Commons:秀逸な画像の推薦
ここにある画像は秀逸な画像への候補画像です。 今日の一枚とは異なりますのでご注意ください。
概要
[edit]推薦にあたって
[edit]推薦者のためのガイドライン
[edit]まずはじめに、『秀逸な画像ガイドライン』、『画像のガイドライン』をお読みください。
ここでは推薦画像の評価を受ける・する際の必要事項を要約して紹介します。
- 解像度 - 200万ピクセル以下の写真画像は、特別な理由が無い限り却下されます。1,600 x 1,200 ピクセル(1.92メガピクセル)は200万ピクセルには届いていない事にご注意ください。
- コモンズに置かれた画像は一般的なPCモニターのみで閲覧されるとは限らず、プリントアウトや高解像度モニターで表示される可能性もあります。将来的にもどのような機器が用いられるようになるかは誰にも予想出来ないので、推薦画像が可能な限り高い解像度を保っている事は重要な事なのです。
- スキャン画像 - 公式な方針ではありませんが、Help:スキャニングページで各種様々な画像を準備するための有用なアドバイスが提供されています。
- フォーカス - 通常、重要な被写体は全て焦点が合っていなければいけません。
- 前景と背景 - 前景や背景に主題ではない物が写り込むと、それは“余計なもの”になり得ます。前景にある物が主題の重要な部分を隠していないか、背景にあるものが構図を損ねていないか(例:後ろの街灯が人物の頭の上から生えているように見える、等)を確認しましょう。
- 全体品質 - 推薦される画像には高い技術品質が要求されます。
- デジタル補正 - 見る人を欺いてはいけません。写真画像のキズ・ホコリ等を修正する、良い編集、故意に人を騙す目的でない限り、デジタル補正は一般的に歓迎されます。例を挙げると、色合い/露出補正、シャープ/ボカシ、遠近感歪み補正、トリミング(切り取り)等がこれにあたります。背景に写り込んだ余計な物を取り除く等のさらに大がかりな修正は、{{Retouched picture}}テンプレートを画像ページへ貼付け、修正した旨を記述しましょう。記述漏れや記述ミスがある等、主題を不正確に見せる編集は決して受け入れられません。
- 価値 - 『全ての画像の中でも特に際立ち、最も価値のある画像』が我々の大きな目標です。秀逸な画像はそれぞれの分野の中でも別格でなけらばならず、故に次の点に留意して下さい。
- たいていの夕日は美しく見えますが、そういう画像のほとんどは他の夕日画像と大差ありません。
- 夜景は美しいですが、普通は日中に撮影された写真の方がより詳細を見せてくれます。
- 必ずしも『美しさに価値がある』わけではありません。
技術的側面では『露出』、『構図』、『動感表現』、『被写界深度』等を見ます。
- 露出とはシャッタースピードと絞りとの組み合わせの事を言い、適切なトーンカーブが見せる陰影〜ハイライトが有用なディティールを描写します。これをラティチュード(露光寛容度)と言い、このラティチュードの陰影〜ハイライトの領域内において、画像を暗め、中庸、明るめに作る事が出来ますが、デジタルカメラ及びデジタル画像はこのラティチュードの範囲がフィルムに比べて狭いです。ディティールの欠損した影部分は必ずしも「悪い」わけではなく、実際にその様な効果が望ましい場合(部分)もあります。ただしディティールの欠損したハイライト部分が大きく面積を占めるのは良くありません。
- 構図とは画像画面内での各要素の配置の事を言います。“三分割法”は構図作成には良い方法で、美術学校でも教えられています。まず、画像に水平線と垂直線をそれぞれ2本引き、画像を水平・垂直方向とも3分割します。主題を中央に配置するとたいていは画面に面白味を欠き、水平線と垂直線が交差する4つの交点の内どれか1つに主題を置いた方が良い画面になるでしょう。地平線は画面を半分に切ってしまうので、通常は地平線を中央に配置するべきではありません。上寄り、若しくは下寄りに配置させる方が良いでしょう。主たる考え方としては空間を上手に使い、躍動感・臨場感のある画面を作るという事です。
- 動感表現 - ここでは被写体の「動き」を表現する手法を紹介します。動きのある被写体は止まって見えるか、もしくはブレて写りますが、これらはどちらの方が良いとは必ずしも言えず、どのような表現意図を持っているかによります。「動感」は主題と共に写り込んでいる他の背景等との関係で表現されます。例えばレーシングカーの撮影。車と背景とが共に止まって見えては、見る側にスピード感は伝わってきません。 なので撮影手法によって車は画面内で止まっているように写り、かつ背景をブレさせることでスピード感が表現され、このような手法を「パンニング(流し撮り)」と呼びます。一方で、背景と共に止まって撮られた高く跳躍したバスケットボール選手は、これは決定的瞬間の「不自然」なポーズになり、これも良い写真になり得るでしょう。
- 被写界深度(DOF)とは主題の前側から後ろ側までのフォーカスエリアの事を言います。被写界深度は全ての画像で明解な意図のもと選択され、深い、または浅い被写界深度は、画像に品質を与えもし、また損なわせもします。浅い被写界深度は、主題を他の被写体から切り離し、見せたい被写体に注目を集めることが出来ます。深い被写界深度は空間を強調させる事が出来ます。広角(短焦点)レンズは深い被写界深度、逆に望遠(長焦点)レンズは浅い被写界深度が得られる傾向があります。また絞りを絞り込むと被写界深度は深く、解放すると浅い被写界深度が得られます。
グラフィック要素では形状、ボリューム、色、テクスチャー、遠近感、バランス、比率 等を見ます。
- 形状とは主題に対する輪郭線、及び形状を言います。
- ボリュームとは主題の立体感に対する品質を言います。立体感は横からのライティングで表現出来、反対に正面からのライティングは被写体を平坦に見せる傾向があり、不向きとされています。自然光の中でベストな光を得るには、早朝か、もしくは夕方の日の光が良いでしょう。
- 色は大変重要で、強すぎる色合いは好ましくありません。
- テクスチャーとは主題の表面材質の描写性に於ける品質を言います。表面材質は横からのライティングにより強調され、手に触れて伝わるかのような質感を与えます。
- 遠近感とは、画像の画面内若しくは外にある消失点で繋がる放射状の直線、これに沿った形で現れる「角度」により表現されます。
- バランスでは画像の画面内での重心が左右均衡か、若しくは片方に寄る等適切な配置が成されているかを見ます。
- 比率では画面の大きさに対する被写体の大きさを見ます。一般的に、小さな被写体は小さく写真に表現してしまう傾向にありますが、相応しい撮影手法により小さな被写体を実寸とは逆に大きく見せる事が可能です。例えば、小さな花を大きな山よりも大きく見る事が出来ます。この手法を指して「倒置法」と呼びます。
- 主題の全ての要素を画像に盛込む必要はありません。多くの写真はそれぞれの個性で評価出来ます。すなわち、画像の色やテクスチャー等々により判断出来ます。
- 『象徴性か妥当性か』 ー 『秀逸な画像』ではしばしばこのようなテーマで意見論争が起こる傾向にあります。技術的・品質的には出来の悪い写真でも極めて撮影困難な被写体を捉えた写真は、凡庸な被写体を写した品質的に良い写真よりも評価されます。もちろん撮影困難な被写体を写し、かつ品質も良い写真は極めて価値の高い写真と言えます。
- 画像は時に撮影者と評価者、若しくはどちらか片方の文化的な偏りが見られます。画像の意図は画像そのものの文化的背景により評価されるべきであり、評価者の文化的背景に依存してはいけません。イメージは人に語りかけ、そして慈しみ、怒り、拒絶、幸せ、悲しみ等の感情を喚起させる力を持っています。良い写真から与えられる心地よさには限りがありません。
画像のガイドラインを事前に読めば、あなたの推薦が成就する可能性を最大限に引き伸ばしてくれるでしょう。
新規推薦
[edit]推薦に値する価値があると考えられる画像を作った、または見つけたならば、その画像に適切な説明とライセンスが与えられているかを確認し、以下に従ってください。
ステップ1:画像名(接頭Image:を含む)を下のテキストボックス内の文字列の後にコピー&ペースト、正しく Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:推薦画像名.jpg と記入されているかを確認し、続いて『作品を推薦』ボタンをクリックします。
ステップ2:ページ編集画面上にある指示に従い必要箇所を付記、ページを保存してください。
ステップ3:ステップ2で作成したページへのリンクをFeatured picture candidates/candidate listへ手動で挿入します。ページ編集をクリックし、候補リスト最上部に以下の書式で推薦画像へのリンクを加えます。
{{Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:推薦画像名.jpg}}
投票
[edit]投票には以下のテンプレートを使用します:
- {{支持}}または{{Support}} ( Support、 Support),
- {{反対}}または{{Oppose}} ( Oppose、 Oppose),
- {{中立}}または{{Neutral}} ( Neutral、 Neutral),
- {{コメント}}または{{Comment}} ( Comment、 Comment),
- 情報:{{Info}} ( Info),
- 質問:{{Question}} ( Question).
テンプレート{{FPX|理由}}を用いて、推薦画像が秀逸な画像の推薦に相応しくない旨を指摘出来ます。テンプレートの「理由」部分に、秀逸な画像には明確に値しない事の説明を書き加えます(可能ならば英語で)。
あなたが何故その画像を好むか、または好まないか、特に( Supportや( Opposeの投票をする際は簡単な理由を加えましょう。また署名(~~~~)も忘れずに。匿名投票は受け付けられません。
秀逸な画像からの除外
[edit]時も経ればやがて『秀逸な画像』の基準も変わります。かつては“充分に価値に値する”と決定されたであろう画像も、その価値は普遍ではありません。ここでは「もはや『秀逸な画像』に値しない」と考えられる画像をリストアップします。リストされた画像へは、{{Keep}} Keep 及び {{維持}} Keep (=『秀逸な画像』に値する)、または{{Delist}} Delist 及び {{除外}} Oppose (=『秀逸な画像』に値しない)を投票します。
あなたが『秀逸な画像』の価値基準に値しないと考える画像があれば、除外候補として提出できます。除外したい画像の画像名(接頭Image:を含む)を下のテキストボックスの文字列の後にコピー&ペーストします。
あなたが作成した新規除外候補のページに以下を加えます。
- 画像の作者、投稿者等の出所情報。
- その画像の“過去の秀逸な画像への推薦”ページへのリンク(画像ページの「リンク節」に表示されています)。
- あなたが除外と考える理由とあなたの署名。
次に、Commons:Featured picture candidates/removalを編集し、下記の書式で作成した除外候補のページのリンクを手動で最上段に挿入します。
{{Commons:Featured picture candidates/removal/Image:除外画像名.jpg}}
秀逸な画像の候補での方針
[edit]総則
[edit]- 投票期間を終えた後、結果は推薦日時から数えて10日後(下記タイムテーブル参照)に決定します。投票期間は推薦日時から数えて9日と23時間59分です。10日、またはそれを超えた投票はカウントされません。
- 匿名寄稿者による推薦を歓迎します。
- 匿名寄稿者による議論への参加を歓迎します。
- 匿名寄稿者による投票はカウントされません。
- 推薦者票は投票へはカウントされません。支持は明示的かつ言明される必要があります。
- 推薦者は自身の推薦をいつでも取り下げる事が出来ます。推薦を取り下げるには "I withdraw my nomination" (推薦を取り下げます)と書くか、テンプレート
{{withdraw|~~~~}}
を加えます。 - ウィキメディア・コモンズのプロジェクトの目的は、全てのウィキメディアプロジェクト(将来的なプロジェクト含む)に於いて自由に利用可能な画像を集積するセントラル・データベースを提供することである、ということを忘れないでください。セントラル・データベースは単純にウィキメディアの保管庫と言うわけではなく、また『秀逸な画像』等のプロジェクトに応じた判断をされるべきではありません。
- 推薦日から数えて5日間支持を受けられなかった画像(推薦者票含まず)は候補リストから外されます。(下記タイムテーブル参照)
- テンプレート{{FPX}}が貼られた画像は、テンプレート{{FPX}}の適用後は推薦者以外の支持票が無い限り、48時間後に候補リストから外されます。
秀逸と除外のルール
[edit]候補画像は下記必要事項に準じて秀逸な画像に認定されます。
- 適切なライセンス情報が添付されている。
- 最低5票以上の支持票を得ている。
- 支持:反対比率が2:1 (賛成が3分の2の過半数)以上である。
- 2つの同様な画像での異なったバージョンは同時に『秀逸な画像』へは認定されず、より支持票の多かった一枚を認定します。
除外ルールでは、投票期間、及びリストから外される期間は秀逸ルールと同じ期間を取ります。除外候補提出後5日間で提出者以外の Delist ( Oppose)票が得られなかった候補は、5日間ルールが適用され、候補リストから外されます。
常連ユーザーが推薦・投票の完了方法に従って、推薦投票を閉じることがあります。終了方法に関してはCommons:Featured picture candidates/What to do after voting is finishedを参照。
何よりも礼儀を忘れずに
[edit]どうか、あなたが評価するその画像が「人の作品」であることを忘れないでください。「これはヒドイ」、「こんなのキライだ」と言ったような表現は避けましょう。もしあなたが『反対』に票を投じなければならないのなら、思いやりを忘れずに。また、あなたの話す英語は、また誰か他の人の話す英語とは同じではないでしょう。慎重に言葉を選んでください。
それでは良い評価を。そして、全てのルールは壊すことが出来るという事を忘れないでください。
関連項目
[edit]- 候補リストの編集はこちら:Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list
- 日付順秀逸な画像リスト:Commons:Featured_pictures/chronological
- 秀逸な画像候補アーカイブ:Commons:Featured picture candidates/Log
- 推薦・投票の完了方法:Commons:Featured picture candidates/What to do after voting is finished
- 基礎英語による写真・画像用語解説
- 秀逸な画像の候補リスト
- Photography critiques(画像評論)
- Help:スキャニング
目次
[edit]秀逸な画像の候補
[edit]Featured picture candidates
[edit]Voting period ends on 15 Jun 2024 at 07:06:24 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious buildings/Ceilings#Germany
- Info Coat of arms and portrait of Cardinal Augustin Bea, ceiling painting, parish church St. Genesius, Riedböhringen, Baden-Württemberg, Germany; created by Llez - uploaded by Llez - nominated by Llez -- Llez (talk) 07:06, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Llez (talk) 07:06, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
File:Close wing mud-puddling position of Prioneris thestylis (Doubleday, 1842) - Spotted Sawtooth 1.jpg
[edit]Voting period ends on 15 Jun 2024 at 04:04:57 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera#Family : Pieridae (Whites and Sulphurs)
- Info created by Atanu Bose Photography - uploaded by Atanu Bose Photography - nominated by Atudu -- Atudu (talk) 04:04, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Atudu (talk) 04:04, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 15 Jun 2024 at 03:56:01 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Portugal
- Info: Caldeira Grande, Furnas, Azores; all by -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 03:56, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 03:56, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 15 Jun 2024 at 03:53:17 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Architectural_elements#Doors
- Info: portal of the Saint Michael Church, Savoca, Sicily; all by -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 03:53, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 03:53, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 14 Jun 2024 at 14:47:52 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods#Family : Tettigoniidae (Katydids or Bush Crickets)
- Info created - uploaded - nominated by Berthold Werner -- Berthold Werner (talk) 14:47, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- Neutral -- Berthold Werner (talk) 14:47, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose 90 % of the picture is blurred because only the head is in focus. And the animal is bad cropped. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 19:00, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose The crop doesn't sit right with me. Wolverine XI 21:53, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 14 Jun 2024 at 11:45:44 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Tanzania
- Info created by Giles Laurent - uploaded by Giles Laurent - nominated by Giles Laurent -- Giles Laurent (talk) 11:45, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 11:45, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Good light and colors but nothing seems to be really in focus. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 18:28, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you for your message. The focus was at infinity. The house on the hill for example seems in clear focus to me. Maybe because of the huge resolution of the file it was still rendering when you zoomed in? -- Giles Laurent (talk) 19:39, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support Very atmospheric. The mountain and also most of the trees on the plain are in focus. I guess the impression of softness is just due to some haze which may be inevitable at these distances. – Aristeas (talk) 06:58, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 14 Jun 2024 at 10:29:53 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals#Family : Macropodidae (Macropods)
- Info No FPs of the subspecies endemic to Tasmania. All by Charlesjsharp -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 10:29, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 10:29, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support I see it hopping...Wolverine XI 21:50, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 04:01, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 14 Jun 2024 at 05:29:37 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors#France
- Info created by ComputerHotline - uploaded by ComputerHotline - nominated by ComputerHotline -- ComputerHotline (talk) 05:29, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- ComputerHotline (talk) 05:29, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Harsh light at right. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 19:24, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Poor technically with very bad lighting. Wolverine XI 21:51, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 14 Jun 2024 at 05:28:12 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors#France
- Info created by ComputerHotline - uploaded by ComputerHotline - nominated by ComputerHotline -- ComputerHotline (talk) 05:28, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- ComputerHotline (talk) 05:28, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Support★ 13:12, 5 June 2024 (UTC)- There're many lens flares on the photo. ★ 15:53, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 13 Jun 2024 at 20:45:13 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Fish#Family : Muraenidae (Moray Eels)
- Info Ribbon eel (Rhinomuraena quaesita), Anilao, Philippines. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 20:45, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 20:45, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 13:12, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 04:01, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 06:57, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 13 Jun 2024 at 18:57:23 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/In their habitats#Carnivora (Carnivores)
- Info Domestic cat. All by-- Shagil Kannur (talk) 18:57, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Shagil Kannur (talk) 18:57, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Need more DoF, the other cat is important too --Wilfredor (talk) 22:03, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Per Wilfredor. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 22:29, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Cute cats, but sorry, the image has a number of issues in addition to the DoF that Wilfredor pointed out. The colors are quite oversaturated and most of the greens have maximum saturation. The left cat is supposed to be in focus but is not very sharp and seems to have been aggressively sharpened in post. Domestic cats are extremely commonly photographed animals so the bar for an outstanding photo is very high in my opinion. dllu (t,c) 03:33, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- Comment It looks a little overprocessed too. ★ 15:38, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- I withdraw my nomination --Shagil Kannur (talk) 04:46, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 13 Jun 2024 at 17:34:09
- Info The image quality is significantly worse than existing FP File:Mount Rushmore detail view.jpg. It is only a tenth of the resolution in each dimension not to mention worse dynamic range and detail. (Original nomination)
- Delist -- dllu (t,c) 17:34, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- Keep This wouldn't be promoted now, after someone has uploaded a 600 megapixel behemoth view of the same subject, but on its own it doesn't fall short enough of FPC standards to need delisting. It's not like this is is VIC, where there can only be one image per subject. — Rhododendrites talk | 20:27, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- Keep as the original nominator. ★ 21:27, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 13 Jun 2024 at 17:27:11 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Sculptures#Statues_outdoors
- Info created by dllu - uploaded by dllu - nominated by Dllu -- dllu (t,c) 17:27, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- dllu (t,c) 17:27, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 13:11, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 06:57, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 13 Jun 2024 at 16:34:18 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family : Laniidae (Shrikes)
- Info created by skander zarrad - uploaded by skander zarrad - nominated by Skander zarrad -- Skander zarrad (talk) 16:34, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Skander zarrad (talk) 16:34, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- Comment This other image from Tunisia is not quite FP but I much prefer it to this nomination. Charlesjsharp (talk) 19:14, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 13 Jun 2024 at 12:16:00 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Photo techniques/Styles and Techniques#Others (It is a combination of light painting and ICM)
