Commons:Featured picture candidates/Log/April 2010

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 31 Mar 2010 at 15:09:04 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

A four segment panoramic image of Crib Goch facing east in Snowdonia National Park, Wales.
Confirmed results:
Result: 7 support, 6 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 16:44, 31 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 31 Mar 2010 at 14:37:44 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Photo of Trichoglossus haematodus moluccanus
Confirmed results:
Result: 2 support, 6 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 16:43, 31 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 4 Apr 2010 at 00:05:04 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gemsbok (Oryx gazella) in Etosha National Park, Namibia
Confirmed results:
Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Juliancolton | Talk 23:05, 31 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Mammals

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 31 Mar 2010 at 23:06:06 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

A 20-year-old cat
Confirmed results:
Result: 17 support, 8 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 08:00, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Mammals

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 5 Apr 2010 at 10:26:05 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

A cheetah (Acinonyx jubatus) in southern Namibia. It is urinating over a tree trunk.
  • Regarding as a noun it is female, i suppose. Otherwise i dont know if its female, but You can distinguish between female and male cat knowing male has bigger head and bigger foots. --Mile (talk) 19:04, 29 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 17:00, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Mammals

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 5 Apr 2010 at 19:08:23 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Chicago theater in downtown Chicago, USA
  •  Info Exposure blended shot of the Chicago theater. It's location in downtown Chicago is crammed and shadowing by surrounding highrises make for difficult lighting conditions. Perspective is partially corrected, full correction looks odd given the wide angle and upward pointing camera. A lot of postprocessing wen into this to remove any ghosting from the exposure blending. All by Dschwen (talk)
  •  Support -- Dschwen (talk) 19:08, 27 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Support  Comment Fine resolution. I think the partial perspective correction works well. Some movement shadows behind the person walking to the left, which you could easily remove. A little chromatic aberration. Snowmanradio (talk) 22:03, 27 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    • I have looked at in again and I have become a bit puzzled by the vanishing points. I think the perspective is flawed. I have changed my support vote to a comment. Awaiting amended image. Snowmanradio (talk) 20:00, 28 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Support A fine example of a well-done exposure blend. Looks natural and realistic enough. I noticed that the blonde person walking in front of the scaffolding on the right has a ghost of her hair a few feet behind her ; that should not be difficult to touch up either. --MAURILBERT (discuter) 03:22, 28 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Ok, thanks, I'll try fix those tomorrow. --Dschwen (talk) 04:06, 28 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Support Very nice. Steven Walling 09:00, 28 March 2010 (UTC) Switch to  Oppose, I didn't see the ghosting until I opened it at full resolution. If that's fixed I'd support again. Steven Walling 21:04, 28 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment - There is a significant difference between the angle of the buildings with the vertical at left (about 2.5º) and at right (about 5º). The result is an apparent cck tilt of the image. -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 10:25, 28 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment If the photo above photo is in your opinion "at least a QI", why should this one be FP? Yes, it's technically very good, and I like that it looks realistic althougt it is exposure blended. IMO the finest part of this photo are the lights of the theater, but it's otherwise quite dull. kallerna 11:15, 28 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    • Is would be also interesting to me... I ask me that too --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 15:01, 28 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
      • I don't think I quite understand the question here. Maybe you two need to refresh your knowledge of Predicate logic. As for Kallerna: I guess trying to explain why any picture that was neither taken by you nor shows a bird's behind should be FP seems like a waste of time :-P. --Dschwen (talk) 15:39, 28 March 2010 (UTC). P.S.: Just to make this even clearer: I was giving a lower bound for the other picture and you somehow seem to have confused this with an upper bound, which happens to be the exact opposite. --Dschwen (talk) 15:41, 28 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    • Although I also find this picture misses wow as well, I think it's fair to say that it is a little bit more challenging to take that the indian town hall below given the lighting conditions and the fact you have no choice but using very wide angle to catch the whole building (I'm just guessing, but wouldn't be surprised given the streets pattern of a typical american city downtown). - Benh (talk) 19:53, 28 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Oppose Similar pictures wouldnt pass QI because of perspective distortion. Ghosting seen. --Mile (talk) 19:18, 28 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Oppose lot of CA on borders and looks a bit "pale" because of the blending. I'd add a little bit more saturation to compensate. In my opinion, not enough wow to compensate for the minor technical faults overall, but I think I would support once they are fixed.. - Benh (talk) 19:53, 28 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Oppose no wow --LadyofHats (talk) 03:24, 29 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Oppose per Mile, sorry --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 08:33, 29 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  •  I withdraw my nomination. I was a bit sick the last two days and currently cannot find my original files for this image (shame on me). Plus I'm kind of busy preparing for a trip to SF. So I won't be able to work on this image in the next two weeks. --Dschwen (talk) 16:02, 31 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 6 Apr 2010 at 00:29:27 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Vauxhall Gardens
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 11:28, 2 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 2 Apr 2010 at 10:22:20 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Narcissus 'Pink Charm'
Confirmed results:
Result: 2 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 11:27, 2 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 2 Apr 2010 at 12:33:18 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
Confirmed results:
Result: 6 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 15:36, 2 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 6 Apr 2010 at 14:29:24 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Burg Špilberk
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 15:37, 2 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 7 Apr 2010 at 02:21:33 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

simple anatomical description of a mosquito (culex pipiens)
  •  Info created, uploaded and Nominated by LadyofHats -- LadyofHats (talk) 02:21, 29 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Support -- LadyofHats (talk) 02:21, 29 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Oppose Very nice, big fan of your work. However, a multilingual version should be nominated. ZooFari 02:25, 29 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Support Great picture. --The High Fin Sperm Whale 04:50, 29 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Support --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 10:10, 29 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Support Well done image --George Chernilevsky talk 10:46, 29 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Support Excellent work! Multilingual version is not a must for FP criteria. In this case I prefer the annotated version to the numbered version which is rather complicated to read due to the large number of annotations. -- Dr. Schorsch (talk) 10:49, 29 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Support Excellent, but it might be possible to improve it even further. Some minor points or observations suggested as constructive criticism mainly for overall consistency within the illustration: I wonder if it is worth writing "Cercus" on the right and putting a pointing line to it, and also to indicate what I to VII are perhaps by putting "Abdomen (segments I to VII)" on the right: The green at the top goes beyond the head and the blue of the abdomen stops at the end of the abdomen: I think that I would have put "Head", "Thorax", and "Abdomen" in the middle or the top of the coloured (or bracketed) bands: I might have extended the space available on the left and right for more room for the writing and added coloured (or bracketed) bands for the wing and leg (on the left): I am not sure why the existing coloured bands extend over the mid-line and why the middle band goes further to the left: The coloured band might not be needed if elongated brackets ("}"s) were used to indicate the head, thorax, and abdomen regions instead of colours. --Snowmanradio (talk) 11:54, 29 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    •  Info- i moved "cersus" and placed some text and line for the abdominal segments. i also increased the space on the bottom for the blue "bar". I can not give the wing a colored bar becouse wings are not perse segments of the body but instead belong to the Thorax. In a sence that is why the yellow bar extends a bit more than the other two. same goes for the legs. Colored bands may not be needed to divide the segments of the body but they look good :P. plus there is already a style line on insects diagrams that started with the ant i made some years ago. it would seem it has spreaded arround and i dont see any reason not to continue with it :) as examples for it are (the butterfly,heteroptera,grasshoper,housefly, between others ( none of this are mine)) -LadyofHats (talk) 16:08, 29 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
      •  Comment That seems to be an improvement to me, because of enhanced consistency. I did not know about the colour bands in the other images. I would not have realized that the extended middle band was indicating that the wings are part of the thorax. Snowmanradio (talk) 19:11, 29 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
      •  Comment Culex pipiens is the correct way of writing the binomial name of the species. The first word is capitalised and the second word is all lower case, and both words are in italics. The capitalization in the image will need correcting. Perhaps the binomial name could be written a bit larger, and perhaps in a more central position somewhere. Snowmanradio (talk) 19:26, 29 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
        •  Info i fixed the name, but i leave it in the same place since i have my doubths about having it on the picture at all. the idea was to make a diagram of a "generic" mosquito. unfortunaly i realised there are main diferences between the diferent species that go beyond of the color or size. specially between the anopheles and the culex. that is why i placed the name of my model to be on the safe side -LadyofHats (talk)
      •  Comment Foreleg is one word, while hind leg and mid leg are each two words, and they should probably be written "Hind leg" and "Mid leg" (the first word capitalised only - leg not capitalised as it is not a proper noun) to be in line with wiki capitalization guidelines. Snowmanradio (talk) 19:34, 29 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
        •  Info done it. i also changed colors to relate the wing and the legs to the thorax.-LadyofHats (talk)
      •  Question What would it look like with "Abdominal segments" on one line and with "(I to VII)" underneath on the line below? If the two mid legs were exchanged left to right, then there would be more room for the writing on the right. Snowmanradio (talk) 19:26, 29 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Support Excellent, but where are the multilanguague version? --Wilfredo Rodríguez (talk) 15:51, 29 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Support If you want multilanguage then translate it!. Demanding all translations to be done by the original author is unreasonable, especially if an SVG file is provided. --Dschwen (talk) 16:51, 30 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Culex pipiens diagram num.svg

