Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Portrait of Yellow-headed Amazon Parrot.jpg

File:Portrait of Yellow-headed Amazon Parrot.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 31 Jul 2011 at 11:50:08 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Portrait of Yellow-headed Amazon Parrot.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Portrait of Yellow-headed Amazon Parrot.jpg

•  Info created, uploaded and nominated by Jovianeye -- Jovian Eye _talk 11:50, 22 July 2011 (UTC)
•  Support -- Jovian Eye _talk 11:50, 22 July 2011 (UTC)
•  Support —Notyourbroom (talk) 14:24, 22 July 2011 (UTC)
•  Oppose eye oof and overall low sharpness (I think because ISO 1.250), the beak and IMO too much of the head is hidden by the disturbing trunk --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 15:55, 22 July 2011 (UTC)
  •  Question I dont understand what are you referring to by the word "trunk" --Jovian Eye _talk 23:23, 22 July 2011 (UTC)
    • I mean en:Trunk (anatomy), but I don't know how it's called at birds/animals... --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 15:13, 23 July 2011 (UTC)
•  Comment It looks like your camera has a crazy pixel. There's a very saturated green dot, at approx. one inch NorthEast of the eye. It's really easily clonable though. If it's to be featured, the pic should be corrected, and maybe you can focus the eye a little more too. I don't mind the peak not showing completely, the pose looks fine to me, it kinda looks like the parrot is looking over his shoulder. Very human-like. Interesting. --Paolostefano1412 (talk) 17:15, 22 July 2011 (UTC)
  • Fixed and thanks! --Jovian Eye _talk 23:20, 22 July 2011 (UTC)
•  Support - SteGrifo27 (tell me) 19:35, 22 July 2011 (UTC)
•  Info uploaded a slightly more sharper version. Please remember to purge the cache of your web browser. --Jovian Eye _talk 23:20, 22 July 2011 (UTC)
•  Support Agree with Paolostefano1412 about human-like look, and I like it. --Lošmi (talk) 01:08, 23 July 2011 (UTC)
•  Support Tomer T (talk) 21:47, 23 July 2011 (UTC)
•  Support --The High Fin Sperm Whale 07:19, 24 July 2011 (UTC)
•  Oppose Beak unsharp and eye OOF. Also not happy with the crop, but not sure, not having seen the whole bird, how it could have been improved. W.S. 08:55, 24 July 2011 (UTC)
•  Support -- Raghith 16:17, 25 July 2011 (UTC)
•  Oppose small image of low quality too blurred areas --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:06, 25 July 2011 (UTC)
•  Support--H. Krisp (talk) 17:57, 27 July 2011 (UTC)
•  Oppose Not good crop. --Karelj (talk) 18:53, 27 July 2011 (UTC)
•  Support Per above. --Paolo (talk) 18:59, 27 July 2011 (UTC)
•  Support --Tamba52 (talk) 06:38, 30 July 2011 (UTC)
•  Oppose Beak cropped. Much plumage blurred. Snowmanradio (talk) 15:11, 30 July 2011 (UTC)
  •  Comment At 300mm and f/5.6, I dont think one can expect larger depth of field. --Jovian Eye _storm 15:20, 30 July 2011 (UTC)
    • The composition could be better. Perhaps the bird could have been photographed in a different posture that avoided blurred feathers. Snowmanradio (talk) 15:57, 30 July 2011 (UTC)
•  Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 09:50, 31 July 2011 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 11 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Jovian Eye _storm 12:22, 31 July 2011 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Birds