- Info created and uploaded by Ibirapuera - nominated by ★ -- ★ 12:16, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- ★ 12:16, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support El Golli Mohamed 13:26, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support Good fow factor. --Podzemnik (talk) 02:15, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:17, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 04:21, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 06:42, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 09:40, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:33, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support Resolution could be better, really good composition. --XRay 💬 14:26, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- WildMouse76 (talk) 21:09, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 06:56, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 13 Jun 2024 at 12:15:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Photo techniques/Styles and Techniques#Abstract
- Info created by Lunna Campos - uploaded by Sturm - nominated by ★ -- ★ 12:15, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- ★ 12:15, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support El Golli Mohamed 13:28, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Symmetrical impression could be better. --XRay 💬 14:26, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- Yes of course, but the arrangement of the elements doesn't appear to be symmetrical, so there's not much to do. ★ 15:41, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 06:55, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 13 Jun 2024 at 11:51:10 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Cityscapes#Germany
- Info all by MB-one -- MB-one (talk) 11:51, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- MB-one (talk) 11:51, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Very low resolution by modern standards especially for an architectural subject; and the composition could be better in my opinion. For example, the way a lamp post in the foreground is occluding one of the main pylons of the bridge. dllu (t,c) 17:18, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 13 Jun 2024 at 10:06:38 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera#Family : Pieridae (Whites and Sulphurs)
- Info created by El Golli Mohamed - uploaded by El Golli Mohamed - nominated by El Golli Mohamed -- El Golli Mohamed (talk) 10:06, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- El Golli Mohamed (talk) 10:06, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Berthold Werner (talk) 11:52, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 14:50, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:18, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 11:48, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:32, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support All relevant areas are naturally in focus without artificial oversharpening. Attractive subject. -- Radomianin (talk) 05:38, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 06:54, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 13 Jun 2024 at 08:40:47 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals#Family : Cercopithecidae (Old World Monkeys)
- Info Barbary macaque father and mother with baby; created by Llez| - uploaded by Llez - nominated by Llez -- Llez (talk) 08:40, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Llez (talk) 08:40, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose technically a good shot, but not outstanding to me. Especially the shadow in the background doesn't help. --MB-one (talk) 11:55, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose No focus on the eyes, and the shadows are quite annoying. Wolverine XI 14:49, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Shadow in the background, I'd also prefer lower point of view. --Podzemnik (talk) 02:14, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- Weak supportThe shadows are a downside, but the baby steals the show.--Famberhorst (talk) 04:24, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 13 Jun 2024 at 05:31:48 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Australia#Victoria
- Info created and uploaded by Faj2323 - nominated by WildMouse76 -- WildMouse76 (talk) 05:31, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- WildMouse76 (talk) 05:31, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- -donald- (talk) 06:55, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 07:46, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support El Golli Mohamed 10:14, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Berthold Werner (talk) 11:53, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MB-one (talk) 11:54, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 12:02, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 12:15, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 14:50, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:24, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 11:48, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:31, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --XRay 💬 14:27, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 05:28, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 06:54, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 13 Jun 2024 at 01:41:47
- Info all by Łukasz [Wolf] Golowanow (talk). Commons:Featured_pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Air_transport#Military_jet_aircraft. Not very sharp. Compare to this image by the same author, which is better in every way: File:F-16_Demo_Team_2722.jpg (Original nomination)
- Delist -- Schierbecker (talk) 01:41, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- Keep (was: {{FPX}}) Sorry, but only two active nominations by the same user are allowed. – Aristeas (talk) 07:00, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- Comment @Aristeas: this is not exactly a nomination. 2804:14D:5C32:4673:DA2:DE21:DDC8:DCF1 04:11, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
- Comment We often say that images are “nominated for delisting” and AFAICR apply the “only two nominations” limit also to delist nominations. However I would be happy to learn that I am wrong.
- Asking some users which were especially interested in rule discussions in the past – @A.Savin, Basile Morin, Charlesjsharp, Rhododendrites, W.carter – and everybody else with FPC experience: Would you say that the “only two active nominations by the same user” limit applies also to delist nominations (as I have assumed here) or would you say that one can nominate as many images for delisting as one wants?
- I would argue that the limit should also apply to delist nominations.
- Formal argument: the rules say “The delisting rules are the same as those for FPs, with voting taking place over the same time period”, so if not stated differently the two nominations limit should also apply to delist nominations.
- Material argument: In past discussions the limit has often been justified by emphasizing (1) that nominations must be discussed carefully (we want quality, not quantity); and (2) that the FP maintenance resources are very limited. IMHO both points apply even a fortiori to delist nominations: (1) they certainly need an especially careful discussion (we all want to avoid arbitrary delisting) and (2) they mean even more work for us maintainers than normal nominations – delisting a FP always requires misc. manual edits.
- How do you see this? Thank you very much for your statements! Best, – Aristeas (talk) 05:35, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 13 Jun 2024 at 00:31:10 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Historical/People#1850-1859
- Info created by Nadar - restored, uploaded, and nominated by Adam Cuerden -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 00:31, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 00:31, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- Question I get that the noise is authentic to the source photograph, but wouldn't it be even better to remove it digitally? --MB-one (talk) 11:59, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- That kind of cleanup tends to give a very unnatural look. (I did spend a great deal of time removing the dust, though) Adam Cuerden (talk) 12:04, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- I agree with Adam. He knows what he is doing. Charlesjsharp (talk) 19:18, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- That kind of cleanup tends to give a very unnatural look. (I did spend a great deal of time removing the dust, though) Adam Cuerden (talk) 12:04, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 19:50, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Aristeas (talk) 07:52, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 06:53, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
File:Su-27UBM Radom 2009 c.JPG (delist)
[edit]Voting period ends on 12 Jun 2024 at 17:55:40
- Info all by Łukasz [Wolf] Golowanow (talk). Grainy. (Original nomination)
- Delist -- Schierbecker (talk) 17:55, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
Thank you for nominating this image. Unfortunately, it does not fall within the Guidelines and is unlikely to succeed for the following reason: Sorry, but only two active nominations by the same user are allowed. | Anyone other than the nominator who disagrees may override this template by changing {{FPX}} to {{FPX contested}} and adding a vote in support. Voting will then continue in the usual way. If not contested within 24 hours, this nomination may be closed. |
– Aristeas (talk) 07:01, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 12 Jun 2024 at 17:02:05 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family_:_Paradisaeidae_(Birds-of-paradise)
- Info created & uploaded by JJ Harrison – nominated by Ivar (talk) 17:02, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Ivar (talk) 17:02, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
- Comment The right side is very blurry. ★ 20:14, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Not one of the rarest birds, though amazing to get a photograph; but so tricky to ignore serious technical shortcomings. I much prefer several of the other images on Commons. Charlesjsharp (talk) 20:48, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Quality is insufficient even for QI. -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 01:59, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose There are many things wrong with this. We got quality, the distracting stuff on the right, technical problems. -- WildMouse76 (talk) 02:02, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
File:Red Arrows Radom 2009 t.JPG (delist)
[edit]Voting period ends on 12 Jun 2024 at 16:40:29
- Info all by Łukasz [Wolf] Golowanow (talk). There is a distressing amount of chromatic aberration in this photo. Commons:Featured_pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Air_transport#Military_jet_aircraft. (Original nomination)
- Delist -- Schierbecker (talk) 16:40, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
- Delist : very blurry --The Cosmonaut (talk) 14:53, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- Delist per nom. --SHB2000 (talk) 06:42, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- Delist Indeed poor quality even for its time. – Aristeas (talk) 07:51, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- Delist per Schierbecker and Aristeas. -- Radomianin (talk) 05:44, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 12 Jun 2024 at 12:04:26 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals#Family : Cercopithecidae (Old World Monkeys)
- Info created by Giles Laurent - uploaded by Giles Laurent - nominated by Giles Laurent -- Giles Laurent (talk) 12:04, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 12:04, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
- Comment For FP this should be identified and categorized as a juvenile Papio anubis Charlesjsharp (talk) 14:57, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
- Done Thanks for the comment, caption, description, category and file name edited -- Giles Laurent (talk) 15:20, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 15:39, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 17:50, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support
JJGiles, you've done it again! --SHB2000 (talk) 21:31, 3 June 2024 (UTC) - Support ★ 12:03, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- WildMouse76 (talk) 13:16, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support No words. Wolverine XI 14:51, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Skander zarrad (talk) 21:18, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:25, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Aristeas (talk) 07:51, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 09:52, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:30, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 05:30, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 06:53, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 12 Jun 2024 at 05:33:46 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera#Family : Nymphalidae (Brush-footed Butterflies)
- Info created by Atanu Bose Photography - uploaded by Atanu Bose Photography - nominated by Atudu -- Atudu (talk) 05:33, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Atudu (talk) 05:33, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support Incredible specimen. Wolverine XI 09:54, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support Great! --Plozessor (talk) 15:53, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 17:50, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Mounir TOUZRI (talk) 23:15, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 07:52, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support Amazing contrast between the butterfly and the background. --MB-one (talk) 12:04, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Rhododendrites talk | 20:28, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Skander zarrad (talk) 21:17, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Aristeas (talk) 07:50, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support Ermell (talk) 09:54, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 11:47, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:29, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support as per MB-one. -- Radomianin (talk) 16:10, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 12 Jun 2024 at 04:43:49 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Charadriiformes#Genus : Vanellus
- Info created and uploaded by Charlesjsharp - nominated by WildMouse76 -- WildMouse76 (talk) 04:43, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- WildMouse76 (talk) 04:43, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Thank you for the nomination. Charlesjsharp (talk) 15:06, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
- @Charlesjsharp Judging by how you replied to this nomination, I'm assuming there's something wrong with the image. Is part of the animal out of focus? I would love to know. -- WildMouse76 (talk) 16:17, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
- Of course it looks lovely at first glance, but I am not sure it has the sharpness and feather definition for FP. Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:39, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
I withdraw my nomination -- WildMouse76 (talk) 01:00, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 12 Jun 2024 at 04:13:25 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects#Other objects in landscapes
- Info Ecocathedral in Mildam municipality of Heerenveen, Part of surplus building material stacked in a special way. (This is a special project that will continue until the year 3000).