It does not matter much, but it would be better to increase the default size of the SVG. /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 08:04, 31 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
but wikipedia already has a line in wich it offers you to see the image up to 2000 pixels wide. increasing the actual file size would only make it heavier for the server. oposite to a bitmap image it isnt like quality would improve with a bigger file -LadyofHats (talk) 08:34, 31 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The SVG code would not increase in length by changing the nominal size of the image; a larger default size would be a better match for the amount of detail shown; yes, the wikimedia software will create png files at any desired size, but it needs an extra click, and not everybody is aware of those 2000px links. /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 08:58, 31 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 15 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 20:23, 3 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Non-photographic media/Computer-generated
[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 3 Apr 2010 at 09:09:37 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Ikarus 280.33M bus in Moscow
Confirmed results:
Result: 3 support, 6 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 20:25, 3 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 3 Apr 2010 at 11:22:40 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Nouveau pane in house in Prague.
Confirmed results:
Result: 3 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 20:24, 3 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 7 Apr 2010 at 09:18:13 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Bitihorn (1.608 m) in Valdres (Oppland, Norway)
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 20:19, 3 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 9 Apr 2010 at 15:24:45 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Machu Picchu's sunset panorama.

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 2 Apr 2010 at 23:14:48 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

The A591 road as it passes through the countryside between Ambleside and Grasmere in the Lake District, England.
  •  Info created and uploaded by Diliff - nominated by The High Fin Sperm Whale -- The High Fin Sperm Whale 23:14, 24 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Support -- The High Fin Sperm Whale 23:14, 24 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Oversaturated to my eyes. --99of9 (talk) 02:40, 25 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Hm, shadows look lifted too much. Looks somewhat unnatural to me. --Dschwen (talk) 03:44, 25 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Oppose Overprocessed. kallerna 16:21, 25 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Opposeits not overprocessed, its a tonemapped image in my opinion. But i agree the saturation is too strong --Simonizer (talk) 17:01, 25 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Support A bit over saturated, but I still find this picture "attractive". Wonder what kind of processing was applied, certainly there was some sort of tone-mapping like treatment, or Diliff played a lot with curves, because shadow areas are noisy (not the typical canon 5D trademark...) and the sky dramatically blue (and I don't believe this comes from any kind of filters). - Benh (talk) 19:07, 25 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    • Yeah, it almost seems like the typical Diliff trademark. I have beeen browsing through a lot of his images lately and it seems that this is his standard processing. If I understood correctly he works exclusively from RAW, and my guess is that the shadow lifting (or rather digital "fill light" which is standard in raw converters) is part of his regular work flow. The noise in the shadows can be seen in many of his pictures. --Dschwen (talk) 19:24, 25 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
      • I don't know which software Diliff uses, but I've recently been experimenting as well to get this kind of "pop" skies. My only successful way is to tone map from a single picture : you underexpose and overexpose from RAW to get the additional exposures. You can them feed enblend with these pictures. In the end, u get better results (IMO) and more details than if u play with curves yourself as RAW have 12bit/channel on the 5D (against 8 for normal tiff or Jpeg I think, and anyways, I can't do this in gimp, yet ?). My results looks similar to this, with noise in dark areas, and intensely blue skies with white clouds. Maybe Photoshop and whatever from Adobe, DxO... offer more possibilities... but I believe it would be just mimicking this workflow. If anyone knows ? - Benh (talk) 19:52, 25 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
        • Yeah, this is one of the photos that I've never been 100% happy with, and was on the list of photos to reprocess. From memory I did exactly what Benh has described - except I used tufuse to blend the over and underexposed images, which isn't strictly tone mapping, but it's similar. The 'pop' of the sky is due to using a polariser filter, and it was undoubtably very green (late spring), but I think it's probably worth re-processing it and uploading a new image. Give me a bit of time. As an aside, sometimes the reason for the shadow noise in my images is not tone mapping or lifting the shadows too much. As you know, blown highlights are a pain, particularly in clouds in the sky, so I will often underexpose the photo in order to preserve those highlights. In order to then bring the rest of the image back to the correct exposure, you have to dig it out of the shadows, and that typically results in the noise. I think I've just overdone it on this image. Diliff (talk) 20:06, 25 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
          • Ok. This one is processed straight from Lightroom with no fusion involved. Fairly basic settings used actually. Virtually no saturation boost (+5 vibrance is all) so if you still think saturation is OTT, I politely disagree. As you can see, the left side wall is very underexposed, and the shadows are much deeper. Hope this is more to everyone's liking. Apologies for the first one being a bit crap. Dschwen, yeah, I do sometimes boost shadows (fill light) when the shadow detail is important, and as I said, I expose to minimise blown highlights, so sometimes this is necessary. Sometimes I get it wrong. Some photos require a revisit (or feedback) to notice the mistakes. :-) Diliff (talk) 20:50, 25 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
            • Yeah, I was not meaning to call this a mistake at all. I do the same thing with respect to under-exposure, and I like the results you get. I have been meaning to adjust my workflow to reproduce the lightend shadows, but often end up making my whole image dull. Guess global curves just doesn't cut it. I did experiment with enfusing multiple virtual exposure steps, but I guess I need more practice there. --Dschwen (talk) 21:36, 25 March 2010 (UTC) P.S.: Uhm, well for this picture did, just not the technique in general. --Dschwen (talk) 15:58, 26 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • I'm surprised you used a polariser filter as the effect seems even in the sky (one of the issues I often have is unevenness, which is even more pronounced when sun comes from aside, as this seems to be the case here), but this explains why the grass and trees are so green in my opinion. Any version looks good to me. I prefer bottom part from new version, but the sky from first one. - Benh (talk) 21:09, 25 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Question Diliff, is what you do simlar to tufuse's auto bracketing feature or is it better to do it manually? --Muhammad (talk) 10:36, 26 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Alternative

[edit]

Reprocessed.
Confirmed results:
Result: 11 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 09:16, 4 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 3 Apr 2010 at 21:59:02 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Ares I-X test rocket roars off
Confirmed results:
Result: 8 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 09:24, 4 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects/Vehicles

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on , featured3 Apr 2010 at 00:58:10 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

The main entranec of L'Oceanografic in Valencia, Spain as viewed from the side across the water.

Alternative

[edit]

Confirmed results:
Result: 8 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 09:20, 4 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 4 Apr 2010 at 02:55:01 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
Confirmed results:
Result: 2 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 09:12, 4 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 4 Apr 2010 at 17:00:46 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION

Alternative

[edit]

 Support Thanks for upping the alternative, Carschten. It indeed looks better, even though the original version doesn't show technical deficits but 'natural' ones. Greets, Horst-schlaemma (talk) 10:43, 27 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:
Result: 2 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 17:27, 4 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 8 Apr 2010 at 08:26:28 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Life cycle of the parasite Giardia
  •  Comment: Since the diagram is about infestation in humans, perhaps the image description should mention Giardia intestinalis. Is all of the information referenced? - I could not find "1 in 3 infected humans get symptoms" in the sources provided. Snowmanradio (talk) 10:18, 30 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

on the english wikipedia it is called Gardia lamblia so that is how i name it on the description. Also de the one on 3 was on the wikipedia article at the time i made the image. i tryed to find it right now but it seems to have been changed to "not all infections present symptoms". so i changed the image acording. I also uploaded a numbered version and found a german translation :P-LadyofHats (talk) 21:22, 30 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

i already removed that remark -LadyofHats (talk) 08:54, 31 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 17:27, 4 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 8 Apr 2010 at 23:07:51 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Photo of a Capybara, formatted (and sized) as a widescreen computer desktop background.
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 08:08, 5 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 5 Apr 2010 at 00:40:25 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

A view of a green Chicago River on March 14, 2009.
Confirmed results:
Result: 3 support, 9 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 08:05, 5 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 5 Apr 2010 at 05:36:06 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

advanced Chinese 17th century map
Confirmed results:
Result: 15 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 08:07, 5 April 2010 (UTC))[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Non-photographic media/Maps

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 5 Apr 2010 at 14:46:51 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

3d profile of star on 1-Euro-coin
  • Man nehme ein Messsystem mit einer hinreichend hohen optischen Auflösung und zahlreichen Pixeln. Dann muss man Matlab nur noch sagen, dass es die Grafik mit etwas mehr als 72 DPI ausgeben soll :-) -- Dr. Schorsch (talk) 21:31, 4 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 9 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 16:24, 5 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Non-photographic media/Computer-generated

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 9 Apr 2010 at 12:02:24 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

