Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Cathédrale Saint Julien du Mans.jpg/2
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Cathédrale Saint Julien du Mans.jpg, not featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 16 Nov 2023 at 11:05:32 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious_buildings#France
Info created by Yannig Photo - uploaded by Yannig72 - nominated by Yannig72 -- Yannig Photo (talk) 11:05, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
Support -- Yannig Photo (talk) 11:05, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
Oppose. The crop is too tight, the building is not straight up, and there is a strange brownish tint. Not enough light in shadows too. Podstawko ●talk 12:15, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
- Thank you for your comments. With this photo I wanted to highlight the low light of the autumn sky (the last ray of sunshine) on this building. I could have avoided the perspective effect by enlarging the shot, but then there would have been buses, cars, road signs, etc. My point of view was to have the cathedral alone. Yannig Photo (talk) 15:45, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
- Oppose Agree with Podstawko --Jay.Jarosz (talk) 12:56, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
- Oppose Not sharp enough. Why this size for this file ? --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 21:50, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
- What do you mean by "size" ? 88.160.88.144 10:11, 8 November 2023 (UTC)
- Presumably Sebring12Hrs is referring to the resolution. There's no EXIF data so we don't know what camera you used, but any modern digital camera produces photographs much larger than the 2.8 megapixels presented to us here. BigDom (talk) 09:38, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
- You are right ! Sebring12Hrs (talk) 20:01, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
- Presumably Sebring12Hrs is referring to the resolution. There's no EXIF data so we don't know what camera you used, but any modern digital camera produces photographs much larger than the 2.8 megapixels presented to us here. BigDom (talk) 09:38, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
- What do you mean by "size" ? 88.160.88.144 10:11, 8 November 2023 (UTC)
- Oppose Too small and leaning. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:30, 8 November 2023 (UTC)
- Oppose Yeah, per others. I expect more from FPs. Might be a VI, though. --Peulle (talk) 08:24, 8 November 2023 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 00:48, 13 November 2023 (UTC)
