Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Zicht op de Piz S-chalambert vanuit Val Sinestra 19-09-2023. (d.j.b) 01 02.jpg

File:Zicht op de Piz S-chalambert vanuit Val Sinestra 19-09-2023. (d.j.b) 01 02.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 7 Nov 2023 at 05:31:28 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Zicht op de Piz S-chalambert vanuit Val Sinestra 19-09-2023. (d.j.b) 01 02.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Zicht op de Piz S-chalambert vanuit Val Sinestra 19-09-2023. (d.j.b) 01 02.jpg

• Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Natural/Switzerland#Grisons (Graubünden)
•  Info Night falls around the Piz S-chalambert (View from Val Sinestra at ~6.06 pm). A fairly simple photo, but I like the evening light.
  All by -- Famberhorst (talk) 05:31, 29 October 2023 (UTC)
•  Support -- Famberhorst (talk) 05:31, 29 October 2023 (UTC)
•  Oppose I don't like the very dark hills in the foreground. Charlesjsharp (talk) 19:05, 29 October 2023 (UTC)
•  Comment Very noisy sky with color banding.--Ermell (talk) 21:37, 29 October 2023 (UTC)
•  Oppose The clouds look solid, which is undoubtedly another way to say what Ermell stated above. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:09, 29 October 2023 (UTC)
•  Done. Noise and banding correction. Thank you for your reviews.--Famberhorst (talk) 05:56, 30 October 2023 (UTC)
•  Oppose Per Charlesjsharp. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 14:03, 30 October 2023 (UTC)
•  Support Looking at this version with fresh eyes, I like it and it's an FP to me. The very dark hills frame the mountain, just like you intended. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:54, 31 October 2023 (UTC)
•  Oppose WB off. —kallerna (talk) 06:40, 31 October 2023 (UTC)

• Thanks for your response. Question for you: what does WB off mean?--Famberhorst (talk) 18:23, 31 October 2023 (UTC)

• See Commons:Photography terms#White balance. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:53, 31 October 2023 (UTC)

• Thank you for the link.--Famberhorst (talk) 05:37, 1 November 2023 (UTC)

•  Comment Hi Famberhorst, surely you have more ideal conditions in your Raw file to adjust the white balance afterwards. I took the liberty of doing this in the JPG for comparison. If you prefer this result, please feel free to use the edited file. Best, -- Radomianin (talk) 21:50, 1 November 2023 (UTC)
•  Image edited Dear reviewers @Famberhorst, Charlesjsharp, Ermell, Ikan Kekek, Sebring12Hrs, Kallerna, and ABAL1412: I have adjusted the white balance of the image in agreement with the author. Best regards, -- Radomianin (talk) 07:55, 2 November 2023 (UTC)

•  Comment The grey-green colour banding is still faintly visible. But what bothers me most are the diminishing details on the right side. --Ermell (talk) 09:13, 2 November 2023 (UTC)

• It was almost invisible in the last version, but it's more visible in the new version. I have to cross out my supporting vote. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:50, 2 November 2023 (UTC)

•  Comment I've just been trying to further reduce the mentioned faint color banding. I reached the limits of JPG processing, the results were not satisfactory. Probably the best solution would be to re-process the raw file. Sorry about that. Best regards, -- Radomianin (talk) 22:02, 2 November 2023 (UTC)
•  Re-editing Dear reviewers @Famberhorst, Charlesjsharp, Ermell, Ikan Kekek, Sebring12Hrs, Kallerna, and ABAL1412: , this morning I removed as much of the banding in the sky as I could by using the second last version for a rework. Apologies for pinging again. Best regards, -- Radomianin (talk) 09:58, 3 November 2023 (UTC)

•  Comment It's better again, but they are faintly visible and I'm uncertain this is one of the greatest photos on the site. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:14, 3 November 2023 (UTC)

•  Weak support - ABAL1412^{🇻🇳🇸🇺🇷🇺} (talk ☭) 07:03, 31 October 2023 (UTC)
•  Support I like the composition of the image combined with the favorable lighting of the mountain. In my opinion, the previous removal of the banding as well as the white balance improved the image. -- Radomianin (talk) 07:55, 2 November 2023 (UTC)
•  Oppose The editing is not bad but the whole picture looks a bit unreal. The visible noise reduction and the associated lack of sharpness bothers me the most. Sorry.--Ermell (talk) 18:20, 3 November 2023 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 3 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 14:15, 7 November 2023 (UTC)