This is the smallest sort of canine in the world. I don't think any of its pictures are FP. This looked the best one of the right size. There was a straw in front of its face so I painted it out.
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 16:22, 5 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 5 Apr 2010 at 19:43:17 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • You know, it takes years of training and a tremendous amount of experience. And I am not sure I can teach you all that in just a simple response. But let me try anyways. Carefully look at the lower border of the image on the preview page. From there direct your critical eye downwards on the page, where it says other version... ;-P. --Dschwen (talk) 00:52, 29 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
 Info I added {{RetouchedPicture}}. Is it better now? Memorino (talk) 18:54, 29 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 2 support, 4 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 20:43, 5 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 5 Apr 2010 at 18:35:38 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
Confirmed results:
Result: 2 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 20:41, 5 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 10 Apr 2010 at 16:41:19 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Light play in Southern English Woodlan
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 04:41, 7 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 6 Apr 2010 at 23:34:57 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

A Ruddy Turnstone (Arenaria interpres) on a Florida beach in winter.
  • It is a shorebird and it is photographed on a sandy beach. I guess that the bird's colouring has an element of camouflage. I do not expect camouflaged animals to stand out against the background when they are photographed in the wild in a natural setting. The image size is 3,872 × 2,592, which is at least six times the area of a minimum sized FP. Snowmanradio (talk) 15:02, 29 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Oppose Sorry, just IMO boring composition. Good capture anyways. kallerna 18:54, 29 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Oppose QI definitely, but not really the "wow" needed for FP, especially relative to other avian photos. FWIW, I think the background/composition is just fine. The bird is in sharp enough focus to deal with a broken or shadowy background. Steven Walling 21:26, 29 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    •  Comment To clarify, I mean it has no special quality in terms of composition or how it illuminates the subject. I do not mean I simply find the subject boring (far from it). Put another way, it's not an exceptional educational photo, merely a technically adequate one, which is why I mentioned QI. Still, even if I did just think it was boring, the social sciences have clearly demonstrated that beautiful and engaging work helps people learn faster and more thoroughly than dry work. With that in mind, boring is a useful unit of measurement for educational photography. Steven Walling 04:45, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
      • This is a biological science image, and it is not especially a social sciences image. Snowmanradio (talk) 11:48, 1 April 2010 (UTC
  •  Support - Quite nicely done. "Wow" is a poor unit of measurement. –Juliancolton | Talk 03:19, 30 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment Anyone that is not interested in a subject would probably have a tendency not find images of that subject interesting. I am beginning to think that a plane-brown bird or animal would never get a FP. Snowmanradio (talk) 09:38, 30 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Neutral I absolutely agree with Snowmanradio and–Juliancolton | Talk comments about words "wow" and "boring", and with thought about plane-brown animals and getting FP (excerpt the bison above ) This is a great shot, with a good light. But maybe a little unsharp IMO.--Jebulon (talk) 23:33, 30 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Oppose It is definitely not bad, but the trampled sand is imo too distracting for it to be of featured quality. Njaelkies Lea (talk) 11:33, 2 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 4 support, 4 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 07:18, 7 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 11 Apr 2010 at 01:05:11 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 1 oppose, 2 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 07:20, 7 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 12 Apr 2010 at 20:01:30 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Photo of radio host, columnist, and entertainer Garrison Keillor.
Thank you for nominating this image. Unfortunately, it does not fall within the Guidelines and is unlikely to succeed for the following reason: it is cut off--Muhammad (talk) 09:52, 6 April 2010 (UTC)[reply] Anyone other than the nominator who disagrees may override this template by changing {{FPX}} to {{FPX contested}} and adding a vote in support. Voting will then continue in the usual way. If not contested within 24 hours, this nomination may be closed.

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 7 Apr 2010 at 10:18:02 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION

You want to know why?

I'll tell you why. Here's what the Arbcom on en-wiki has done in just the last month or so. You can figure out the context yourself.

1. Rlevse oversights links to the offline copy of the log about Durova, which was my main bit of evidence against Durova. This greatly escalates the case, forcing me to take it to Arbcom, because that's the only way I can have the log considered, since Rlevse is determined to abuse her tools to protect Duurova. OBVIOUS FAVOURITISM TO DUROVA

1a. I mail the Oversight committee about this. I get a message saing it was awaiting moderation, then nothing. I send it again, I'm told it's being discussed, but they forgot to tell me. I send two or three messages after this, asking if I'll be informed of the result. None are ever replied to.

2. During the case, Durova is allowed to go over the word limit, but if I do, I get a warning. I allow my text to be redacted once, because I was so upset over the Faysall's talking about how Durova should apologise, at which point I will immediately work with her on a project, treating two years of her using me as a scapegoat as something I should go back to, so the Arbcom doesn't have to bother. OBVIOUS FAVOURITISM TO DUROVA 2a. When I briefly go over again during the course of a major, three horu revision fo my statement, I get some weird edit conflicts along the way. I don't know why, so I just save over them, so I can get my thoughts together. IT turns out some clerk was constantly reverting to a reduced form of the FIRST EDIT I MADE, even as I was still trying to get my words together. In the meantime, Durova's wordcount stood at about 576, and no redaction happened to hers. OBVIOUS FAVOURITISM TO DUROVA 2b. I find out about this when done, and go to deal with it. I tell the clerk it will take a short time to work on it, and point out the problem with Durova. I complain about the uneven treatment, so he blocks me. OBVIOUS FAVOURITISM TO DUROVA 2c. The clerk then spends 2 hours being an utter dick, holding the block over my head, while poking me with a stick. He only unblocks if I promise to leave his highly misleading redaction alone. 2d. Durova's statement remained over the word count during this time. OBVIOUS FAVOURITISM TO DUROVA

3. Durova outright lies, claiming, based on me giving permission for her to post a specific log which backed an outrageous claim she made - and was never able to back - that she can post any logs she wants, because her Skype is saved as one log. She actually quotes from e-mails. The Arbcom are unconcerned with her behaviour, or that this new statement of hers is around 1500 words. OBVIOUS FAVOURITISM TO DUROVA

4. The fact that she lied about having permission, was unable to back an accusation which she had made on ANI before, claiming she had the log at that time, does not concern Arbcom. They decide that, despite me having been driven off Wikipedia for 5 months by her actions, and her not having a lick of evidence against me, that they should ignore her behaviour. OBVIOUS FAVOURITISM TO DUROVA?

5. Durova is allowed to make constant references to the situation which set off the case at en:Talk:The Raven, even make snide comments about logs containing my objection to her orientation. All this questioning was being done by other people. They are fine with this. But, when something I made on commons - which they explicitly excluded from their judgement - having seen what she was doing on en-wiki at en:Talk:The Raven gets put up as an FP candidate on en-wiki, and I politely ask that it not be used, because I had had to make do with some non-FP quality work, they block me for the maximum duration. OBVIOUS FAVOURITISM TO DUROVA


After Durova spent two years harassing me, they have decided to show blatant and obvious favouritism to her, while poking fun of me. And this while knowing I was in a vulnerable state for various reasons, had just returned after five months away due to the harassment, and had only in the last week returned to participation. Then they pull the last stunt, and taunt me about it.

English Wikipedia's power structure is blatantly corrupt. And anything I do here supports those people over there. That's why you should care about en-wiki. Adam Cuerden (talk) 03:31, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Uhm, first of all what you do here supports the readers of en.wp. Why punish them? Secondly why punish the remaining Wikimedia projects too? --Dschwen (talk) 03:46, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 3 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 16:45, 7 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 11 Apr 2010 at 12:11:54 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

A Hamerkop (Scopus umbretta) in the Serengeti, Tanzania
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 4 oppose, 3 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 16:47, 7 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 15 Apr 2010 at 03:37:57 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

A Water drop falling into a bowl of water.

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 16 Apr 2010 at 04:41:04 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Hungarian neuroscientist László Seress' 1980 preparation of the human hippocampus and fornix compared with a sea horse. (The hippocampus and fornix are neighbouring parts of the mammalian brain and "hippocampus" is Latin for "seahorse."


Thank you for nominating this image. Unfortunately, it does not fall within the Guidelines and is unlikely to succeed for the following reason: it is too small. If you have a larger image, please upload it. Thank you, --патриот8790 (talk) 06:55, 7 April 2010 (UTC)[reply] Anyone other than the nominator who disagrees may override this template by changing {{FPX}} to {{FPX contested}} and adding a vote in support. Voting will then continue in the usual way. If not contested within 24 hours, this nomination may be closed.

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 12 Apr 2010 at 14:30:26 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

en:Osmium crystals
Confirmed results:
Result: 13 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 15:09, 8 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 12 Apr 2010 at 13:47:48 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

a half Ruthenium bar
Confirmed results:
Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 15:10, 8 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 12 Apr 2010 at 12:09:40 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

"San Feng Zhong Jie" is a traditional dry market in Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 15:11, 8 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 12 Apr 2010 at 11:19:03 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

The "supreme seductress" of Hindu mythology - Mohini, the only female avatar of the male god Vishnu, depicted here with seduced sages, praying to her, details of wood carvings in a temple car belonging to the Ayodhyapattinam Sri Rama temple.
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 15:12, 8 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 9 Apr 2010 at 06:48:01 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

American Bird Grasshopper
Confirmed results:
Result: 15 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 10:21, 9 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Arthropods

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 8 Apr 2010 at 21:10:03 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Scarlet Macaw in Yucatan, Mexico.