All by -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 04:13, 3 June 2024 (UTC) - Support -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 04:13, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 07:51, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose interesting subject and technically a good shot. But the composition and contrast is not FP worthy to me. --MB-one (talk) 12:08, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Pretty boring to say the least. Wolverine XI 14:53, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 11 Jun 2024 at 21:00:03 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Historical/People#1940-1949
- Info created by 京都東 - uploaded by 京都東 - nominated by AESTIVUM -- SekisounoAestivum (talk) 21:00, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- SekisounoAestivum (talk) 21:00, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose File size is too small and very grainy, even for an image in that year -- WildMouse76 (talk) 21:23, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Poor quality and very noisy IMO. Wolverine XI 09:58, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 11 Jun 2024 at 19:32:53 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People#People at work
- Info Lonely Arabian shepherd selling sheep in Ramadan month (street of Marrakesh, far from souk). My shot. --Mile (talk) 19:32, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Mile (talk) 19:32, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Nothing out of the ordinary. Just a man with his sheep. Or am I missing something? Wolverine XI 10:04, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Per Wolverine, also some parts (like the sheep's neck) are blurry without an apparent reason. --Plozessor (talk) 15:55, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose per Wolverine 11. --SHB2000 (talk) 21:31, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support great composition. --MB-one (talk) 12:07, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support: the light is not ideal, but very expressive somehow. --The Cosmonaut (talk) 14:49, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 11 Jun 2024 at 18:47:44 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds#Family_:_Phasianidae_(Grouse,_Partridges,_Peafowl,_Pheasants,_Quail,_Turkeys)
- Info all by Tuxyso -- Tuxyso (talk) 18:47, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Tuxyso (talk) 18:47, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Sorry, insufficient compositional quality for a common animal. Part of the organism is obscured and the background is busy. dllu (t,c) 22:09, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Distracting back- and foreground, and subject in shadow, sorry. BigDom (talk) 02:08, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Beautiful peafowl but a less than stellar composition. Wolverine XI 10:06, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support El Golli Mohamed 15:54, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose per others -- WildMouse76 (talk) 18:30, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 11 Jun 2024 at 18:38:40 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals/Carnivora#Family : Herpestidae (Mongooses)
- Comment Banded mongoose (mungos mungo)
- Info all by Tuxyso -- Tuxyso (talk) 18:38, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Tuxyso (talk) 18:38, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 20:36, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
- Weak support Correct focus with acceptable DoF, nice composition and the subject is well lit, but I find the bright spot top left a little distracting. BigDom (talk) 02:14, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
- Weak oppose I'd prefer the background to be all black. Wolverine XI 10:08, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 15:40, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support El Golli Mohamed 15:52, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- WildMouse76 (talk) 18:31, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 20:49, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 07:49, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Aristeas (talk) 07:49, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:28, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 11 Jun 2024 at 15:32:11 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Towers
- Info created by Jmh2o - uploaded by Jmh2o - nominated by Jmh2o -- JmH2O(talk) 15:32, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
- Abstain As author. -- JmH2O(talk) 15:32, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Pleasant composition with nice light but IMO not outstanding shot. Maybe a lower point of view with more road and less sky would work better. --Podzemnik (talk) 02:18, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
File:Vellereille-les-Brayeux - Abbaye de Bonne-Espérance - vue depuis la cour d'honneur - 2023-09-23 - 01.jpg
[edit]Voting period ends on 11 Jun 2024 at 14:27:21 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious_buildings#Belgium
- Info created by Jmh2o - uploaded by Jmh2o - nominated by Jmh2o -- JmH2O(talk) 14:27, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
- Abstain As author. --JmH2O(talk) 15:17, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
- Neutral very slightly leaning out and sharpness could be better. --MB-one (talk) 12:13, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Nice quality but the light is quite ordinary. Dark trees with the right wing in the shade makes the photo looks unbalanced - too bright on the left, too dark on the right. --Podzemnik (talk) 02:20, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 11 Jun 2024 at 13:29:19 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Other#United States
- Info Bluebells (Hyacinthoides non-scripta) - pretty park scene at the botanical garden. I looked up the origin of that odd "non-scripta" name. It's a mythology reference. When Hyacinthus was accidentally killed, a flower grew from his blood and Apollo's tears marked the letters AIAI on the petals. Basically this is saying "not the kind of hyacinth that has letters on it". all by — Rhododendrites talk | 13:29, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Rhododendrites talk | 13:29, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support —Bruce1eetalk 14:03, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 15:59, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- WildMouse76 (talk) 17:30, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
- Comment any reason to cut the road, could start from edge.--Mile (talk) 19:42, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
- You mean crop out the mulch path on the right? No, I would not want to do that. I like the composition. — Rhododendrites talk | 13:27, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support El Golli Mohamed 11:32, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 12:21, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 17:52, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 07:48, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 12:04, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support Beautiful. – Aristeas (talk) 07:48, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:26, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 11 Jun 2024 at 13:07:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Objects#Clothing and textiles
- Info Jun Takahashi dress for Undercover, spring/summer 2024. Featured in the Metropolitan Museum of Art exhibition "Sleeping Beauties: Reawakening Fashion". A different version of this dress got some attention when it was worn to this year's Met Gala. all by — Rhododendrites talk | 13:07, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Rhododendrites talk | 13:07, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support Who should wear something like that?--Ermell (talk) 13:37, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 15:50, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support No idea how and who should wear it, but it works as a beautiful, aesthetic art object. Well captured! -- Radomianin (talk) 16:02, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 12:21, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 15:42, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 17:53, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 18:44, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 07:43, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MB-one (talk) 12:13, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cool image. Wolverine XI 14:54, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Radomianin. – Aristeas (talk) 07:47, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:25, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --XRay 💬 14:27, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 11 Jun 2024 at 09:10:45 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family_:_Corvidae_(Crows,_Jays_and_Magpies)
- Info A raven, Corvus corax, standing in a puddle at Bonny Doon Beach in Davenport, California. Renominated since the previous nomination got no feedback. created by Grendelkhan - uploaded by Grendelkhan - nominated by Grendelkhan -- grendel|khan 09:10, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- grendel|khan 09:10, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Sorry you didn't get feedback on the last one. Once in a while we'll see a photo that isn't quite up to anyone's standards for Featured Picture, but also isn't particularly bad enough to oppose. An all-black subject is very difficult to photograph, and while you've done a pretty good job here, the level of detail just isn't up to what people expect for birds at FPC. From looking at the ground, it looks like the focus might be just slightly past the bird. A smaller focus window and faster shutter might help. Some people might find the background a little off-putting, too (there's a lot of personal preference involved here). So in short I think you have a good photo that could be helpful to illustrate a common raven, but it's probably not going to work for Featured Picture. — Rhododendrites talk | 13:45, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose I don't see an outstanding photo - quality, composition, and light are all good but not FP good to me. The left tight crop makes the photo look unbalanced. --Podzemnik (talk) 02:23, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 10 Jun 2024 at 15:55:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media/People#Paintings
- Info created by John Taylor / National Portrait Gallery, uploaded and nominated by Yann
- Support Not very high resolution, but good reproduction of a famous painting. FP on English WP. -- Yann (talk) 15:55, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Sorry, but the quality is very low. I suggest restoring then nominating it again. Wolverine XI 19:57, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
- This is a historical painting, so we usually do not edit it. This one is more than 400 years old, so the cracks are a normal feature in this case. Yann (talk) 19:27, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 10 Jun 2024 at 15:49:19 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People/Portrait#Women
- Info created by Hernan Irastorza, uploaded by Jeff G., nominated by Yann
- Info Ruben Andon: Make up, Body art & hair: Barbara Rizzuti
- Support Artsy portrait. -- Yann (talk) 15:49, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Rainbow? No. Charlesjsharp (talk) 14:49, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Rhododendrites talk | 17:25, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support Striking! -- Radomianin (talk) 19:11, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
- Strong support Perfectly in time for June :-). --SHB2000 (talk) 00:09, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Not a good file name per Commons guidelines. Please think of such things before you create nominations. Something like "Woman with rainbow-hued body makeup" would be better. Plus the description is inadequate, I'll fix that one for you. --Cart (talk) 09:46, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
- @W.carter: OK for renaming it after closure. I don't think it is that urgently necessary to do it now. Yann (talk) 18:17, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
- No urgency per se, but people may be more inclined to support the nom if everything is top notch for it, plus nominators tend to forget such "minor" things once they've got their star. --Cart (talk) 18:23, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
- @W.carter: OK for renaming it after closure. I don't think it is that urgently necessary to do it now. Yann (talk) 18:17, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose This image is technically fine, but I don't like the left-leaning nature of the subject. A centered subject is preferable, and a more expressive face is desirable. Overall, not FP in my eyes. Wolverine XI 10:18, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks for your review, Wolverine XI. As far as I know, this kind of image composition is often used in documentaries to create suspense and attention. The usual harmonious placement on the right would be the less conspicuous standard. -- Radomianin (talk) 12:35, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
Support-- Giles Laurent (talk) 12:20, 3 June 2024 (UTC)- Comment: there are a bunch of artifacts along the upper edge of the table that need to be fixed. --The Cosmonaut (talk) 15:38, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
- True there's a weird rectangle and an unexplainable blurred orange zone close to it. I will support again once it's fixed. -- Giles Laurent (talk) 15:41, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
- Improvement done (3rd editing) (SwissTransfer link) @Jeff G., Yann, The Cosmonaut, and Giles Laurent: I have removed the above mentioned artifacts and probably unnatural appearing editing marks. If you are satisfied with the improvement after checking, you are welcome to use this version for an update. Best regards, -- Radomianin (talk) 17:02, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
- Much better thank you! There seems to still be a blurry area close to her right shoulder (so the shoulder that appears on left on the image). There is also a blurry area close to the thumb and close to the other hand. Also, I'm wondering, is it over a table that she's placing her arms or is just a soft surface? Because it is a bit strange how the sort of white table is extremely linear just bellow the body but on the left it becomes a bit wavy (so I think it's a soft surface but that there was a white rectangle applied in postproduction bellow the body) -- Giles Laurent (talk) 17:16, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
- Done Thanks for the quick feedback, Giles. The messy spot on her right shoulder has been fixed and the link above has been updated with the 2nd edit. As for the table, I think it's either a soft blanket or a mattress that the model is resting her elbows on. The area in the middle at chest height was probably straightened afterwards by the creator. Best, -- Radomianin (talk) 18:25, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
- @Jeff G., Radomianin, The Cosmonaut, and Giles Laurent: I uploaded the version edited by Radomianin. Yann (talk) 18:17, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Thanks for the update, Yann. Sorry I wasn't that fast :) Updated the link above: I removed the messy spot on the right shoulder that Giles mentioned. I'll leave it up to you if you want to do another update. If so, thanks in advance :) -- Radomianin (talk) 18:25, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
- Done Yann (talk) 19:11, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
- Dear Yann, unfortunately in my haste I forgot to edit two spots mentioned by Giles, namely those on the right thumb and the left hand. I apologize that you have to take action again, but you can wait until tomorrow after Giles has checked again. I think all the spots are fixed now. The link above has been updated. It's the best we can do to rescue the nomination :) Sincerely, -- Radomianin (talk) 20:18, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you and very good job Radomianin! I support the third edited version with the hands blur fixed that I guess will be uploaded soon to update the actual version Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 20:25, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
- Done Yann (talk) 20:24, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- Dear Yann, unfortunately in my haste I forgot to edit two spots mentioned by Giles, namely those on the right thumb and the left hand. I apologize that you have to take action again, but you can wait until tomorrow after Giles has checked again. I think all the spots are fixed now. The link above has been updated. It's the best we can do to rescue the nomination :) Sincerely, -- Radomianin (talk) 20:18, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support: much better. --The Cosmonaut (talk) 19:27, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 21:29, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support Many thanks for your improvements, Radomianin! – Aristeas (talk) 07:46, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --XRay 💬 14:28, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 10 Jun 2024 at 14:14:25 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Transport#Train stations
- Info created by Plozessor - uploaded by Plozessor - nominated by Plozessor -- Plozessor (talk) 14:14, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Not exceptional in any way. Wolverine XI 19:59, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
NeutralNice but tilted at the top. ★ 00:42, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
- @ArionStar: Sure? The roof is crooked. The picture is straight as can be seen from the handrail. Or are you referring to something else? --Plozessor (talk) 03:46, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
- The roof. ★ 14:15, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
- The ceiling (ceiling/teto is what you see inside a building, and a roof/telhado is what you see from the outside) is not horizontal, it is leaning and it is higher on the right side than the left side. There is nothing the photographer can do about it; unless he brings in a building team and have them reconstructing the station. --Cart (talk) 15:43, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
- Ok. Support ★ 15:52, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
- Thx Cart for the clarification! Yes, the ceiling is crooked, though I think that this is because the roof is crooked ;) --Plozessor (talk) 18:25, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support after clarification. --SHB2000 (talk) 00:10, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
- The ceiling (ceiling/teto is what you see inside a building, and a roof/telhado is what you see from the outside) is not horizontal, it is leaning and it is higher on the right side than the left side. There is nothing the photographer can do about it; unless he brings in a building team and have them reconstructing the station. --Cart (talk) 15:43, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
