Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Valle de La Orotava qtl1.jpg

File:Valle de La Orotava qtl1.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 27 Apr 2011 at 19:12:23 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Valle de La Orotava qtl1.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Valle de La Orotava qtl1.jpg

•  Info Orotava Valley on Tenerife including Puerto de la Cruz and surrounding towns. Please note that the image is very detailed and huge (50 MByte). Lower resolution versions can be accessed from the description page. Created, uploaded and nominated by Quartl (talk) 19:12, 18 April 2011 (UTC)
•  Support --Quartl (talk) 19:12, 18 April 2011 (UTC)
•  Comment ich habe einen kleinen Stitchingfehler gefunden und markiert. Bei den vielen Pixeln bin ich jetzt gerade aber ehrlich gesagt zu faul (und zu müde) um das ganze Bild abzusuchen bzw. zu kontrollieren. --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 21:26, 18 April 2011 (UTC)
  • Thanks for noticing. I will fix the small stitching error later today. --Quartl (talk) 06:43, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
  • Fixed. --Quartl (talk) 15:48, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
•  Support Impressive at full resolution! Small stitching error at the right edge, just above the horizon; very easy to remove. -- MJJR (talk) 20:58, 20 April 2011 (UTC)
  • Thanks, I restitched the image and slightly adjusted brightness and contrast (the flash viewer seems to have the old image cached though). --Quartl (talk) 05:15, 21 April 2011 (UTC)
•  Support The lighting leaves something to be desired, but it's informative and the resolution is great. theMONO 04:42, 22 April 2011 (UTC)
  • Thanks for your support. Could you tell me what could be improved with the lighting? I tried quite hard to get the contrasts as good as they are. --Quartl (talk) 17:29, 22 April 2011 (UTC)
    • The contrasts are good for the image as it it. A sunrise or sunset might have produced a more vibrant image. Nothing wrong with it, besides my personal preference :). theMONO 03:07, 23 April 2011 (UTC)
      • A 36-frame panorama would not have worked under such rapidly changing conditions. -- King of Hearts (talk) 23:45, 24 April 2011 (UTC)
•  Support I'm very impressed by the stitching job (36 pictures, really ?) and the wonderful sharpness and details at high resolution. This picture is very informative because it shows a large serie of samples of human activities (industry, agriculture, tourism, roads...) and landscapes (mountain with snow, fields, coast, sea...). The composition, from the upper left corner to the lower right is eye-catching. Very nice, indeed. --Jebulon (talk) 16:12, 23 April 2011 (UTC)

• French caption with links to fr:wp added--Jebulon (talk) 16:23, 23 April 2011 (UTC)

• Thanks for the praise and for adding the french caption, my knowledge of your language is too limited for this ;-). Yes, it's 36 single pictures and the panorama software had to work quite hard for the result. --Quartl (talk) 18:46, 23 April 2011 (UTC)

•  Support Impressive detail. It does leave me wishing it extended further, especially at upper left and lower left. --Avenue (talk) 10:40, 24 April 2011 (UTC)
•  Support Impressive. Yann (talk) 16:50, 24 April 2011 (UTC)
•  Support The thumbnail doesn't look particularly remarkable, but general good quality + the sheer amount of resolution = FP. -- King of Hearts (talk) 23:45, 24 April 2011 (UTC)
•  Oppose Large, but no WOW. Just ugly houses and some semi-rural landscape. W.S. 11:58, 26 April 2011 (UTC)
•  Oppose same - Benh (talk) 16:45, 26 April 2011 (UTC)
•  Support eigentlich ja Neutral, aber wo die beiden User vor mir das WOW nicht sehen, verstehe ich nicht. Ich bezweifele sehr, dass man dieses landschaftliche schöne Motiv, welches von einem angenehm überblickenden Standort und relativ hoher enzyklopädischer Relevanz aufgenommen wurde, besser ablichten und diese atemberaubende Natur schöner darstellen und kompositionell einen größeren WOW-Effekt zu erzielen kann. Sorry, auf Englisch bekomme ich das nicht formuliert ;-) --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 21:27, 26 April 2011 (UTC)
  • Kein problem. Ich verstehe Deutsch aber sehe deine atemberaubende Natur gar nicht! W.S. 21:34, 26 April 2011 (UTC)
•  Support Superb --Michael Gäbler (talk) 18:28, 27 April 2011 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 9 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 08:04, 28 April 2011 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Panoramas