Alternative

[edit]

Confirmed results:
Result: 2 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 04:40, 9 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 8 Apr 2010 at 15:30:15 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Bison bonasus
Confirmed results:
Result: 12 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 04:42, 9 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Mammals

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 9 Apr 2010 at 00:15:07 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Dominostein
Confirmed results:
Result: 10 support, 5 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 04:47, 9 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 5 Apr 2010 at 13:44:42 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
Confirmed results:
Result: 6 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 16:27, 5 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Arthropods

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 9 Apr 2010 at 08:46:26 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

The Sella and Saslong group in the Dolomites
Confirmed results:
Result: 4 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 10:29, 9 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 11 Apr 2010 at 21:19:08 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

HST Orion nebula image composited with a Spitzer image for something a little different.
Confirmed results:
Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 19:29, 9 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Astronomy

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 13 Apr 2010 at 13:07:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

The lighthouse du Portzic in Brest (bretagne, FR)
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 19:30, 9 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 9 Apr 2010 at 21:10:53 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Oak. The picture shows the tree before the start of the growing season. It is a twelve segment panoramic image.
Confirmed results:
Result: 2 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 06:19, 10 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 13 Apr 2010 at 20:09:50 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Mating Osmia cornuta
  •  Info Ant watching a mating pair of Osmia cornuta bees (after a second it got bored ...)

created by --Pjt56 (talk) 20:09, 4 April 2010 (UTC) - uploaded by --Pjt56 (talk) 20:09, 4 April 2010 (UTC) - nominated by -- Pjt56 (talk) 20:09, 4 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:
Result: 15 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /99of9 (talk) 03:29, 10 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Arthropods

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 10 Apr 2010 at 05:32:57 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

The Abbey church at New Norcia

alt version, meta inc perspective adjusted

Confirmed results:
Result: 12 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 14:24, 10 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture
The chosen alternative is: File:New_norcia_gnangarra_1_v2.jpg

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 14 Apr 2010 at 12:03:23 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

File:2h Namur 13.jpg
Confirmed results:
Result: 18 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 19:11, 10 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Interiors

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 10 Apr 2010 at 16:18:38 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Coat of arms of the dukes of Atholl, at Blair Castle, Scotland.
I agree that the crop looks a bit odd. I couldn't make it tighter because of the head of the top character, and I couldn't make it wider because of the top of a gate right below current crop (I would have been too prominent with a wider crop). --Eusebius (talk) 19:22, 2 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 5 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 19:14, 10 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 14 Apr 2010 at 21:27:36 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Iceland poppy flower center
Confirmed results:
Result: 11 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 06:09, 11 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Plants/Flowers

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 11 Apr 2010 at 20:07:57 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
Confirmed results:
Result: 3 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 20:14, 11 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 11 Apr 2010 at 08:10:09 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Pterois volitans
Confirmed results:
Result: 9 support, 6 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 16:07, 11 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 11 Apr 2010 at 19:26:24 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Skyscrapers of Shinjuku and Mount Fuji, view from Bunkyo Civic Center, the city hall of Bunkyo-ku.
  • The sky must be rather clear to see Fuji from 100km distance. What you describe as motion blur/hazy is probably the effect of being taken through a not so perfect glass. --Elekhh (talk) 08:41, 3 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 2 support, 3 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 20:13, 11 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 12 Apr 2010 at 00:23:34 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

The Garden of Earthly Delights
  • Especially the right part seems a little dark, but the problem is: How do you want to decide how much tweaking is needed? Scans on the net vary from all ranges of color and quality, and even prints aren´t always reliable. The correction would have to be made by someone with some good artbooks to compare. Nikopol (talk) 10:26, 5 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Support Some reflections of the (flash)lamps at the upper side, but otherwise stunning quality. As far as I can remember from viewing the original painting at the Prado, the right panel is really that dark. So please don't correct brightness or contrast... -- MJJR (talk) 20:15, 5 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    • Changes would affect the left two panels FAR more than the right. 03:13, 6 April 2010 (UTC)
  • I would support this, but I prefer the alternative version. --Avenue (talk) 13:15, 7 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The Garden of Earthly Delights
Confirmed results:
Result: 9 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 05:01, 12 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Non-photographic media

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 18 Apr 2010 at 13:44:46 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
Thank you for nominating this image. Unfortunately, it does not fall within the Guidelines and is unlikely to succeed for the following reason: the image is too small--патриот8790 (talk) 06:42, 11 April 2010 (UTC)[reply] Anyone other than the nominator who disagrees may override this template by changing {{FPX}} to {{FPX contested}} and adding a vote in support. Voting will then continue in the usual way. If not contested within 24 hours, this nomination may be closed.

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 12 Apr 2010 at 13:42:27 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

the larva state of a mosquito (Culex restuans)
Confirmed results:
Result: 5 support, 0 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 14:45, 12 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Non-photographic media/Computer-generated

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 12 Apr 2010 at 11:45:29 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
Confirmed results:
Result: 3 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 12:54, 12 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 16 Apr 2010 at 13:56:13 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 19:10, 12 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 20 Apr 2010 at 03:18:25 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Night view of the Bank of America Tower in Charlotte, NC.
Thank you for nominating this image. Unfortunately, it does not fall within the Guidelines and is unlikely to succeed for the following reason: reasons given by commenters above. --99of9 (talk) 04:08, 12 April 2010 (UTC)[reply] Anyone other than the nominator who disagrees may override this template by changing {{FPX}} to {{FPX contested}} and adding a vote in support. Voting will then continue in the usual way. If not contested within 24 hours, this nomination may be closed.

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 21 Apr 2010 at 02:54:49 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

A en:European Eagle Owl taken at the market square in en:Stafford in front of the Guildhall Shopping Center
Thank you for nominating this image. Unfortunately, it does not fall within the Guidelines and is unlikely to succeed for the following reason: it does not meet the 2Mpx size requirement. --99of9 (talk) 04:16, 12 April 2010 (UTC)[reply] Anyone other than the nominator who disagrees may override this template by changing {{FPX}} to {{FPX contested}} and adding a vote in support. Voting will then continue in the usual way. If not contested within 24 hours, this nomination may be closed.

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 21 Apr 2010 at 03:50:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

A en:little owl with it's head facing the back
Thank you for nominating this image. Unfortunately, it does not fall within the Guidelines and is unlikely to succeed for the following reason: it has a very busy, distracting background --99of9 (talk) 04:05, 12 April 2010 (UTC)[reply] Anyone other than the nominator who disagrees may override this template by changing {{FPX}} to {{FPX contested}} and adding a vote in support. Voting will then continue in the usual way. If not contested within 24 hours, this nomination may be closed.

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 13 Apr 2010 at 11:49:20 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Fontaine au Lion, Grenoble.
Confirmed results:
Result: 5 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 13:06, 13 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 13 Apr 2010 at 11:59:37 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

La deposizione nel Sepolcro (Deposition in the Sepulchre), Antonio Brilla 1866
La deposizione nel Sepolcro (Deposition in the Sepulchre), Antonio Brilla 1866
Confirmed results:
Result: 2 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 13:08, 13 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 21 Apr 2010 at 04:04:22 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
Thank you for nominating this image. Unfortunately, it does not fall within the Guidelines and is unlikely to succeed for the following reason: the image is out of focus -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 08:04, 12 April 2010 (UTC)[reply] Anyone other than the nominator who disagrees may override this template by changing {{FPX}} to {{FPX contested}} and adding a vote in support. Voting will then continue in the usual way. If not contested within 24 hours, this nomination may be closed.