- @ArionStar: Sure? The roof is crooked. The picture is straight as can be seen from the handrail. Or are you referring to something else? --Plozessor (talk) 03:46, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support Clean work on a difficult object. Thanks to Cart for the analysis :) -- Radomianin (talk) 17:11, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support: I can see where Remedy Entertainment got inspiration for the Oldest House... --The Cosmonaut (talk) 15:45, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 07:41, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support Interesting contemporain architecture with concrete and space, and not easy to capture without any people. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 07:44, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Sebring12Hrs --MB-one (talk) 12:15, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- Comment If the disruptive moiré on the escalators and the cut-off entrance are removed, I am also in favour.--Ermell (talk) 10:06, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 10 Jun 2024 at 09:37:48 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media/Maps#Maps of Europe
- Info created and uploaded by Kevinpaulscarrott - nominated by SHB2000 --SHB2000 (talk) 09:37, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support This has got to be one of the best city directory maps created by a Commons user out there. --SHB2000 (talk) 09:37, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
- Question There seem to be quite a few problems with the detail; naturally maps are all about accurate detail. It needs consistency of use of Norwegian/English (e.g. Gata/Gate; use of Ceramist (a person) as opposed to Ceramics/Pottery). Accommodation should be Hotel. Huset Vart seems to be a shopping centre in a converted bicycle factory, not a science factory. Do Norwegians translate Vinmonopolet as Liquor Store; the American term? I've heard them using alcohol store or using vinmonopolet when speaking English. Charlesjsharp (talk) 10:41, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
- Just a note from a Scandi. These days the languages (Norwegian/Swedish/Danish) spoken and written by Scandinavians contain a lot of English words and expressions, and most of us don't know the difference between pure American and British English. We learn and use a hodgepodge from what we pick up in media, films and tv shows, and try to adapt what we say so that people will understand the meaning rather than true translations. It's sort of the Scandi version of Pidgin English. Hence we use the real names of companies like 'Vinmonopolet' (in Sweden, Systembolaget has the same function) when speaking among foreign friends, but terms like 'Liquor Store' when describing it to the public in general. --Cart (talk) 11:18, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
- Whatever it should be called, the Vinmonopolet is nowhere near the shown location from 2022, so you'd never find it using this map. Charlesjsharp (talk) 14:13, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
- Most maps of larger areas are outdated as soon as they are published. --Cart (talk) 14:25, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
- Whatever it should be called, the Vinmonopolet is nowhere near the shown location from 2022, so you'd never find it using this map. Charlesjsharp (talk) 14:13, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
- Just a note from a Scandi. These days the languages (Norwegian/Swedish/Danish) spoken and written by Scandinavians contain a lot of English words and expressions, and most of us don't know the difference between pure American and British English. We learn and use a hodgepodge from what we pick up in media, films and tv shows, and try to adapt what we say so that people will understand the meaning rather than true translations. It's sort of the Scandi version of Pidgin English. Hence we use the real names of companies like 'Vinmonopolet' (in Sweden, Systembolaget has the same function) when speaking among foreign friends, but terms like 'Liquor Store' when describing it to the public in general. --Cart (talk) 11:18, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support El Golli Mohamed 13:24, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Leaning keep, but a few comments/questions: 1) why not go with the svg version? 2) It looks like File:City map stavanger.svg is the user's masterwork (in its 24th edition!). 3) Since it looks like the creator regularly updates these, does promoting it to FP prevent that updating? Would it have to be a separate file? I would support a rare exception to the prohibition on changing FPs once they're promoted in a case like this, since updates are likely just going to make it more accurate (and remove mistakes/out of date locations). — Rhododendrites talk | 17:23, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 10 Jun 2024 at 06:41:46 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Food and drink#Sweet food
- Info created and uploaded by Shitadevi - nominated by Desertasad -- Desertasad (talk) 06:41, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Desertasad (talk) 06:41, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
- Question Could you please add a description in English (even with Google Translate, native speakers will fix it if needed). Yann (talk) 14:51, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
- I've made an attempt at machine translation but it's up to native speakers to fix it. dllu (t,c) 22:10, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support outstanding. --MB-one (talk) 12:17, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 05:15, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
File:Kue Lumpur Pandan Jajanan Pasar Tradisional (crop).jpg, not featured
[edit]Voting period ends on 10 Jun 2024 at 04:38:03 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Food and drink#Sweet food
- Info created by Alvian Choirur Rozaq - uploaded by Desertasad - nominated by Desertasad -- Desertasad (talk) 04:38, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Desertasad (talk) 04:38, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
- Question Could you please add a description in English (even with Google Translate, native speakers will fix it if needed). Yann (talk) 14:50, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose noticeable noise, even without zoom. -- WildMouse76 (talk) 15:35, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Poor quality and noise. Wolverine XI 20:02, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
File:MiG-29 38.JPG (delist)
[edit]Voting period ends on 10 Jun 2024 at 04:35:18
- Info all by Łukasz [Wolf] Golowanow (talk). Commons:Featured_pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Air_transport#Military_jet_aircraft It's a grainy image of the undercarriage of a fighter jet. We've all seen one before. (Original nomination)
- Delist -- Schierbecker (talk) 04:35, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
- Delist per nom. --SHB2000 (talk) 09:38, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
- Delist per nominator. Красный wanna talk? 19:30, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
- Delist per nom -- WildMouse76 (talk) 21:45, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
- Weak keep: I feel this can be improved with careful post-processing. --The Cosmonaut (talk) 14:55, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 10 Jun 2024 at 04:36:29 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Towers#France
- Info all by Tournasol7 -- Tournasol7 (talk) 04:36, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
- Abstain As author. Tournasol7 (talk) 04:36, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support Light and composition. The building seems to dominate over the infinite scenery. Nice flowers in the foreground -- Basile Morin (talk) 06:19, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support —Bruce1eetalk 07:35, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 11:35, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:03, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support I love how you captured the tower and the valley it overlooks. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 14:13, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 03:47, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Terragio67 (talk) 03:49, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support for image composition, lighting, and color mood. -- Radomianin (talk) 08:05, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --BigDom (talk) 10:11, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Llez (talk) 11:25, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 17:14, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support Beautiful -- Giles Laurent (talk) 12:19, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Berthold Werner (talk) 15:20, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Milseburg (talk) 19:51, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support Lovely flowers. Wolverine XI 14:56, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Frank and Radomianin. – Aristeas (talk) 07:43, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support Ermell (talk) 10:10, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 10 Jun 2024 at 04:18:04 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious_buildings#China
- Info created by dllu - uploaded by dllu - nominated by Dllu -- dllu (t,c) 04:18, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- dllu (t,c) 04:18, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
- Why does the water appear very grainy? --SHB2000 (talk) 04:20, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
- I can only see slight grain when pixel peeping the 100 megapixel image, which I don't find distracting at all. Are you perhaps referring to the ripples reflecting the sky? dllu (t,c) 05:06, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
- Maybe – I'll wait and see what others have to say. --SHB2000 (talk) 09:39, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
- Those mini-ripples on the water look fine to me. It's what you get when you have a breeze blowing on a lake with no rolling waves. --Cart (talk) 13:18, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
- Fair enough – Support. --SHB2000 (talk) 08:54, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
- Those mini-ripples on the water look fine to me. It's what you get when you have a breeze blowing on a lake with no rolling waves. --Cart (talk) 13:18, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
- Maybe – I'll wait and see what others have to say. --SHB2000 (talk) 09:39, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
Support Desertasad (talk) 05:11, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
- Sorry, but per the header, only "[e]ditors whose accounts have at least 10 days and 50 edits can vote." Your account only has 24 edits as of 09:40, 1 June 2024 (UTC). --SHB2000 (talk) 09:40, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support Wow, that is super high resolution. Toadspike (talk) 06:31, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 22:39, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support LGTM -- WildMouse76 (talk) 04:18, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Llez (talk) 11:25, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
- Weak oppose Resokution is great and the motif interesting, but the lighting and composition/POV are not at FP level for me. Poco a poco (talk) 12:29, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
Oppose Pretty uninteresting light and strangely washed out colours on the building. The sharpness could also be better.--Ermell (talk) 13:46, 2 June 2024 (UTC)- I agree about the light. Regrettably, the sky was hazy. The colors are slightly washed out since it's very far away, but I've already applied aggressive dehazing compared to the original [1]. I'm surprised to see sharpness being mentioned since the sharpness seems fine to me on the 100 megapixel photo except perhaps for the extreme corners of the image. dllu (t,c) 20:20, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
- Comment To be fair, I was wrong about the sharpness.--Ermell (talk) 10:15, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose per Poco an Ermell. --Milseburg (talk) 19:38, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 9 Jun 2024 at 19:59:13 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds#Family : Podicipedidae (Grebes)
- Info created by El Golli Mohamed - uploaded by El Golli Mohamed - nominated by El Golli Mohamed -- El Golli Mohamed (talk) 19:59, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- El Golli Mohamed (talk) 19:59, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Weak support I think the center side of the organism is a bit out of focus. -- WildMouse76 (talk) 21:31, 31 May 2024 (UTC)- Support -- WildMouse76 (talk) 09:35, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 23:52, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 03:48, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Llez (talk) 11:24, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 13:28, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 12:19, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:20, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 19:39, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 9 Jun 2024 at 18:32:22 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Germany#Bavaria
- Info created by Plozessor - uploaded by Plozessor - nominated by Plozessor -- Plozessor (talk) 18:32, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Amazing! ★ 23:51, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Weak opposefor the purple glare near the sun, sorry -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:57, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
- @Basile Morin: Tried to fix that purple glare, please take another look. --Plozessor (talk) 04:46, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
- Still something, but almost gone - Basile Morin (talk) 06:13, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
- @Basile Morin: Updated it once more. --Plozessor (talk) 14:34, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support Good now El Golli Mohamed 07:10, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Sorry, yes nice autumn but otherwise nothing special for me. --A.Savin 08:50, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support Contre-jour very well handled. --MB-one (talk) 12:20, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support Beautiful autumn scenery. It could be worth trying to brighten up it further – underexposing was necessary here, but is to be compensated in post-processing. Of course it’s a matter of taste how bright it should get … – Aristeas (talk) 07:40, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 16:43, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 9 Jun 2024 at 17:39:17 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Chile
- Info created by Pedro Szekely - uploaded by JustEMV - nominated by JustEMV -- JustEMV (talk) 17:39, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- JustEMV (talk) 17:39, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 19:42, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Oppose The cloud obscuring parts of the mountain isn't visually appealing IMO. Also, the quality of the mountains isn't worthy of a FP, especially when the resolution and size are near 20 MB -- WildMouse76 (talk)20:59, 31 May 2024 (UTC)- Neutral Now that I think about it, the fog isn't really a problem. I'm still disturbed by the quality of the mountains. -- WildMouse76 (talk) 15:03, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support I think that is precisely the theme, excellent cover for the book "the fog" --Wilfredor (talk) 17:02, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you for your feedback! Personally, I believe the clouds add drama and enhance the scene :) JustEMV (talk) 01:18, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- Neutral a bit much noise. Otherwise FP worthy. --MB-one (talk) 12:21, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 19:46, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support I like the scene. It's true that the quality of the mountains could be better, but there are many details in the foreground. --Harlock81 (talk) 10:40, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 9 Jun 2024 at 15:21:47 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Castles and fortifications#Croatia
- Info all by Tournasol7 -- Tournasol7 (talk) 15:21, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
- Abstain As author. Tournasol7 (talk) 15:21, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 19:41, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
- Weak oppose Main subject in the shadow. And low wow factor in my view because the architecture is not incredible -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:46, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support El Golli Mohamed 07:10, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 03:46, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 05:13, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Llez (talk) 11:22, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support somehow --Mile (talk) 19:38, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 12:18, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 20:52, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support Works for me. – Aristeas (talk) 07:35, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:23, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
File:La Défense, Paris April 2012.jpg (delist)
[edit]Voting period ends on 9 Jun 2024 at 00:50:50
→
- Info Blown-out/overexposed sky on the horizon; replacing to File:La Défense at night, 24 June 2014.jpg (Original nomination)
- Delist and replace -- ★ 00:50, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
- Delist and replace -- -donald- (talk) 06:04, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Wrong file? this image was promoted, the other is supposed to replace, right? At first sight, the crop at the left was better in the original -- Basile Morin (talk) 09:04, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
- But the photo-processing of the latter is better. ★ 16:16, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
- The rythme generated by the curved light rail is also visually much more interesting. In any case, the photo is misleading. Reviewers might think the picture displayed in the nomination will replace the other one with a link. Whereas it is the contrary -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:45, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
- Fixed. ★ 11:29, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
- The rythme generated by the curved light rail is also visually much more interesting. In any case, the photo is misleading. Reviewers might think the picture displayed in the nomination will replace the other one with a link. Whereas it is the contrary -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:45, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
- Keep Too tight crop, and the curved light rail playing with the curved façade has disappeared. Composition and rythme more interesting in the promoted version -- Basile Morin (talk) 23:30, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
- Keep per Basile Morin, left version with curved light strings seems better.--MZaplotnik(talk) 16:45, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- Neutral A stalemate; each image has got its advantages. Perspective, colours and atmosphere may be better in the 2014 version, but the 2012 version has a better left crop and that great curved light rail. One could want to feature both of them, but for that they are too similar. – Aristeas (talk) 07:32, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 8 Jun 2024 at 09:43:50 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Sculptures#Reliefs
- InfoRelief, carved with the effigy of Ste Cécile represented with her zither, to the right of the portal of the Saint-Martin church. Oxelaëre (Nord, Fr).
