Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Rio de Janeiro, Brazil 003.jpg

File:Rio de Janeiro, Brazil 003.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 28 Jul 2023 at 09:51:46 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Rio de Janeiro, Brazil 003.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Rio de Janeiro, Brazil 003.jpg

-16

16

8043

4485

8043

4919

suggested crop by SHB2000

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Cityscapes#Brazil
•  Info created and uploaded by Wilfredor - nominated by Arion -- 😄 ArionEstar 😜 09:51, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
•  Support -- 😄 ArionEstar 😜 09:51, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
•  Support, though could it be cropped so the wires don't appear as intrusive? --SHB2000 (talk) 11:07, 19 July 2023 (UTC)

  The wires are a reference of where the photo was taken (Sugarloaf cable car). 😄 ArionEstar 😜 11:39, 19 July 2023 (UTC)

•  Support - ABAL1412 (talk) 11:11, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
•  Support I find this much better than the other one below. Yann (talk) 11:14, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
•  Support--Felino Volador (talk) 12:17, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
•  Support--(⧼Anna Massini alias PROPOLI87⧽) (talk) 12:32, 19 July 2023 (UTC)Anna.Massini(⧼Anna Massini alias PROPOLI87⧽) (talk) 12:32, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
•  Oppose This doesn't do justice to an amazing view. Wrong time of day for me. Charlesjsharp (talk) 12:34, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
•  Support Thanks Arion. --Wilfredor (talk) 15:03, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
•  Comment Great view, but the highlights are blown, so Charles may be right. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:34, 20 July 2023 (UTC)

  What's "blown"? 😄 ArionEstar 😜 20:18, 20 July 2023 (UTC)

• Do you mean what does "blown" mean? Maximally bright, so that no details are visible. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:05, 21 July 2023 (UTC)

•  Support JukoFF (talk) 23:10, 20 July 2023 (UTC)
•  Info I added another version --Wilfredor (talk) 00:21, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
•  Oppose The version above is much better Poco a poco (talk) 16:04, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
•  Oppose Per Charlesjsharp. -- Karelj (talk) 09:36, 25 July 2023 (UTC)

Version 2

•  Support for the 2nd version. -- Radomianin (talk) 06:38, 21 July 2023 (UTC)

   Done. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 15:05, 21 July 2023 (UTC)

• Poco a poco, could you please split your vote in the proper manner and only vote once on each of the versions, now that there is a normal 'alt version'. Thanks, --Cart (talk) 21:29, 21 July 2023 (UTC)

•  Support this version Poco a poco (talk) 16:04, 24 July 2023 (UTC)

•  Support This version --LexKurochkin (talk) 18:07, 25 July 2023 (UTC)
•  Support --RodRabelo7 (talk) 00:54, 26 July 2023 (UTC)
•  Support - ABAL1412 (talk) 17:37, 26 July 2023 (UTC)
•  Support Wish it was sharper, but I prefer this version because I don't squint when I look at it. Daniel Case (talk) 02:09, 27 July 2023 (UTC)
•  Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 05:28, 27 July 2023 (UTC)
•  Support --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 13:42, 27 July 2023 (UTC)
•  Support --Wilfredor (talk) 22:42, 27 July 2023 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 9 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Poco a poco (talk) 10:59, 29 July 2023 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Cityscapes#Brazil

The chosen alternative is: File:Rio de Janeiro, Brazil 003 version 2.jpg