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 13 Apr 2010 at 23:17:36 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Batafite octahedron crystal
Confirmed results:
Result: 3 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 04:55, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 13 Apr 2010 at 23:15:34 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Cassiterite, rare big crystals
Confirmed results:
Result: 7 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 04:57, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 13 Apr 2010 at 20:26:47 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

An arab capital with the nasrid motto in Alhambra, Granada, Spain
Confirmed results:
Result: 3 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 04:51, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 13 Apr 2010 at 15:10:09 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

World War I cemetery nr 225 - Brzostek, Poland. Head of Jesus
Confirmed results:
Result: 3 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 16:02, 13 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 16 Jun 2010 at 18:40:45 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Vauxhall Gardens
You are right. I've actually been meaning to move it for some time, but it's used enough places that it's going to be slightly disruptive. Long story short, that was the filename on my computer; the 03193u is the Library of Congress file name, which makes it a little easier for me to find the right page again when it comes time to link the image. Unfortunately, when I sent my work to Durova, she uploaded without changing the name, and there was no easy way to move files until fairly recently. It's moved now. Adam Cuerden (talk) 22:31, 15 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for your effort to change for a better name. I still disagree with your keeping of "Dr. Johnson, Oliver Goldsmith, Mary Robinson, et al." within the file name. I think File names should not be more complicated than "<artist name> - <artwork title>". For example, I find the dates too noisy in File:Leonardo da Vinci (1452-1519) - The Last Supper (1495-1498).jpg but I am glad that it is not named [[:File:Leonardo da Vinci - The Last Supper - Jesus, Peter, John et al.jpg]]. Anyway your effort is probably worth that I change my "oppose" into "neutral". Teofilo (talk) 08:20, 16 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 8 support, 1 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 21:58, 16 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Historical

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 21 Apr 2010 at 04:24:33 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

A close up of an Petunia cultivar at the Stafford roundabout.
What do you mean by "special"? --Tyw7  (Talk • Contributions)   Changing the world one edit at a time! 04:38, 12 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for nominating this image. Unfortunately, it does not fall within the Guidelines and is unlikely to succeed for the following reason: of very poor image quality and composition -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 08:03, 12 April 2010 (UTC)[reply] Anyone other than the nominator who disagrees may override this template by changing {{FPX}} to {{FPX contested}} and adding a vote in support. Voting will then continue in the usual way. If not contested within 24 hours, this nomination may be closed.

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 13 Apr 2010 at 12:19:56


Confirmed results:
Result: 7 delist, 0 keep, 0 neutral => delisted. /FPCBot (talk) 15:01, 13 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 17 Apr 2010 at 23:29:57 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

The Dago waterfall near Bandung, showing Crepuscular rays (1920 - 1932)
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 15:46, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 17 Apr 2010 at 15:05:21 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Inside the Bourlémont fortifications.
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 15:48, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 17 Apr 2010 at 19:01:00 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

The Jellyfish, Aurelia aurita, in the aquariun Oceanopolis in Brest (FR)
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 15:47, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 13 Apr 2010 at 19:53:54 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
Confirmed results:
Result: 10 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 15:53, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Plants/Flowers

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 14 Apr 2010 at 14:04:30 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

The w:Chakras as in the Human body per Hindu w:Yoga
Confirmed results:
Result: 3 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 15:49, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 18 Apr 2010 at 21:45:24 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Aesculapian Snake (Zamenis longissimus) in the wild
Could you please add geolocation?--Mbz1 (talk) 21:53, 9 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
No sorry, due to it's status as endangered species. But I refined the description. – Felix Reimann (talk) 22:23, 9 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Not true, it is least concern. Noodle snacks (talk) 01:54, 10 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Could be protected locally. Njaelkies Lea (talk) 05:58, 11 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
You're both right: Endangered according the Red List of Switzerland, least concern according to IUCN. For me, it's still enough to omit the exact geolocation in this case. – Felix Reimann (talk) 07:29, 12 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 17 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 06:26, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Reptiles

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 15 Apr 2010 at 12:56:10 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
Confirmed results:
Result: 8 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /99of9 (talk) 06:25, 16 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Plants/Flowers

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 17 Apr 2010 at 16:25:33 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION

Fin Sperm Whale 18:17, 8 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Well, at first I was upset, when the girl run into my image, and re-shot it, when she left. So, I even do not have to crop the child, I could upload the same panorama without the girl, and without any scale of the rock. That's why I will not. That rock could be appreciated much more, if there is a scale. Thanks.--Mbz1 (talk) 18:51, 8 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I do not know the girl. It was an accident she got into the shot. I could not ask her to pose for me, but no worries. I respect your opinion, and thank you for voting and commenting on the image.--Mbz1 (talk) 19:09, 8 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
snapshot-like posture???--Mbz1 (talk) 18:51, 8 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry if I'm rude, and maybe my English is not good enough: it looks exactly like she just ran into the shot. Good as a scale, but IMO not good enough for FP. --Pjt56 (talk) 19:46, 8 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 20:48, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 16 Apr 2010 at 11:51:25 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

a crash landing on the aircraft carrier USS Enterprise (1943)
Confirmed results:
Result: 12 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 17:45, 16 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Historical

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 16 Apr 2010 at 17:21:59 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Grand Coat of Arms of Grand Duchy of Poznań
Confirmed results:
Result: 8 support, 0 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 17:51, 16 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Non-photographic media/Computer-generated

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 16 Apr 2010 at 16:29:59 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Petit Piton, St. Lucia
Confirmed results:
Result: 6 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 17:48, 16 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 19 Apr 2010 at 21:00:22 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 17:46, 16 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 16 Apr 2010 at 17:34:52 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
Confirmed results:
Result: 8 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 17:54, 16 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Arthropods

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 15 Apr 2010 at 13:18:43



Confirmed results:
Result: 6 delist, 0 keep, 0 neutral => delisted. /FPCBot (talk) 15:01, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 19 Apr 2010 at 19:41:03 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

A Campanula after a small rain

* Oppose Please fix dust spots first. --ianaré (talk) 23:04, 10 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:
Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 15:08, 17 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Plants/Flowers

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 17 Apr 2010 at 15:01:28 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Myotis myotis
Confirmed results:
Result: 2 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 15:13, 17 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 17 Apr 2010 at 15:11:28 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Inside the bourlémont fortifications.
Confirmed results:
Result: 9 support, 3 oppose, 2 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 15:18, 17 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Interiors

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 17 Apr 2010 at 15:03:13 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Underground of the Roppe fortifications.
Confirmed results:
Result: 2 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 15:14, 17 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 17 Apr 2010 at 15:06:30 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Iced Dew droplet
Confirmed results:
Result: 3 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 15:15, 17 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 17 Apr 2010 at 19:51:19 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Bald eagle (Haliaeetus leucocephalus) on a bird show on the castle Augustusburg, Germany
Update: Since the color has been improved; I change my vote.
 Support Crapload (talk) 20:33, 16 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 10 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 21:15, 17 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Birds

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 17 Apr 2010 at 19:54:50 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
Confirmed results:
Result: 2 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 21:11, 17 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 21 Apr 2010 at 02:56:29 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

A red flower taken at en:Stafford. These flowers appears to be a modern garden en:primula en:cultivar.
What do you want? Me to upweed the plant and place it on white paper? --Tyw7  (Talk • Contributions)   Changing the world one edit at a time! 04:23, 12 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I'm sorry Tyw7, but there's more to good photography than just pointing your camera at a plant (or an owl) and pressing the shutter button. --Aqwis (talk) 05:31, 12 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Or you could have put the camera at a lower angle so that you would have a more interesting background than just dirt. --The High Fin Sperm Whale 17:32, 12 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 15:06, 17 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 21 Apr 2010 at 19:24:48 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Cheshire Forest Mural
Thank you for nominating this image. Unfortunately, it does not fall within the Guidelines and is unlikely to succeed for the following reason: of quality issues, especially poor lighting and artifacts -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 14:58, 17 April 2010 (UTC)[reply] Anyone other than the nominator who disagrees may override this template by changing {{FPX}} to {{FPX contested}} and adding a vote in support. Voting will then continue in the usual way. If not contested within 24 hours, this nomination may be closed.

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 18 Apr 2010 at 15:26:35 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
Confirmed results:
Result: 11 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /99of9 (talk) 03:17, 19 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Plants/Flowers

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 18 Apr 2010 at 18:51:55 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Point Lobos
I believe I did. Have you checked it?--Mbz1 (talk) 19:24, 9 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Well, it very curved right now... -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 19:55, 9 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Another try is in. If it still not straight, it is just an optical illusion :) Seriously, if it still not straight, please fix it, somebody --Mbz1 (talk) 20:21, 9 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
If it's a stitch, I'd be happy to help if u trust me enough to send me original pictures. - Benh (talk) 18:07, 12 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Well, the Earth is curved... –Juliancolton | Talk 15:11, 11 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Nothing special??? How many landscape shots one could call "sexy" . On a more serious note. I do not think it is still curved. I checked it. IMO it looks fine. What you see as a curved horizon is just an optical illusion --Mbz1 (talk) 18:48, 12 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
OK, "Nothing special" is rather a subjective thing... and for this reason we could debate endlessly. I believe anyone could take this (including myself, I've taken some, and even upload a few to wiki, albeit maybe not as impressive), and u've proven you could take shots not so many of us here could. As for the horizon, I can even see this on thumbnail. I've moved the horizon against the bottom border of my monitor: either my monitor or the horizon is curved. In case it's the horizon, you can fix it. I also repeat my proposition to help. If it's my monitor, I'll try to see if my warranty covers this, or have a look at the specs again (was it actually flat screen ?) - Benh (talk) 21:44, 12 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Of course, Benh, if you'd like to work with the image, please do. Thank you.--Mbz1 (talk) 23:52, 12 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I was more thinking about restitching it ;-), but up to you - Benh (talk) 05:15, 13 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, it's curved — I just checked in GIMP, and the left and right ends of the horizon are both about 12 pixels lower than the midpoint. Compared to all the other work that must've gone into creating this, restitching with a couple of horizontal rules shouldn't be too hard (although I can understand your reluctance to do it if you've done a lot of postprocessing after stitching). —Ilmari Karonen (talk) 11:46, 13 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 8 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 04:13, 19 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 17 Apr 2010 at 11:02:37 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
Confirmed results:
Result: 9 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /99of9 (talk) 03:18, 19 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Plants/Flowers