all by me -- Pierre André (talk) 09:43, 30 May 2024 (UTC) - Support -- Pierre André (talk) 09:43, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Nice composition. ★ 16:28, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 21:01, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 7 Jun 2024 at 21:15:39 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family : Ploceidae (Weavers)
- Info No FPs of this species. I think the garden tree may be an exotic. All by Charlesjsharp -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:15, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:15, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support - WildMouse76 (talk) 03:37, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 16:22, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 09:33, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Sorry, but something is off here. I think it's the bird's positioning. It's not facing the camera and we can't really make out it's physique. Had the bird faced the camera in a classic stance, I'd have supported this image. The composition and crop are not a problem if you're wondering. Wolverine XI 11:59, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
- The classic stance image has FP potential, but the nominated image is more dynamic. No idea what you mean by 'not facing the camera'. Classic bird photos have the head in profile; like here. Charlesjsharp (talk) 16:08, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 19:07, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 16:41, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 7 Jun 2024 at 17:20:24 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Sculptures#Reliefs
- Info created, uploaded and nominated by Красный -- Красный wanna talk? 17:20, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Красный wanna talk? 17:20, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 16:23, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support El Golli Mohamed 19:54, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --A.Savin 09:12, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 11:57, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 05:15, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support Nice quality and cut.--Famberhorst (talk) 17:23, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 21:01, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 12:14, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
File:Facóquero común (Phacochoerus africanus), parque nacional del Lago Mburo, Uganda, 2024-02-01, DD 66.jpg
[edit]Voting period ends on 7 Jun 2024 at 14:17:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals/Artiodactyla#Family : Suidae (Pigs)
- Info Common warthog (Phacochoerus africanus), Lake Mburo National Park, Uganda. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 14:17, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 14:17, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 15:50, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Correct focus -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:25, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 16:23, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
- Neutral IMHO, The composition is not at the same level as other FPs of the same class --Wilfredor (talk) 22:05, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 21:01, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cool animal, very good quality. – Aristeas (talk) 07:27, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 7 Jun 2024 at 13:19:24 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Anseriformes#Genus : Anas
- Info created and uploaded by Alpsdake - nominated by TKsdik8900 -- TKsdik8900 (talk) 13:19, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- TKsdik8900 (talk) 13:19, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 16:24, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 00:13, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Красный wanna talk? 07:29, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Not sharp. --Kadellar (talk) 11:18, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 6 Jun 2024 at 18:47:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Uzbekistan
- Info created and uploaded by Arina Pan - nominated by Красный -- Красный wanna talk? 18:47, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Красный wanna talk? 18:47, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 02:48, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 16:25, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 00:13, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 08:45, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 15:26, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 15:36, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 12:11, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Most of the image is not sharp enough in full resolution for FP --Milseburg (talk) 19:49, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
- Weak support I’d wish the focus point was a bit further away from the camera, right now the background is indeed a bit soft; but considering the resolution I think it’s still OK, and overall it’s such a beautiful scene. – Aristeas (talk) 07:26, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
File:Falesia Nome e Cognome2.jpg, featured
[edit]Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 6 Jun 2024 at 02:27:57 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Italy#Sicily
- Info: rock climbers at the Nome e Cognome crag; all by -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 02:27, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 02:27, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- Comment I would try to clone out the power line in the background --Llez (talk) 15:43, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- @Llez: Done --The Cosmonaut (talk) 00:13, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 05:09, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support —Bruce1eetalk 10:35, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 15:11, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 15:35, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 17:27, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support El Golli Mohamed 15:55, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Aristeas (talk) 07:20, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
File:Chiesa di San Michele, Savoca.jpg, not featured
[edit]Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 6 Jun 2024 at 02:27:44 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious_buildings#Italy
- Info Saint Michael Church, Savoca, Sicily; all by -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 02:27, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 02:27, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 08:57, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 12:22, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:43, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 14:19, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 06:19, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Sorry, no wow IMO. —kallerna (talk) 07:10, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Very good light, but just a QI in my opinion, because the architecture is not exceptional. Flat façades -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:56, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose per Basile. Красный wanna talk? 13:42, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support I can appreciate this sturdy old building.--Famberhorst (talk) 15:24, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Building itself is not ugly, but looks ugly because distortion correction is too strong IMHO. -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 00:24, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
- What do you mean by "too strong"? It is conventional to ensure that the verticals are vertical for architectural photos. To the extent it is even possible for this very old building, which has survived numerous earthquakes, so none of the verticals are actually perfect. --The Cosmonaut (talk) 15:06, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
- I believe that the desire to make verticals vertical should not be an end in itself. I think it is much more important that the objects in the photo look natural as in real life and not resemble broken cardboard toys. -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 04:05, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
- And in real life most buildings are in fact vertical, and we see them as such. This is hardly a good candidate for some sort of vertical vanishing point effect. --The Cosmonaut (talk) 04:30, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
- Well, you're free to have your opinion and I'm free to have mine. -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 05:11, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
- And in real life most buildings are in fact vertical, and we see them as such. This is hardly a good candidate for some sort of vertical vanishing point effect. --The Cosmonaut (talk) 04:30, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
- I believe that the desire to make verticals vertical should not be an end in itself. I think it is much more important that the objects in the photo look natural as in real life and not resemble broken cardboard toys. -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 04:05, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
- What do you mean by "too strong"? It is conventional to ensure that the verticals are vertical for architectural photos. To the extent it is even possible for this very old building, which has survived numerous earthquakes, so none of the verticals are actually perfect. --The Cosmonaut (talk) 15:06, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support El Golli Mohamed 07:40, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Per Basile Morin. -- Karelj (talk) 09:51, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 20:48, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
- Question to @The Cosmonaut: where's your Nikon D3300? ★ 01:03, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
- I noticed that for the well-lit scenes that don't require zoom, its image quality is not superior to my phone's. --The Cosmonaut (talk) 03:05, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Actually not enough wow in my eyes.--Ermell (talk) 13:54, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
秀逸除外候補
[edit]Featured picture candidates
[edit]Voting period ends on 15 Jun 2024 at 07:06:24 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious buildings/Ceilings#Germany
- Info Coat of arms and portrait of Cardinal Augustin Bea, ceiling painting, parish church St. Genesius, Riedböhringen, Baden-Württemberg, Germany; created by Llez - uploaded by Llez - nominated by Llez -- Llez (talk) 07:06, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Llez (talk) 07:06, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
File:Close wing mud-puddling position of Prioneris thestylis (Doubleday, 1842) - Spotted Sawtooth 1.jpg
[edit]Voting period ends on 15 Jun 2024 at 04:04:57 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera#Family : Pieridae (Whites and Sulphurs)
- Info created by Atanu Bose Photography - uploaded by Atanu Bose Photography - nominated by Atudu -- Atudu (talk) 04:04, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Atudu (talk) 04:04, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 15 Jun 2024 at 03:56:01 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Portugal
- Info: Caldeira Grande, Furnas, Azores; all by -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 03:56, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 03:56, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 15 Jun 2024 at 03:53:17 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Architectural_elements#Doors
- Info: portal of the Saint Michael Church, Savoca, Sicily; all by -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 03:53, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 03:53, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 14 Jun 2024 at 14:47:52 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods#Family : Tettigoniidae (Katydids or Bush Crickets)
- Info created - uploaded - nominated by Berthold Werner -- Berthold Werner (talk) 14:47, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- Neutral -- Berthold Werner (talk) 14:47, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose 90 % of the picture is blurred because only the head is in focus. And the animal is bad cropped. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 19:00, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose The crop doesn't sit right with me. Wolverine XI 21:53, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 14 Jun 2024 at 11:45:44 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Tanzania
- Info created by Giles Laurent - uploaded by Giles Laurent - nominated by Giles Laurent -- Giles Laurent (talk) 11:45, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 11:45, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Good light and colors but nothing seems to be really in focus. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 18:28, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you for your message. The focus was at infinity. The house on the hill for example seems in clear focus to me. Maybe because of the huge resolution of the file it was still rendering when you zoomed in? -- Giles Laurent (talk) 19:39, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support Very atmospheric. The mountain and also most of the trees on the plain are in focus. I guess the impression of softness is just due to some haze which may be inevitable at these distances. – Aristeas (talk) 06:58, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 14 Jun 2024 at 10:29:53 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals#Family : Macropodidae (Macropods)
- Info No FPs of the subspecies endemic to Tasmania. All by Charlesjsharp -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 10:29, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 10:29, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support I see it hopping...Wolverine XI 21:50, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 04:01, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 14 Jun 2024 at 05:29:37 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors#France
- Info created by ComputerHotline - uploaded by ComputerHotline - nominated by ComputerHotline -- ComputerHotline (talk) 05:29, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- ComputerHotline (talk) 05:29, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Harsh light at right. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 19:24, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Poor technically with very bad lighting. Wolverine XI 21:51, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 14 Jun 2024 at 05:28:12 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors#France
- Info created by ComputerHotline - uploaded by ComputerHotline - nominated by ComputerHotline -- ComputerHotline (talk) 05:28, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- ComputerHotline (talk) 05:28, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Support★ 13:12, 5 June 2024 (UTC)- There're many lens flares on the photo. ★ 15:53, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 13 Jun 2024 at 20:45:13 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Fish#Family : Muraenidae (Moray Eels)
- Info Ribbon eel (Rhinomuraena quaesita), Anilao, Philippines. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 20:45, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 20:45, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 13:12, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 04:01, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 06:57, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 13 Jun 2024 at 18:57:23 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/In their habitats#Carnivora (Carnivores)
- Info Domestic cat. All by-- Shagil Kannur (talk) 18:57, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Shagil Kannur (talk) 18:57, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Need more DoF, the other cat is important too --Wilfredor (talk) 22:03, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Per Wilfredor. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 22:29, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Cute cats, but sorry, the image has a number of issues in addition to the DoF that Wilfredor pointed out. The colors are quite oversaturated and most of the greens have maximum saturation. The left cat is supposed to be in focus but is not very sharp and seems to have been aggressively sharpened in post. Domestic cats are extremely commonly photographed animals so the bar for an outstanding photo is very high in my opinion. dllu (t,c) 03:33, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- Comment It looks a little overprocessed too. ★ 15:38, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- I withdraw my nomination --Shagil Kannur (talk) 04:46, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 13 Jun 2024 at 17:34:09
- Info The image quality is significantly worse than existing FP File:Mount Rushmore detail view.jpg. It is only a tenth of the resolution in each dimension not to mention worse dynamic range and detail. (Original nomination)
- Delist -- dllu (t,c) 17:34, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- Keep This wouldn't be promoted now, after someone has uploaded a 600 megapixel behemoth view of the same subject, but on its own it doesn't fall short enough of FPC standards to need delisting. It's not like this is is VIC, where there can only be one image per subject. — Rhododendrites talk | 20:27, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- Keep as the original nominator. ★ 21:27, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 13 Jun 2024 at 17:27:11 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Sculptures#Statues_outdoors
- Info created by dllu - uploaded by dllu - nominated by Dllu -- dllu (t,c) 17:27, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- dllu (t,c) 17:27, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 13:11, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 06:57, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 13 Jun 2024 at 16:34:18 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family : Laniidae (Shrikes)
- Info created by skander zarrad - uploaded by skander zarrad - nominated by Skander zarrad -- Skander zarrad (talk) 16:34, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Skander zarrad (talk) 16:34, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- Comment This other image from Tunisia is not quite FP but I much prefer it to this nomination. Charlesjsharp (talk) 19:14, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 13 Jun 2024 at 12:16:00 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Photo techniques/Styles and Techniques#Others (It is a combination of light painting and ICM)
- Info created and uploaded by Ibirapuera - nominated by ★ -- ★ 12:16, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- ★ 12:16, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support El Golli Mohamed 13:26, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support Good fow factor. --Podzemnik (talk) 02:15, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:17, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 04:21, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 06:42, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 09:40, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:33, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support Resolution could be better, really good composition. --XRay 💬 14:26, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- WildMouse76 (talk) 21:09, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 06:56, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 13 Jun 2024 at 12:15:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Photo techniques/Styles and Techniques#Abstract
- Info created by Lunna Campos - uploaded by Sturm - nominated by ★ -- ★ 12:15, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- ★ 12:15, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support El Golli Mohamed 13:28, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Symmetrical impression could be better. --XRay 💬 14:26, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- Yes of course, but the arrangement of the elements doesn't appear to be symmetrical, so there's not much to do. ★ 15:41, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 06:55, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 13 Jun 2024 at 11:51:10 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Cityscapes#Germany
- Info all by MB-one -- MB-one (talk) 11:51, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- MB-one (talk) 11:51, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Very low resolution by modern standards especially for an architectural subject; and the composition could be better in my opinion. For example, the way a lamp post in the foreground is occluding one of the main pylons of the bridge. dllu (t,c) 17:18, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 13 Jun 2024 at 10:06:38 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera#Family : Pieridae (Whites and Sulphurs)
- Info created by El Golli Mohamed - uploaded by El Golli Mohamed - nominated by El Golli Mohamed -- El Golli Mohamed (talk) 10:06, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- El Golli Mohamed (talk) 10:06, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Berthold Werner (talk) 11:52, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 14:50, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:18, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 11:48, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:32, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support All relevant areas are naturally in focus without artificial oversharpening. Attractive subject. -- Radomianin (talk) 05:38, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 06:54, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 13 Jun 2024 at 08:40:47 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals#Family : Cercopithecidae (Old World Monkeys)
- Info Barbary macaque father and mother with baby; created by Llez| - uploaded by Llez - nominated by Llez -- Llez (talk) 08:40, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Llez (talk) 08:40, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose technically a good shot, but not outstanding to me. Especially the shadow in the background doesn't help. --MB-one (talk) 11:55, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose No focus on the eyes, and the shadows are quite annoying. Wolverine XI 14:49, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Shadow in the background, I'd also prefer lower point of view. --Podzemnik (talk) 02:14, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- Weak supportThe shadows are a downside, but the baby steals the show.--Famberhorst (talk) 04:24, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 13 Jun 2024 at 05:31:48 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Australia#Victoria
- Info created and uploaded by Faj2323 - nominated by WildMouse76 -- WildMouse76 (talk) 05:31, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- WildMouse76 (talk) 05:31, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- -donald- (talk) 06:55, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 07:46, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support El Golli Mohamed 10:14, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Berthold Werner (talk) 11:53, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MB-one (talk) 11:54, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 12:02, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 12:15, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 14:50, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:24, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 11:48, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:31, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --XRay 💬 14:27, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 05:28, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 06:54, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 13 Jun 2024 at 01:41:47
- Info all by Łukasz [Wolf] Golowanow (talk). Commons:Featured_pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Air_transport#Military_jet_aircraft. Not very sharp. Compare to this image by the same author, which is better in every way: File:F-16_Demo_Team_2722.jpg (Original nomination)
- Delist -- Schierbecker (talk) 01:41, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- Keep (was: {{FPX}}) Sorry, but only two active nominations by the same user are allowed. – Aristeas (talk) 07:00, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- Comment @Aristeas: this is not exactly a nomination. 2804:14D:5C32:4673:DA2:DE21:DDC8:DCF1 04:11, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
- Comment We often say that images are “nominated for delisting” and AFAICR apply the “only two nominations” limit also to delist nominations. However I would be happy to learn that I am wrong.
