that vignething can be corrected without generating a bleached edge or an effect where details are lost. I accept suggestions on how to correct this. Wilfredor (talk) 04:22, 29 December 2023 (UTC)

Yes, Lightroom has automatic lens correction, but sometimes that correction need a bit of an additional push from the manual vignetting correction. You just have to be careful not to overdo it. You can also use the gradient filter/tool to fine-tune the exposure/shadows/blacks along the borders. --Cart (talk) 11:26, 29 December 2023 (UTC)

 Done Thanks Wilfredor (talk) 12:12, 29 December 2023 (UTC)

Yes, better now. The 2 sides are still a bit dark, but very acceptable in my view -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:05, 30 December 2023 (UTC)

•  Support Looks good now, thanks for fixing it. --Cart (talk) 13:03, 29 December 2023 (UTC)
•  Support Agreed. --Aristeas (talk) 14:54, 29 December 2023 (UTC)
• I still prefer the picture by Charles that I nominated back in 2021, but regardless,  Support, this is FP to me. Cmao20 (talk) 02:17, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
•  Support Good quality and fair composition free of distracting elements -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:05, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
•  Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:33, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
•  Support --Llez (talk) 15:29, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
•  Support --Wieggy (talk) 18:10, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
•  Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 17:10, 31 December 2023 (UTC)
•  Support Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 14:03, 1 January 2024 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 11 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 05:06, 2 January 2024 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Mammals#Family_:_Caviidae_(Cavies)