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 18 Apr 2010 at 15:37:04 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Waiting for business...
Confirmed results:
Result: 12 support, 8 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 04:12, 19 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 18 Apr 2010 at 16:23:15 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Schloss Lichtenstein in Baden-Württemberg
Confirmed results:
Result: 15 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 05:54, 19 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 19 Apr 2010 at 11:08:16 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Spitzer's Orion
Confirmed results:
Result: 9 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 13:50, 19 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Astronomy

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 26 Apr 2010 at 12:23:19 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Panorama à partir de l'arc de Triomphe Paris
Thank you for nominating this image. Unfortunately, it does not fall within the Guidelines and is unlikely to succeed for the following reason: of very poor technical quality: lighting, sharpness, geometry, stitching -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 20:07, 17 April 2010 (UTC)[reply] Anyone other than the nominator who disagrees may override this template by changing {{FPX}} to {{FPX contested}} and adding a vote in support. Voting will then continue in the usual way. If not contested within 24 hours, this nomination may be closed.

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 25 Apr 2010 at 22:54:02 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  •  Info created, uploaded, nominated by -- Tomascastelazo (talk) 22:54, 16 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Support -- Tomascastelazo (talk) 22:54, 16 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Support --The High Fin Sperm Whale 23:42, 16 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Support --Schnobby (talk) 06:22, 17 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Oppose 25% from the image are to dark, bad crop, I'm missing the sky. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 08:03, 17 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Oppose -- Nothing in the image is sharp (lack of focus or motion blur ?)-- Alvesgaspar (talk) 10:31, 17 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Support --патриот8790 (talk) 14:41, 17 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Oppose. The Grand Canyon is impressive, this picture isn't. It surprises me that it is getting any support at all. The crop is arbitraryrandom and the technical quality is just bad. Why was this even nominated?! --Dschwen (talk) 15:10, 17 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    •  Comment Dschewn: Agree on technical quality, but not on crop... How can you crop the GC? All crops are arbitrary. --Tomascastelazo (talk) 16:14, 17 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
      • Absolutely not. Yes, you have to crop, but that does not mean all crops are arbitraryrandom. The composition is what separates a good shot from a bad shot (provided that the technical quality is there). Saying all crops are arbitraryrandom is like saying you should not look through the viewfinder anymore (or screen on cheapo cameras ;-) ).--Dschwen (talk) 18:53, 17 April 2010 (UTC) PS.: this nomination also provides more clues as to who seems to be judging thumbnails only... :-( --Dschwen (talk) 18:55, 17 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
        • This is really a rethorical argument. All crops, conscious or not, are arbitrary, they depend on the criteria of the photographer (well, maybe ;o)). I will admit to the quality issues on this pic, but not on the crop. You may not like the crop, that is up to you, and I am ok with that. My compositional desicion may not work on you, but that does not mean it is bad in a universal sense. That does not mean however, that all my composition is good. It is all relative my friends... and you know it. --Tomascastelazo (talk) 19:14, 17 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
          • Ha! Actually this is not at all a rhetorical argument, but you are right to contest my original assertion that the crop is arbitraryrandom. That is just how it looked to me. If you tell me you thought about the composition and made a conscious choice than I guess it isn't arbitraryrandom (but still doesn't work for me). Again, the arguments that follow are not rhetoric at all. I firmly believe that a compositional decision by a good photographer should be distinguishable form randomly pointing the camera (or if you like: giving a camera to a monkey. Then again, if you give a million cameras to a million monkeys... => Ansel Adams ;-) ). --Dschwen (talk) 19:28, 17 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
            • Well, of course that a conscious decision on crop has a better chance of becoming an acceptable picture under universally agreed on photographic principles, it is still an arbitrary decision (definition by webster: 1 : depending on individual discretion (as of a judge) and not fixed by law <the manner of punishment is arbitrary>). Perhaps you are referring to random composition, which is different, or monkey photography (definition by webster: a haphazard course— at random : without definite aim, direction, rule, or method <subjects chosen at random>). So if this is not a rethorical argument, then it is definitely a semantic one. Now, I invite you to really take a photographic look at the composition, and look for the intention of the composition. Evidently on the first pass it did not work for you and that could either be because a) my technique is flawed or b) you are not an observer. c) both. Think photographically. --Tomascastelazo (talk) 19:48, 17 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
              • Oh noes! Beaten by Webster. Yes, I was thinking of random rather than arbitrary. As for you little multiple choice quiz: I'm fairly sure that answer a) is correct. Even if it sounds arrogant: I'll just point to my photographic track-record to save myself some annoying justifications. --Dschwen (talk) 21:12, 17 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
                • LOL! Well, a mexican standoff... answer for me is b, and I also point out to my photographic track-record... whose´s is bigger??? I´ll show you mine if you show me yours! At least you have put the finger on the issue that I have always pointed out: the decision to support/oppose resides on a subjective criteria, the mention of your track record is just that, and your track record has to be validated by qualified outsiders. And the problem still remains: The quality of the votes is dependent on the quality of the knowledge of the voters, and the result is that a lot of quality pictures are set aside, bad picters are given a pass, and a lot of qualified photographers get discouraged in this process. I have to admit, however, that things are not as bad as in times past. --Tomascastelazo (talk) 21:52, 17 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
                  • Well, I don't even know what you mean with your option b). How can I not be an observer? Are you accusing me of not looking carefully enough at your image, or of being incompetent of judging it properly? In any case I would have preferred an option d) my composition simply does not look appealing to you, which would have made this conversation a bit less confrontational... --Dschwen (talk) 01:33, 18 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
                    • Easy man... I didn´t think this conversation confrontational, but rethorical. By your own logic then I have to interpret your choosing option "a" as my technique flawed, and therefore stand accused of being a technically deficient photographer, and your judgement right, but you won´t accept the possibility of my technique correct and your observation flawed? Not fair, since this is really an argument over opinion, and yes, option "d" would have been desired. --Tomascastelazo (talk) 04:03, 18 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Oppose, bad technical quality. --Aqwis (talk) 16:02, 17 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  •  I withdraw my nomination Duh!!! I uploaded wrong pic. --Tomascastelazo (talk) 16:11, 17 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 23 Apr 2010 at 16:28:18 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Mandibule.jpg

American Alligator (Alligator mississippiensis) Skull and mandible (47cm)


Confirmed results:
Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 05:42, 20 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Reptiles

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 20 Apr 2010 at 02:30:48 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Orange Armenian Poppy
Confirmed results:
Result: 4 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 05:36, 20 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 20 Apr 2010 at 01:42:24 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

ISAF soldier looking for enemies
Confirmed results:
Result: 3 support, 6 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 05:35, 20 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 19 Apr 2010 at 21:36:16 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Wood Frogs

Alternative

[edit]

Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Wood Frogs

 Support -- I agree with Steven, I think this is better. -- Cephas (talk) 23:15, 13 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:
Result: 7 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 05:31, 20 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Amphibians
The chosen alternative is: File:Rana_sylvatica_SC_2.jpg

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 20 Apr 2010 at 05:01:57 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

The Sombrero Galaxy in infrared light
Confirmed results:
Result: 5 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 05:38, 20 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 20 Apr 2010 at 00:42:45 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Valluvar Kottam at Chennai, India is a chariot shaped memorial dedicated to the Tamil poet Tiruvalluvar.
Confirmed results:
Result: 5 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 05:33, 20 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 20 Apr 2010 at 12:52:57 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Australian darter (Anhinga novaehollandiae)
Confirmed results:
Result: 6 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 14:30, 20 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 20 Apr 2010 at 13:34:12 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

California ground squirrel
I confused Mpix and MB, but I think my point still stands. Crapload (talk) 21:32, 13 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 10 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 14:32, 20 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Mammals

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 20 Apr 2010 at 06:52:28 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

The Ripon Building, the headquarters of Chennai Corporation in Chennai, India.
Confirmed results:
Result: 5 support, 1 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 14:27, 20 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 20 Apr 2010 at 06:44:38 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Windmill near Kottmarsdorf, Germany named Burkmühle Kottmarsdorf
Confirmed results:
Result: 3 support, 1 oppose, 2 neutral → not featured. /99of9 (talk) 07:25, 20 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 24 Apr 2010 at 13:49:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

La Désirade seen from Guadeloupe.
Confirmed results:
Result: 2 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--Cayambe (talk) 12:29, 21 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 20 Apr 2010 at 17:02:20 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Hyacinth Macaw (Anodorhynchus hyacinthinus) showing side of head and neck.
Confirmed results:
Result: 8 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 17:39, 21 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Birds