- Asking some users which were especially interested in rule discussions in the past – @A.Savin, Basile Morin, Charlesjsharp, Rhododendrites, W.carter – and everybody else with FPC experience: Would you say that the “only two active nominations by the same user” limit applies also to delist nominations (as I have assumed here) or would you say that one can nominate as many images for delisting as one wants?
- I would argue that the limit should also apply to delist nominations.
- Formal argument: the rules say “The delisting rules are the same as those for FPs, with voting taking place over the same time period”, so if not stated differently the two nominations limit should also apply to delist nominations.
- Material argument: In past discussions the limit has often been justified by emphasizing (1) that nominations must be discussed carefully (we want quality, not quantity); and (2) that the FP maintenance resources are very limited. IMHO both points apply even a fortiori to delist nominations: (1) they certainly need an especially careful discussion (we all want to avoid arbitrary delisting) and (2) they mean even more work for us maintainers than normal nominations – delisting a FP always requires misc. manual edits.
- How do you see this? Thank you very much for your statements! Best, – Aristeas (talk) 05:35, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 13 Jun 2024 at 00:31:10 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Historical/People#1850-1859
- Info created by Nadar - restored, uploaded, and nominated by Adam Cuerden -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 00:31, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 00:31, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- Question I get that the noise is authentic to the source photograph, but wouldn't it be even better to remove it digitally? --MB-one (talk) 11:59, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- That kind of cleanup tends to give a very unnatural look. (I did spend a great deal of time removing the dust, though) Adam Cuerden (talk) 12:04, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- I agree with Adam. He knows what he is doing. Charlesjsharp (talk) 19:18, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- That kind of cleanup tends to give a very unnatural look. (I did spend a great deal of time removing the dust, though) Adam Cuerden (talk) 12:04, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 19:50, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Aristeas (talk) 07:52, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 06:53, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
File:Su-27UBM Radom 2009 c.JPG (delist)
[edit]Voting period ends on 12 Jun 2024 at 17:55:40
- Info all by Łukasz [Wolf] Golowanow (talk). Grainy. (Original nomination)
- Delist -- Schierbecker (talk) 17:55, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
Thank you for nominating this image. Unfortunately, it does not fall within the Guidelines and is unlikely to succeed for the following reason: Sorry, but only two active nominations by the same user are allowed. | Anyone other than the nominator who disagrees may override this template by changing {{FPX}} to {{FPX contested}} and adding a vote in support. Voting will then continue in the usual way. If not contested within 24 hours, this nomination may be closed. |
– Aristeas (talk) 07:01, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 12 Jun 2024 at 17:02:05 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family_:_Paradisaeidae_(Birds-of-paradise)
- Info created & uploaded by JJ Harrison – nominated by Ivar (talk) 17:02, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Ivar (talk) 17:02, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
- Comment The right side is very blurry. ★ 20:14, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Not one of the rarest birds, though amazing to get a photograph; but so tricky to ignore serious technical shortcomings. I much prefer several of the other images on Commons. Charlesjsharp (talk) 20:48, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Quality is insufficient even for QI. -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 01:59, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose There are many things wrong with this. We got quality, the distracting stuff on the right, technical problems. -- WildMouse76 (talk) 02:02, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
File:Red Arrows Radom 2009 t.JPG (delist)
[edit]Voting period ends on 12 Jun 2024 at 16:40:29
- Info all by Łukasz [Wolf] Golowanow (talk). There is a distressing amount of chromatic aberration in this photo. Commons:Featured_pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Air_transport#Military_jet_aircraft. (Original nomination)
- Delist -- Schierbecker (talk) 16:40, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
- Delist : very blurry --The Cosmonaut (talk) 14:53, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- Delist per nom. --SHB2000 (talk) 06:42, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- Delist Indeed poor quality even for its time. – Aristeas (talk) 07:51, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- Delist per Schierbecker and Aristeas. -- Radomianin (talk) 05:44, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 12 Jun 2024 at 12:04:26 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals#Family : Cercopithecidae (Old World Monkeys)
- Info created by Giles Laurent - uploaded by Giles Laurent - nominated by Giles Laurent -- Giles Laurent (talk) 12:04, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 12:04, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
- Comment For FP this should be identified and categorized as a juvenile Papio anubis Charlesjsharp (talk) 14:57, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
- Done Thanks for the comment, caption, description, category and file name edited -- Giles Laurent (talk) 15:20, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 15:39, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 17:50, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support
JJGiles, you've done it again! --SHB2000 (talk) 21:31, 3 June 2024 (UTC) - Support ★ 12:03, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- WildMouse76 (talk) 13:16, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support No words. Wolverine XI 14:51, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Skander zarrad (talk) 21:18, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:25, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Aristeas (talk) 07:51, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 09:52, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:30, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 05:30, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 06:53, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 12 Jun 2024 at 05:33:46 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera#Family : Nymphalidae (Brush-footed Butterflies)
- Info created by Atanu Bose Photography - uploaded by Atanu Bose Photography - nominated by Atudu -- Atudu (talk) 05:33, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Atudu (talk) 05:33, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support Incredible specimen. Wolverine XI 09:54, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support Great! --Plozessor (talk) 15:53, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 17:50, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Mounir TOUZRI (talk) 23:15, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 07:52, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support Amazing contrast between the butterfly and the background. --MB-one (talk) 12:04, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Rhododendrites talk | 20:28, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Skander zarrad (talk) 21:17, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Aristeas (talk) 07:50, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support Ermell (talk) 09:54, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 11:47, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:29, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support as per MB-one. -- Radomianin (talk) 16:10, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 12 Jun 2024 at 04:43:49 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Charadriiformes#Genus : Vanellus
- Info created and uploaded by Charlesjsharp - nominated by WildMouse76 -- WildMouse76 (talk) 04:43, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- WildMouse76 (talk) 04:43, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Thank you for the nomination. Charlesjsharp (talk) 15:06, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
- @Charlesjsharp Judging by how you replied to this nomination, I'm assuming there's something wrong with the image. Is part of the animal out of focus? I would love to know. -- WildMouse76 (talk) 16:17, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
- Of course it looks lovely at first glance, but I am not sure it has the sharpness and feather definition for FP. Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:39, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
I withdraw my nomination -- WildMouse76 (talk) 01:00, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 12 Jun 2024 at 04:13:25 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects#Other objects in landscapes
- Info Ecocathedral in Mildam municipality of Heerenveen, Part of surplus building material stacked in a special way. (This is a special project that will continue until the year 3000).
All by -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 04:13, 3 June 2024 (UTC) - Support -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 04:13, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 07:51, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose interesting subject and technically a good shot. But the composition and contrast is not FP worthy to me. --MB-one (talk) 12:08, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Pretty boring to say the least. Wolverine XI 14:53, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 11 Jun 2024 at 21:00:03 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Historical/People#1940-1949
- Info created by 京都東 - uploaded by 京都東 - nominated by AESTIVUM -- SekisounoAestivum (talk) 21:00, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- SekisounoAestivum (talk) 21:00, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose File size is too small and very grainy, even for an image in that year -- WildMouse76 (talk) 21:23, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Poor quality and very noisy IMO. Wolverine XI 09:58, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 11 Jun 2024 at 19:32:53 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People#People at work
- Info Lonely Arabian shepherd selling sheep in Ramadan month (street of Marrakesh, far from souk). My shot. --Mile (talk) 19:32, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Mile (talk) 19:32, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Nothing out of the ordinary. Just a man with his sheep. Or am I missing something? Wolverine XI 10:04, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Per Wolverine, also some parts (like the sheep's neck) are blurry without an apparent reason. --Plozessor (talk) 15:55, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose per Wolverine 11. --SHB2000 (talk) 21:31, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support great composition. --MB-one (talk) 12:07, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support: the light is not ideal, but very expressive somehow. --The Cosmonaut (talk) 14:49, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 11 Jun 2024 at 18:47:44 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds#Family_:_Phasianidae_(Grouse,_Partridges,_Peafowl,_Pheasants,_Quail,_Turkeys)
- Info all by Tuxyso -- Tuxyso (talk) 18:47, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Tuxyso (talk) 18:47, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Sorry, insufficient compositional quality for a common animal. Part of the organism is obscured and the background is busy. dllu (t,c) 22:09, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Distracting back- and foreground, and subject in shadow, sorry. BigDom (talk) 02:08, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Beautiful peafowl but a less than stellar composition. Wolverine XI 10:06, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support El Golli Mohamed 15:54, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose per others -- WildMouse76 (talk) 18:30, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 11 Jun 2024 at 18:38:40 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals/Carnivora#Family : Herpestidae (Mongooses)
- Comment Banded mongoose (mungos mungo)
- Info all by Tuxyso -- Tuxyso (talk) 18:38, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Tuxyso (talk) 18:38, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 20:36, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
- Weak support Correct focus with acceptable DoF, nice composition and the subject is well lit, but I find the bright spot top left a little distracting. BigDom (talk) 02:14, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
- Weak oppose I'd prefer the background to be all black. Wolverine XI 10:08, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 15:40, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support El Golli Mohamed 15:52, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- WildMouse76 (talk) 18:31, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 20:49, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 07:49, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Aristeas (talk) 07:49, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:28, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 11 Jun 2024 at 15:32:11 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Towers
- Info created by Jmh2o - uploaded by Jmh2o - nominated by Jmh2o -- JmH2O(talk) 15:32, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
- Abstain As author. -- JmH2O(talk) 15:32, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Pleasant composition with nice light but IMO not outstanding shot. Maybe a lower point of view with more road and less sky would work better. --Podzemnik (talk) 02:18, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
File:Vellereille-les-Brayeux - Abbaye de Bonne-Espérance - vue depuis la cour d'honneur - 2023-09-23 - 01.jpg
[edit]Voting period ends on 11 Jun 2024 at 14:27:21 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious_buildings#Belgium
- Info created by Jmh2o - uploaded by Jmh2o - nominated by Jmh2o -- JmH2O(talk) 14:27, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
- Abstain As author. --JmH2O(talk) 15:17, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
- Neutral very slightly leaning out and sharpness could be better. --MB-one (talk) 12:13, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Nice quality but the light is quite ordinary. Dark trees with the right wing in the shade makes the photo looks unbalanced - too bright on the left, too dark on the right. --Podzemnik (talk) 02:20, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 11 Jun 2024 at 13:29:19 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Other#United States
- Info Bluebells (Hyacinthoides non-scripta) - pretty park scene at the botanical garden. I looked up the origin of that odd "non-scripta" name. It's a mythology reference. When Hyacinthus was accidentally killed, a flower grew from his blood and Apollo's tears marked the letters AIAI on the petals. Basically this is saying "not the kind of hyacinth that has letters on it". all by — Rhododendrites talk | 13:29, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Rhododendrites talk | 13:29, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support —Bruce1eetalk 14:03, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 15:59, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- WildMouse76 (talk) 17:30, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
- Comment any reason to cut the road, could start from edge.--Mile (talk) 19:42, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
- You mean crop out the mulch path on the right? No, I would not want to do that. I like the composition. — Rhododendrites talk | 13:27, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support El Golli Mohamed 11:32, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 12:21, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 17:52, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 07:48, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 12:04, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support Beautiful. – Aristeas (talk) 07:48, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:26, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 11 Jun 2024 at 13:07:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Objects#Clothing and textiles
- Info Jun Takahashi dress for Undercover, spring/summer 2024. Featured in the Metropolitan Museum of Art exhibition "Sleeping Beauties: Reawakening Fashion". A different version of this dress got some attention when it was worn to this year's Met Gala. all by — Rhododendrites talk | 13:07, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Rhododendrites talk | 13:07, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support Who should wear something like that?--Ermell (talk) 13:37, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 15:50, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support No idea how and who should wear it, but it works as a beautiful, aesthetic art object. Well captured! -- Radomianin (talk) 16:02, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 12:21, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 15:42, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 17:53, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 18:44, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 07:43, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MB-one (talk) 12:13, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cool image. Wolverine XI 14:54, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Radomianin. – Aristeas (talk) 07:47, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:25, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --XRay 💬 14:27, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 11 Jun 2024 at 09:10:45 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family_:_Corvidae_(Crows,_Jays_and_Magpies)
- Info A raven, Corvus corax, standing in a puddle at Bonny Doon Beach in Davenport, California. Renominated since the previous nomination got no feedback. created by Grendelkhan - uploaded by Grendelkhan - nominated by Grendelkhan -- grendel|khan 09:10, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- grendel|khan 09:10, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Sorry you didn't get feedback on the last one. Once in a while we'll see a photo that isn't quite up to anyone's standards for Featured Picture, but also isn't particularly bad enough to oppose. An all-black subject is very difficult to photograph, and while you've done a pretty good job here, the level of detail just isn't up to what people expect for birds at FPC. From looking at the ground, it looks like the focus might be just slightly past the bird. A smaller focus window and faster shutter might help. Some people might find the background a little off-putting, too (there's a lot of personal preference involved here). So in short I think you have a good photo that could be helpful to illustrate a common raven, but it's probably not going to work for Featured Picture. — Rhododendrites talk | 13:45, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose I don't see an outstanding photo - quality, composition, and light are all good but not FP good to me. The left tight crop makes the photo look unbalanced. --Podzemnik (talk) 02:23, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 10 Jun 2024 at 15:55:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media/People#Paintings