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 21 Apr 2010 at 17:19:25 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Sea grape tree in yello
Confirmed results:
Result: 2 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 17:52, 21 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 20 Apr 2010 at 22:54:09 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
Confirmed results:
Result: 9 support, 7 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 17:42, 21 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 21 Apr 2010 at 15:30:54 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

250mp panorama of San Francisco.
  •  Comment I don't either, and have voted down panoramas before. But I think in this case the level of technical expertise and simply awe inspiring detail are strong mitigating factors for what are issues largely beyond the photographer's control. --ianaré (talk) 14:55, 13 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 4 support, 6 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 17:49, 21 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 21 Apr 2010 at 21:10:12 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Pont Saint-Bénezet at dusk, France.
Confirmed results:
Result: 2 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 10:57, 22 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 25 Apr 2010 at 20:05:39 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Overview of the 2nd fissure on Fimmvörðuháls, close to Eyjafjallajökull, as the lava flows down towards the north, turning snow into steam. A simply stunning combination of ice and fire in intense glowing pink, and a major current news item.
Confirmed results:
Result: 17 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 11:01, 22 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Natural phenomena
[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 22 Apr 2010 at 01:53:42 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Large crystals of Kyanite

 Oppose bad light, and partially unsharp.--Jebulon (talk) 22:36, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Alternative

[edit]

Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Edited version
  •  Comment HFSW, the problem with the lighting is that it is harsh and face on. This type of harsh front lighting flattens the subject. In contrast, softer, side lighting, gives the subject volume, texture and can differenciate the tonal range of the colors of the subject. When using side ligthing, one has to consider the ratio of illumination between the main source and the fill source, keeping it at about 3:1 ratio in order to take advantage of both, the tonal range of the subject and the dynamic range of the image. This of course is considering a "normal" subject, with tonal values in the middle range. With subjects with tonal values in the upper or lowes side of the luminosoty scale one has to adjust accordingly. Read a little about lighting and lighting situations and a briefer on zone system photography. There is plenty of material on the web. --Tomascastelazo (talk) 18:48, 17 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 2 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 10:59, 22 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 22 Apr 2010 at 14:22:48 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION

 Support A little grain (noise) is natural. --Lawboy25 (talk) 22:09, 18 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:
Result: 3 support, 5 oppose, 2 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 15:16, 22 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 26 Apr 2010 at 12:51:47 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Junger Siamkater
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 15:18, 22 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 26 Apr 2010 at 13:05:24 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Murotsu Port in Murotsu, Tatsuno, Hyogo prefecture, Japan
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 1 oppose, 2 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 15:21, 22 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 22 Apr 2010 at 13:52:29 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Pyongyang in the morning fog, DPR Korea (North Korea).
Confirmed results:
Result: 3 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 15:15, 22 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 26 Apr 2010 at 12:27:08 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Bourg in Tatsuno Castle in Tatsuno, Hyogo prefecture, Japan
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 1 oppose, 2 neutral → not featured. /Juliancolton | Talk 17:51, 22 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 26 Apr 2010 at 16:29:00 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Pier by Wall Street
  •  Info created by NYCRuss - uploaded by NYCRuss - nominated by NYCRuss -- NYCRuss (talk) 16:29, 17 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Support -- NYCRuss (talk) 16:29, 17 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Oppose Bad composition. --The High Fin Sperm Whale 17:08, 17 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Neutral Actually, the composition is what I like about this one, unbalanced as it is (although, if we start picking nits, a slight crop on the bottom and right sides might make it even better). But still... no. It's not quite as sharp as I'd expect an FP to be, and, even though the file name suggests the subject to be the taxi, you can't actually see anything of the taxi itself except that it's yellow. I do realize that moving the camera 15–25 meters back, so that the entire taxi could be seen, would inevitably also place it outside said taxi and over the river. Still, such a picture could be taken, from another vessel, and IMO that's the kind of thing would move this from "nice, but not quite FP" to "wow, support!" for me. —Ilmari Karonen (talk) 16:52, 18 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Oppose, on the grounds that a picture that says it's supposed to depict a water taxi should actually show one as the main part of the image, not a wedge on the side. Daniel Case (talk) 04:40, 21 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 2 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 04:44, 23 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 23 Apr 2010 at 09:13:11 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

A simplified diagram of the circulatory sistem.
Confirmed results:
Result: 7 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 11:12, 23 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Non-photographic media/Computer-generated

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 23 Apr 2010 at 12:15:28 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Cetonia aurata (rose chafer)
To argue with dead against a FP is just as bad as it would be to argue that GFDL 1.2 only images are not valid for FP. Amada44 (talk) 18:53, 17 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The license of the image does not affect the content of the picture but the bug being dead here affects the composition -Muhammad (talk) 16:59, 19 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
But the license effects the usability of images... If you are unhappy with the composition you might as well have said that. because "dead" does not automatically imply bad composition or what ever else you don't like of that image. Amada44 (talk) 06:41, 20 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 6 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 13:01, 23 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Arthropods

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 23 Apr 2010 at 00:02:12 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
Confirmed results:
Result: 5 support, 8 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--Cayambe (talk) 10:25, 23 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 23 Apr 2010 at 12:25:34 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Flats in Opole (Oppeln) on the Młynówka (Mühlgraben; old channel of Odra river)
Confirmed results:
Result: 2 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 13:03, 23 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 27 Apr 2010 at 00:28:32 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

an etched Vanadium disc
Confirmed results:
Result: 11 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 11:08, 23 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 23 Apr 2010 at 13:22:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
Confirmed results:
Result: 11 support, 5 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 15:11, 23 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 23 Apr 2010 at 20:23:34 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
Confirmed results:
Result: 4 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 06:58, 24 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 23 Apr 2010 at 17:13:42 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

A grove snail from my lawn. I think he is scared of the storks. They have nest not very far from his feeding ground.
Confirmed results:
Result: 10 support, 6 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 06:57, 24 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 23 Apr 2010 at 16:27:10 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Quartz - Minas Gerais - Brasil (18x15cm)
Confirmed results:
Result: 6 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 06:42, 24 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 27 Apr 2010 at 19:43:19 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Harbour in Karlstad
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /FPCBot (talk) 23:03, 23 April 2010 (UTC) Oppose count corrected. ~Kevin Payravi (Talk) 02:59, 24 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 24 Apr 2010 at 13:13:08 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Apricot Floewrs at the Rain in Dusheti (georgia)
Confirmed results:
Result: 2 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 14:16, 24 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 24 Apr 2010 at 08:41:10 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
Confirmed results:
Result: 4 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 14:12, 24 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 24 Apr 2010 at 07:58:24 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Confirmed results:
Result: 3 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 14:14, 24 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 24 Apr 2010 at 11:15:52 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

a diagram of a grape i made for "the Philip Greenspun illustration project".shows the main parts as well as the pressing process (wine making).
Confirmed results:
Result: 3 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 14:15, 24 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 24 Apr 2010 at 18:46:54 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Picture about a particular structure along the coast of Brest
Can I asking why?--Llorenzi (talk) 15:30, 18 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Well, I think pictures should have one main subject and the rest of the image should draw your eye to the subject. --The High Fin Sperm Whale 21:29, 18 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
SO, I think that the main subject of the picture is this particular structure, and all the others things are just background, and not distracting me at all...--Llorenzi (talk) 08:34, 19 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 2 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--Cayambe (talk) 07:09, 25 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 29 Apr 2010 at 06:10:41 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 10:08, 25 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 3 May 2010 at 04:08:31 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Cloud to cloud lightning strike. Taken in Victoria, Australia in November 2008
Thank you for nominating this image. Unfortunately, it does not fall within the Guidelines and is unlikely to succeed for the following reason: too small --99of9 (talk) 07:23, 24 April 2010 (UTC)[reply] Anyone other than the nominator who disagrees may override this template by changing {{FPX}} to {{FPX contested}} and adding a vote in support. Voting will then continue in the usual way. If not contested within 24 hours, this nomination may be closed.

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 25 Apr 2010 at 22:41:50 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
Confirmed results:
Result: 4 support, 3 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 04:53, 26 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 25 Apr 2010 at 21:05:01 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Tabletop photography
Confirmed results:
Result: 26 support, 2 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 04:56, 26 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Food and drink

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 26 Apr 2010 at 12:26:15 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
Confirmed results:
Result: 7 support, 6 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 17:03, 26 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 26 Apr 2010 at 19:19:28 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

View of the Salto Angel (Angel Falls, named after Jimmie Angel) from the path overlooking the right bank of the creek created by the falls. Picture taken during dry season, when the falls have a small discharge. Angel Falls are the highest falls on earth. They are 979m high, including a 807m free fall.
Confirmed results:
Result: 2 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 19:34, 26 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 26 Apr 2010 at 15:41:30 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  •  Info everything by Mbz1 -- Mbz1 (talk) 15:41, 17 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment This image is a behavior shot of a rare interaction and IMO interesting interaction between the turtle and the duck. Just few minutes before the shot was taken

the turtle had its head out File:Red-eared_sliders_and_Mallard_in_Golden_Gate_Park.jpg. The duck continued to investigate the turtle for some time.