- Info created by John Taylor / National Portrait Gallery, uploaded and nominated by Yann
- Support Not very high resolution, but good reproduction of a famous painting. FP on English WP. -- Yann (talk) 15:55, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Sorry, but the quality is very low. I suggest restoring then nominating it again. Wolverine XI 19:57, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
- This is a historical painting, so we usually do not edit it. This one is more than 400 years old, so the cracks are a normal feature in this case. Yann (talk) 19:27, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 10 Jun 2024 at 15:49:19 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People/Portrait#Women
- Info created by Hernan Irastorza, uploaded by Jeff G., nominated by Yann
- Info Ruben Andon: Make up, Body art & hair: Barbara Rizzuti
- Support Artsy portrait. -- Yann (talk) 15:49, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Rainbow? No. Charlesjsharp (talk) 14:49, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Rhododendrites talk | 17:25, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support Striking! -- Radomianin (talk) 19:11, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
- Strong support Perfectly in time for June :-). --SHB2000 (talk) 00:09, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Not a good file name per Commons guidelines. Please think of such things before you create nominations. Something like "Woman with rainbow-hued body makeup" would be better. Plus the description is inadequate, I'll fix that one for you. --Cart (talk) 09:46, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
- @W.carter: OK for renaming it after closure. I don't think it is that urgently necessary to do it now. Yann (talk) 18:17, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
- No urgency per se, but people may be more inclined to support the nom if everything is top notch for it, plus nominators tend to forget such "minor" things once they've got their star. --Cart (talk) 18:23, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
- @W.carter: OK for renaming it after closure. I don't think it is that urgently necessary to do it now. Yann (talk) 18:17, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose This image is technically fine, but I don't like the left-leaning nature of the subject. A centered subject is preferable, and a more expressive face is desirable. Overall, not FP in my eyes. Wolverine XI 10:18, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks for your review, Wolverine XI. As far as I know, this kind of image composition is often used in documentaries to create suspense and attention. The usual harmonious placement on the right would be the less conspicuous standard. -- Radomianin (talk) 12:35, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
Support-- Giles Laurent (talk) 12:20, 3 June 2024 (UTC)- Comment: there are a bunch of artifacts along the upper edge of the table that need to be fixed. --The Cosmonaut (talk) 15:38, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
- True there's a weird rectangle and an unexplainable blurred orange zone close to it. I will support again once it's fixed. -- Giles Laurent (talk) 15:41, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
- Improvement done (3rd editing) (SwissTransfer link) @Jeff G., Yann, The Cosmonaut, and Giles Laurent: I have removed the above mentioned artifacts and probably unnatural appearing editing marks. If you are satisfied with the improvement after checking, you are welcome to use this version for an update. Best regards, -- Radomianin (talk) 17:02, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
- Much better thank you! There seems to still be a blurry area close to her right shoulder (so the shoulder that appears on left on the image). There is also a blurry area close to the thumb and close to the other hand. Also, I'm wondering, is it over a table that she's placing her arms or is just a soft surface? Because it is a bit strange how the sort of white table is extremely linear just bellow the body but on the left it becomes a bit wavy (so I think it's a soft surface but that there was a white rectangle applied in postproduction bellow the body) -- Giles Laurent (talk) 17:16, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
- Done Thanks for the quick feedback, Giles. The messy spot on her right shoulder has been fixed and the link above has been updated with the 2nd edit. As for the table, I think it's either a soft blanket or a mattress that the model is resting her elbows on. The area in the middle at chest height was probably straightened afterwards by the creator. Best, -- Radomianin (talk) 18:25, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
- @Jeff G., Radomianin, The Cosmonaut, and Giles Laurent: I uploaded the version edited by Radomianin. Yann (talk) 18:17, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Thanks for the update, Yann. Sorry I wasn't that fast :) Updated the link above: I removed the messy spot on the right shoulder that Giles mentioned. I'll leave it up to you if you want to do another update. If so, thanks in advance :) -- Radomianin (talk) 18:25, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
- Done Yann (talk) 19:11, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
- Dear Yann, unfortunately in my haste I forgot to edit two spots mentioned by Giles, namely those on the right thumb and the left hand. I apologize that you have to take action again, but you can wait until tomorrow after Giles has checked again. I think all the spots are fixed now. The link above has been updated. It's the best we can do to rescue the nomination :) Sincerely, -- Radomianin (talk) 20:18, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you and very good job Radomianin! I support the third edited version with the hands blur fixed that I guess will be uploaded soon to update the actual version Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 20:25, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
- Done Yann (talk) 20:24, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- Dear Yann, unfortunately in my haste I forgot to edit two spots mentioned by Giles, namely those on the right thumb and the left hand. I apologize that you have to take action again, but you can wait until tomorrow after Giles has checked again. I think all the spots are fixed now. The link above has been updated. It's the best we can do to rescue the nomination :) Sincerely, -- Radomianin (talk) 20:18, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support: much better. --The Cosmonaut (talk) 19:27, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 21:29, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support Many thanks for your improvements, Radomianin! – Aristeas (talk) 07:46, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --XRay 💬 14:28, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 10 Jun 2024 at 14:14:25 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Transport#Train stations
- Info created by Plozessor - uploaded by Plozessor - nominated by Plozessor -- Plozessor (talk) 14:14, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Not exceptional in any way. Wolverine XI 19:59, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
NeutralNice but tilted at the top. ★ 00:42, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
- @ArionStar: Sure? The roof is crooked. The picture is straight as can be seen from the handrail. Or are you referring to something else? --Plozessor (talk) 03:46, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
- The roof. ★ 14:15, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
- The ceiling (ceiling/teto is what you see inside a building, and a roof/telhado is what you see from the outside) is not horizontal, it is leaning and it is higher on the right side than the left side. There is nothing the photographer can do about it; unless he brings in a building team and have them reconstructing the station. --Cart (talk) 15:43, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
- Ok. Support ★ 15:52, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
- Thx Cart for the clarification! Yes, the ceiling is crooked, though I think that this is because the roof is crooked ;) --Plozessor (talk) 18:25, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support after clarification. --SHB2000 (talk) 00:10, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
- The ceiling (ceiling/teto is what you see inside a building, and a roof/telhado is what you see from the outside) is not horizontal, it is leaning and it is higher on the right side than the left side. There is nothing the photographer can do about it; unless he brings in a building team and have them reconstructing the station. --Cart (talk) 15:43, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
- @ArionStar: Sure? The roof is crooked. The picture is straight as can be seen from the handrail. Or are you referring to something else? --Plozessor (talk) 03:46, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support Clean work on a difficult object. Thanks to Cart for the analysis :) -- Radomianin (talk) 17:11, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support: I can see where Remedy Entertainment got inspiration for the Oldest House... --The Cosmonaut (talk) 15:45, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 07:41, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support Interesting contemporain architecture with concrete and space, and not easy to capture without any people. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 07:44, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Sebring12Hrs --MB-one (talk) 12:15, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- Comment If the disruptive moiré on the escalators and the cut-off entrance are removed, I am also in favour.--Ermell (talk) 10:06, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 10 Jun 2024 at 09:37:48 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media/Maps#Maps of Europe
- Info created and uploaded by Kevinpaulscarrott - nominated by SHB2000 --SHB2000 (talk) 09:37, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support This has got to be one of the best city directory maps created by a Commons user out there. --SHB2000 (talk) 09:37, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
- Question There seem to be quite a few problems with the detail; naturally maps are all about accurate detail. It needs consistency of use of Norwegian/English (e.g. Gata/Gate; use of Ceramist (a person) as opposed to Ceramics/Pottery). Accommodation should be Hotel. Huset Vart seems to be a shopping centre in a converted bicycle factory, not a science factory. Do Norwegians translate Vinmonopolet as Liquor Store; the American term? I've heard them using alcohol store or using vinmonopolet when speaking English. Charlesjsharp (talk) 10:41, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
- Just a note from a Scandi. These days the languages (Norwegian/Swedish/Danish) spoken and written by Scandinavians contain a lot of English words and expressions, and most of us don't know the difference between pure American and British English. We learn and use a hodgepodge from what we pick up in media, films and tv shows, and try to adapt what we say so that people will understand the meaning rather than true translations. It's sort of the Scandi version of Pidgin English. Hence we use the real names of companies like 'Vinmonopolet' (in Sweden, Systembolaget has the same function) when speaking among foreign friends, but terms like 'Liquor Store' when describing it to the public in general. --Cart (talk) 11:18, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
- Whatever it should be called, the Vinmonopolet is nowhere near the shown location from 2022, so you'd never find it using this map. Charlesjsharp (talk) 14:13, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
- Most maps of larger areas are outdated as soon as they are published. --Cart (talk) 14:25, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
- Whatever it should be called, the Vinmonopolet is nowhere near the shown location from 2022, so you'd never find it using this map. Charlesjsharp (talk) 14:13, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
- Just a note from a Scandi. These days the languages (Norwegian/Swedish/Danish) spoken and written by Scandinavians contain a lot of English words and expressions, and most of us don't know the difference between pure American and British English. We learn and use a hodgepodge from what we pick up in media, films and tv shows, and try to adapt what we say so that people will understand the meaning rather than true translations. It's sort of the Scandi version of Pidgin English. Hence we use the real names of companies like 'Vinmonopolet' (in Sweden, Systembolaget has the same function) when speaking among foreign friends, but terms like 'Liquor Store' when describing it to the public in general. --Cart (talk) 11:18, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support El Golli Mohamed 13:24, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Leaning keep, but a few comments/questions: 1) why not go with the svg version? 2) It looks like File:City map stavanger.svg is the user's masterwork (in its 24th edition!). 3) Since it looks like the creator regularly updates these, does promoting it to FP prevent that updating? Would it have to be a separate file? I would support a rare exception to the prohibition on changing FPs once they're promoted in a case like this, since updates are likely just going to make it more accurate (and remove mistakes/out of date locations). — Rhododendrites talk | 17:23, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 10 Jun 2024 at 06:41:46 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Food and drink#Sweet food
- Info created and uploaded by Shitadevi - nominated by Desertasad -- Desertasad (talk) 06:41, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Desertasad (talk) 06:41, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
- Question Could you please add a description in English (even with Google Translate, native speakers will fix it if needed). Yann (talk) 14:51, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
- I've made an attempt at machine translation but it's up to native speakers to fix it. dllu (t,c) 22:10, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support outstanding. --MB-one (talk) 12:17, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 05:15, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
File:Kue Lumpur Pandan Jajanan Pasar Tradisional (crop).jpg, not featured
[edit]Voting period ends on 10 Jun 2024 at 04:38:03 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Food and drink#Sweet food
- Info created by Alvian Choirur Rozaq - uploaded by Desertasad - nominated by Desertasad -- Desertasad (talk) 04:38, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Desertasad (talk) 04:38, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
- Question Could you please add a description in English (even with Google Translate, native speakers will fix it if needed). Yann (talk) 14:50, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose noticeable noise, even without zoom. -- WildMouse76 (talk) 15:35, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Poor quality and noise. Wolverine XI 20:02, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
File:MiG-29 38.JPG (delist)
[edit]Voting period ends on 10 Jun 2024 at 04:35:18
- Info all by Łukasz [Wolf] Golowanow (talk). Commons:Featured_pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Air_transport#Military_jet_aircraft It's a grainy image of the undercarriage of a fighter jet. We've all seen one before. (Original nomination)
- Delist -- Schierbecker (talk) 04:35, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
- Delist per nom. --SHB2000 (talk) 09:38, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
- Delist per nominator. Красный wanna talk? 19:30, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
- Delist per nom -- WildMouse76 (talk) 21:45, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
- Weak keep: I feel this can be improved with careful post-processing. --The Cosmonaut (talk) 14:55, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 10 Jun 2024 at 04:36:29 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Towers#France
- Info all by Tournasol7 -- Tournasol7 (talk) 04:36, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
- Abstain As author. Tournasol7 (talk) 04:36, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support Light and composition. The building seems to dominate over the infinite scenery. Nice flowers in the foreground -- Basile Morin (talk) 06:19, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support —Bruce1eetalk 07:35, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 11:35, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:03, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support I love how you captured the tower and the valley it overlooks. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 14:13, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 03:47, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Terragio67 (talk) 03:49, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support for image composition, lighting, and color mood. -- Radomianin (talk) 08:05, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --BigDom (talk) 10:11, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Llez (talk) 11:25, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 17:14, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support Beautiful -- Giles Laurent (talk) 12:19, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Berthold Werner (talk) 15:20, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Milseburg (talk) 19:51, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support Lovely flowers. Wolverine XI 14:56, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Frank and Radomianin. – Aristeas (talk) 07:43, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support Ermell (talk) 10:10, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 10 Jun 2024 at 04:18:04 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious_buildings#China
- Info created by dllu - uploaded by dllu - nominated by Dllu -- dllu (t,c) 04:18, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- dllu (t,c) 04:18, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
- Why does the water appear very grainy? --SHB2000 (talk) 04:20, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
- I can only see slight grain when pixel peeping the 100 megapixel image, which I don't find distracting at all. Are you perhaps referring to the ripples reflecting the sky? dllu (t,c) 05:06, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
- Maybe – I'll wait and see what others have to say. --SHB2000 (talk) 09:39, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
- Those mini-ripples on the water look fine to me. It's what you get when you have a breeze blowing on a lake with no rolling waves. --Cart (talk) 13:18, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
- Fair enough – Support. --SHB2000 (talk) 08:54, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
- Those mini-ripples on the water look fine to me. It's what you get when you have a breeze blowing on a lake with no rolling waves. --Cart (talk) 13:18, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
- Maybe – I'll wait and see what others have to say. --SHB2000 (talk) 09:39, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
Support Desertasad (talk) 05:11, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
- Sorry, but per the header, only "[e]ditors whose accounts have at least 10 days and 50 edits can vote." Your account only has 24 edits as of 09:40, 1 June 2024 (UTC). --SHB2000 (talk) 09:40, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support Wow, that is super high resolution. Toadspike (talk) 06:31, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 22:39, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support LGTM -- WildMouse76 (talk) 04:18, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Llez (talk) 11:25, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
- Weak oppose Resokution is great and the motif interesting, but the lighting and composition/POV are not at FP level for me. Poco a poco (talk) 12:29, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
Oppose Pretty uninteresting light and strangely washed out colours on the building. The sharpness could also be better.--Ermell (talk) 13:46, 2 June 2024 (UTC)- I agree about the light. Regrettably, the sky was hazy. The colors are slightly washed out since it's very far away, but I've already applied aggressive dehazing compared to the original [2]. I'm surprised to see sharpness being mentioned since the sharpness seems fine to me on the 100 megapixel photo except perhaps for the extreme corners of the image. dllu (t,c) 20:20, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
- Comment To be fair, I was wrong about the sharpness.--Ermell (talk) 10:15, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose per Poco an Ermell. --Milseburg (talk) 19:38, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 9 Jun 2024 at 19:59:13 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds#Family : Podicipedidae (Grebes)
- Info created by El Golli Mohamed - uploaded by El Golli Mohamed - nominated by El Golli Mohamed -- El Golli Mohamed (talk) 19:59, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- El Golli Mohamed (talk) 19:59, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Weak support I think the center side of the organism is a bit out of focus. -- WildMouse76 (talk) 21:31, 31 May 2024 (UTC)- Support -- WildMouse76 (talk) 09:35, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 23:52, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 03:48, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Llez (talk) 11:24, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 13:28, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 12:19, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:20, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 19:39, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 9 Jun 2024 at 18:32:22 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Germany#Bavaria
- Info created by Plozessor - uploaded by Plozessor - nominated by Plozessor -- Plozessor (talk) 18:32, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Amazing! ★ 23:51, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Weak opposefor the purple glare near the sun, sorry -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:57, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
- @Basile Morin: Tried to fix that purple glare, please take another look. --Plozessor (talk) 04:46, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
- Still something, but almost gone - Basile Morin (talk) 06:13, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
- @Basile Morin: Updated it once more. --Plozessor (talk) 14:34, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support Good now El Golli Mohamed 07:10, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Sorry, yes nice autumn but otherwise nothing special for me. --A.Savin 08:50, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support Contre-jour very well handled. --MB-one (talk) 12:20, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support Beautiful autumn scenery. It could be worth trying to brighten up it further – underexposing was necessary here, but is to be compensated in post-processing. Of course it’s a matter of taste how bright it should get … – Aristeas (talk) 07:40, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 16:43, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 9 Jun 2024 at 17:39:17 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Chile
- Info created by Pedro Szekely - uploaded by JustEMV - nominated by JustEMV -- JustEMV (talk) 17:39, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- JustEMV (talk) 17:39, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 19:42, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Oppose The cloud obscuring parts of the mountain isn't visually appealing IMO. Also, the quality of the mountains isn't worthy of a FP, especially when the resolution and size are near 20 MB -- WildMouse76 (talk)20:59, 31 May 2024 (UTC)- Neutral Now that I think about it, the fog isn't really a problem. I'm still disturbed by the quality of the mountains. -- WildMouse76 (talk) 15:03, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support I think that is precisely the theme, excellent cover for the book "the fog" --Wilfredor (talk) 17:02, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you for your feedback! Personally, I believe the clouds add drama and enhance the scene :) JustEMV (talk) 01:18, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- Neutral a bit much noise. Otherwise FP worthy. --MB-one (talk) 12:21, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 19:46, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support I like the scene. It's true that the quality of the mountains could be better, but there are many details in the foreground. --Harlock81 (talk) 10:40, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 9 Jun 2024 at 15:21:47 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Castles and fortifications#Croatia
- Info all by Tournasol7 -- Tournasol7 (talk) 15:21, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
- Abstain As author. Tournasol7 (talk) 15:21, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 19:41, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
- Weak oppose Main subject in the shadow. And low wow factor in my view because the architecture is not incredible -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:46, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support El Golli Mohamed 07:10, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 03:46, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 05:13, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Llez (talk) 11:22, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support somehow --Mile (talk) 19:38, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 12:18, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 20:52, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support Works for me. – Aristeas (talk) 07:35, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:23, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
File:La Défense, Paris April 2012.jpg (delist)
[edit]Voting period ends on 9 Jun 2024 at 00:50:50
→
- Info Blown-out/overexposed sky on the horizon; replacing to File:La Défense at night, 24 June 2014.jpg (Original nomination)
- Delist and replace -- ★ 00:50, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
- Delist and replace -- -donald- (talk) 06:04, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Wrong file? this image was promoted, the other is supposed to replace, right? At first sight, the crop at the left was better in the original -- Basile Morin (talk) 09:04, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
- But the photo-processing of the latter is better. ★ 16:16, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
- The rythme generated by the curved light rail is also visually much more interesting. In any case, the photo is misleading. Reviewers might think the picture displayed in the nomination will replace the other one with a link. Whereas it is the contrary -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:45, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
- Fixed. ★ 11:29, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
- The rythme generated by the curved light rail is also visually much more interesting. In any case, the photo is misleading. Reviewers might think the picture displayed in the nomination will replace the other one with a link. Whereas it is the contrary -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:45, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
- Keep Too tight crop, and the curved light rail playing with the curved façade has disappeared. Composition and rythme more interesting in the promoted version -- Basile Morin (talk) 23:30, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
- Keep per Basile Morin, left version with curved light strings seems better.--MZaplotnik(talk) 16:45, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- Neutral A stalemate; each image has got its advantages. Perspective, colours and atmosphere may be better in the 2014 version, but the 2012 version has a better left crop and that great curved light rail. One could want to feature both of them, but for that they are too similar. – Aristeas (talk) 07:32, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 8 Jun 2024 at 09:43:50 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Sculptures#Reliefs
- InfoRelief, carved with the effigy of Ste Cécile represented with her zither, to the right of the portal of the Saint-Martin church. Oxelaëre (Nord, Fr).
all by me -- Pierre André (talk) 09:43, 30 May 2024 (UTC) - Support -- Pierre André (talk) 09:43, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Nice composition. ★ 16:28, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 21:01, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 7 Jun 2024 at 21:15:39 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family : Ploceidae (Weavers)
- Info No FPs of this species. I think the garden tree may be an exotic. All by Charlesjsharp -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:15, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:15, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support - WildMouse76 (talk) 03:37, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 16:22, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 09:33, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Sorry, but something is off here. I think it's the bird's positioning. It's not facing the camera and we can't really make out it's physique. Had the bird faced the camera in a classic stance, I'd have supported this image. The composition and crop are not a problem if you're wondering. Wolverine XI 11:59, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
- The classic stance image has FP potential, but the nominated image is more dynamic. No idea what you mean by 'not facing the camera'. Classic bird photos have the head in profile; like here. Charlesjsharp (talk) 16:08, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 19:07, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 16:41, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 7 Jun 2024 at 17:20:24 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Sculptures#Reliefs
- Info created, uploaded and nominated by Красный -- Красный wanna talk? 17:20, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Красный wanna talk? 17:20, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 16:23, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support El Golli Mohamed 19:54, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --A.Savin 09:12, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 11:57, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 05:15, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support Nice quality and cut.--Famberhorst (talk) 17:23, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 21:01, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 12:14, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
File:Facóquero común (Phacochoerus africanus), parque nacional del Lago Mburo, Uganda, 2024-02-01, DD 66.jpg
[edit]Voting period ends on 7 Jun 2024 at 14:17:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals/Artiodactyla#Family : Suidae (Pigs)
- Info Common warthog (Phacochoerus africanus), Lake Mburo National Park, Uganda. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 14:17, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 14:17, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 15:50, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Correct focus -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:25, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 16:23, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
- Neutral IMHO, The composition is not at the same level as other FPs of the same class --Wilfredor (talk) 22:05, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 21:01, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cool animal, very good quality. – Aristeas (talk) 07:27, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 7 Jun 2024 at 13:19:24 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Anseriformes#Genus : Anas
- Info created and uploaded by Alpsdake - nominated by TKsdik8900 -- TKsdik8900 (talk) 13:19, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- TKsdik8900 (talk) 13:19, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 16:24, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 00:13, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Красный wanna talk? 07:29, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Not sharp. --Kadellar (talk) 11:18, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 6 Jun 2024 at 18:47:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Uzbekistan
- Info created and uploaded by Arina Pan - nominated by Красный -- Красный wanna talk? 18:47, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Красный wanna talk? 18:47, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 02:48, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 16:25, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 00:13, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 08:45, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 15:26, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 15:36, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 12:11, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Most of the image is not sharp enough in full resolution for FP --Milseburg (talk) 19:49, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
- Weak support I’d wish the focus point was a bit further away from the camera, right now the background is indeed a bit soft; but considering the resolution I think it’s still OK, and overall it’s such a beautiful scene. – Aristeas (talk) 07:26, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
File:Falesia Nome e Cognome2.jpg, featured
[edit]Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 6 Jun 2024 at 02:27:57 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Italy#Sicily
- Info: rock climbers at the Nome e Cognome crag; all by -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 02:27, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 02:27, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- Comment I would try to clone out the power line in the background --Llez (talk) 15:43, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- @Llez: Done --The Cosmonaut (talk) 00:13, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 05:09, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support —Bruce1eetalk 10:35, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 15:11, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 15:35, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 17:27, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support El Golli Mohamed 15:55, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Aristeas (talk) 07:20, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
File:Chiesa di San Michele, Savoca.jpg, not featured
[edit]Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 6 Jun 2024 at 02:27:44 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious_buildings#Italy
- Info Saint Michael Church, Savoca, Sicily; all by -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 02:27, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 02:27, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 08:57, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 12:22, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:43, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 14:19, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 06:19, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Sorry, no wow IMO. —kallerna (talk) 07:10, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Very good light, but just a QI in my opinion, because the architecture is not exceptional. Flat façades -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:56, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose per Basile. Красный wanna talk? 13:42, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support I can appreciate this sturdy old building.--Famberhorst (talk) 15:24, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Building itself is not ugly, but looks ugly because distortion correction is too strong IMHO. -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 00:24, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
- What do you mean by "too strong"? It is conventional to ensure that the verticals are vertical for architectural photos. To the extent it is even possible for this very old building, which has survived numerous earthquakes, so none of the verticals are actually perfect. --The Cosmonaut (talk) 15:06, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
- I believe that the desire to make verticals vertical should not be an end in itself. I think it is much more important that the objects in the photo look natural as in real life and not resemble broken cardboard toys. -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 04:05, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
- And in real life most buildings are in fact vertical, and we see them as such. This is hardly a good candidate for some sort of vertical vanishing point effect. --The Cosmonaut (talk) 04:30, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
- Well, you're free to have your opinion and I'm free to have mine. -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 05:11, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
- And in real life most buildings are in fact vertical, and we see them as such. This is hardly a good candidate for some sort of vertical vanishing point effect. --The Cosmonaut (talk) 04:30, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
- I believe that the desire to make verticals vertical should not be an end in itself. I think it is much more important that the objects in the photo look natural as in real life and not resemble broken cardboard toys. -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 04:05, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
- What do you mean by "too strong"? It is conventional to ensure that the verticals are vertical for architectural photos. To the extent it is even possible for this very old building, which has survived numerous earthquakes, so none of the verticals are actually perfect. --The Cosmonaut (talk) 15:06, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support El Golli Mohamed 07:40, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Per Basile Morin. -- Karelj (talk) 09:51, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 20:48, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
- Question to @The Cosmonaut: where's your Nikon D3300? ★ 01:03, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
- I noticed that for the well-lit scenes that don't require zoom, its image quality is not superior to my phone's. --The Cosmonaut (talk) 03:05, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Actually not enough wow in my eyes.--Ermell (talk) 13:54, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
タイムテーブル (推薦から5日後)
[edit]Sat 01 Jun → Thu 06 Jun Sun 02 Jun → Fri 07 Jun Mon 03 Jun → Sat 08 Jun Tue 04 Jun → Sun 09 Jun Wed 05 Jun → Mon 10 Jun Thu 06 Jun → Tue 11 Jun
タイムテーブル (推薦から10日後)
[edit]Mon 27 May → Thu 06 Jun Tue 28 May → Fri 07 Jun Wed 29 May → Sat 08 Jun Thu 30 May → Sun 09 Jun Fri 31 May → Mon 10 Jun Sat 01 Jun → Tue 11 Jun Sun 02 Jun → Wed 12 Jun Mon 03 Jun → Thu 13 Jun Tue 04 Jun → Fri 14 Jun Wed 05 Jun → Sat 15 Jun Thu 06 Jun → Sun 16 Jun