Confirmed results:
Result: 7 support, 2 oppose, 2 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 17:08, 26 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Reptiles

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 26 Apr 2010 at 19:06:45 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Lion cub with mother
  •  Info created by Atomicbre - uploaded by Blurpeace - nominated by Blurpeace Blurpeace 19:06, 17 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Support Blurpeace 19:06, 17 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Support --The High Fin Sperm Whale 19:17, 17 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Support Cute. --Tomascastelazo (talk) 20:02, 17 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Oppose The cub is very cute. The light is dull and so are colors, the contrast is low . I have doubts about the white balance too; the picture looks blueish to me. I think less green grass at the bottom would equal less distraction. I am sorry. Crapload (talk) 20:06, 17 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Oppose Contrast/light problems. Very interesting subject, but not quite up to snuff on the technical side. Steven Walling 21:52, 17 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Oppose No information (location, etc., or whether captive or wild); and odd blue-green tone on blurred animal at left edge - MPF (talk) 00:14, 18 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment, so the current issues are colors and lighting (and a possible coloration error in the top-right corner). Could a crop and some adjustments in Photoshop correct these? Blurpeace 03:39, 18 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    •  Comment, er, no! the current issues also include a complete lack of information about the photo, such as where it was taken, and whether the animals are wild or captive. Photoshop can't answer those! - MPF (talk) 07:42, 18 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
      • I purposefully ignored that concern; easily answerable by questioning the uploader. Blurpeace 08:36, 18 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
        • OK, go ahead and try! Forgive me if I tend to be a bit cynical on the topic, as I've seen far too many images with minimal information moved from wikis to commons, where the original uploader is long gone as a contributor and doesn't reply to such requests. Also note that unless there are exceptional mitigating circumstances, I wouldn't ever support a photo of a captive animal outside of its natural habitat for featured picture status. Featured status covers more aspects than just photographic image quality. - MPF (talk) 09:20, 18 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
      • From the nomination guidelines: "Value - our main goal is to feature most valuable pictures from all others". Zoo pictures are cheap and easy to take, so are not valuable. They also usually do not show an animal (or plant) in its natural behaviour, ecology or surroundings, so are misleading to viewers, giving a false impression or inaccurate information. Pictures of species in the wild are more difficult to take, but also more representative of the species, and that greatly increases their relative value. In this photo for example, I took a close look at the vegetation; it is all European species, not African species that one would expect to see in a photo of lions. This has other manifestations; compare the camouflage of these lions against their surrounds, compared to e.g. this pic or this. Exceptions? Where the conditions of captivity are not obvious, with surrounds appropriate to the species, as in e.g. this one (also in the FP candidates), where the background species (Picea abies) is one among which the animal would naturally occur. - MPF (talk) 13:04, 19 April 2010 (UTC) PS any progress on getting the location information? - MPF (talk) 13:06, 19 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
        • MPF, with all respect, your diatribe is full of air. You cannot state categorically that zoo pictures are either cheap or easy to take. They may be easy, but they do dot diminish their possible value. Value in this case will reside elsewhere. A lion is a lion is a lion, regardless of where it is. Zoo pictures may in fact provide a better physical visual description than will pictures in the wild, it is so relative. One thing is to state what you say as your opinion, to which you have a right, but another is to state it as a universal value. You vote support for pictures of much, much easier subjects that offer even less technical difficulties, such as flowers, and yet deny the aesthetic value of this picture, that while in captivity, it has more photographic redeeming value than many pictures here. And the problen again is that this type of voting discourages participation. --Tomascastelazo (talk) 14:33, 19 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
          • It's not a diatribe, it's just an explanation, responding to a request. "You vote support for pictures of much, much easier subjects that offer even less technical difficulties, such as flowers" - yes, they do present difficulties. There are few photographs of plants in their natural environment on Commons; the ability to identify species accurately is a rare one, and few people who have it are willing to donate their images free to Commons, as it negates their option of making any living from their expertise. "And the problen again is that this type of voting discourages participation" - where's your evidence for that assertion? - MPF (talk) 15:04, 19 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
            • MPF, I´ve been around photography for a long, long time, deeply involved in the craft in many levels, and that includes contests, exhibits, teaching, organizing, promoting, and with personal upfront experiences in the interaction between people and photography, their philosophy and psychology, and that has put me in touch with the personal motivations of people that makes them participate. It is a level much more personal than this, and I assume, based on those long years and a proven track record, as to what motivates people to participate. And probably the single most important variable in the equation is the judging process. That process has to have a very high level of integrity in the way it operates, based on solid ground rules that rest on universally agreed on photographic principles that include technique, difficulty, aesthetics, etc., etc. and which I have pointed out many times, in my opinion, are lacking here. The sad thing is that the potential of this forum is not materialized because the practices of voting many, many times reject valuable photographs based on bogus photographic criteria, such as "poor composition", "noise", etc., Believe me, if Ansel Adams were to upload some of his pictures here, he too would be voted out. All I am saying is for people to learn the distinctions of what constitutes generally good photography and move away from the popularity contest that seems to prevail. --Tomascastelazo (talk) 16:07, 19 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
            • But this isn't a photographic competition! It is to emphasize the best examples for the project's scope, which means things like scientific and educational value are at least equally significant (if not more significant; I would certainly consider more so) than photographic quality alone. - MPF (talk) 17:02, 19 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
              • But it is a selection process, and most of the images are photographic, and besides whatever nebulous criteria there is to selecting FPs, you cannot bypass the photographic issues in the selection process. Before FP, it is a photograph. The base from which you build up. Even if you were to consider just the nebulous criteria, the quality of the vote depends on the quality of the intellectual capital of the observer in each particular case. Some people may have the intellectual capital to judge bug pictures, but not flower or social-content pictures. Nobody has it all. What I do, if I do not like a picture, but know nothing of the subject matter, I don´t vote. A no vote does not interfere with what could otherwise be a valuable picture to a certain discipline. But an oppose vote in a subject which I know nothing about serves no one... just a worthless opinion that may do harm. --Tomascastelazo (talk) 18:20, 19 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Oppose Poor image of lion in background. Also fails on image documentation. Snowmanradio (talk) 12:01, 22 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Alternative

[edit]

Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Edited version
Crop, white balance, black point, white point
I uploaded an edit. My intention was not to make an FP candidate because I cannot fix all problems. I just wanted to share what I would do to improve it, still thinking it is not an FP material pretty much because of the light. To my taste, I fixed the white balance. Maybe trying to get rid of the blue cast, I overdid it. Crop, obviously. White and black points, but I do not feel this significantly helped. I can repeat and elaborate what I still do not like about the picture, but got to switch to another task right now. Maybe later. Best wishes, Crapload (talk) 06:51, 18 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 3 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 08:46, 27 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 30 Apr 2010 at 19:49:07 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
Confirmed results:
Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 08:50, 27 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Historical

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 27 Apr 2010 at 09:53:22 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Eurasian lynx at zoo
  • I think that my comments are entirely appropriate under this FP nomination. I do not think that my talk page is the right place to discuss this more widely. If you wish to discuss wider aspects of this topic more widely, then you could start a discussion elsewhere rather than here. My aim is to inform the author, and I guess that the author now has adequate information to choose a file extension in the lower-case or the upper-case. I presume that most users would want there FP images to be compliant with the most number of language wikipedias possible. Commons specifically links the en wiki guidelines, so I do not see any logic in disregarding this recommendation quoting a particular language wikipedia that does not have any guidelines on this topic. I hope that my comments and your comments have provided useful information to the author, and I am hoping to hear his views. Snowmanradio (talk) 20:26, 25 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • My view is that this is a topic of little concern. I usually don't even check what case the extension is before upload, but rather keep the default of whatever software I have been using, which most often is lower case. However, as I understand the referred page (Commons:First steps/Upload form), it deals with file names, not extensions. My reasoning has two grounds: 1. The file extension is not in a specific language, so there would be no need to refer to specific language rules for that part. 2. All other language versions of the page (including linked wp policies) that I can make any sense of deal with the name, but not with the extension. The Swedish version actually has a bad file name example with upper case extension, explaining why to change the name but not mentioning the extension at all. If a convention from enwi is to be regarded as anything else than general information on Commons, it should be agreed on here and be included in the guides. /Dcastor (talk) 23:54, 25 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Support A good photograph of the anatomy of the upper body of this cat; although, not in its natural environment. I have made the English part of the image description more readable and added a standard summary table. Translations of the image description into more languages would be welcome. Snowmanradio (talk) 15:45, 25 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Question I think the photograph would be more meaningful if the animal could be identified to subspecies level. Is the origin of these cats in the Swedish zoo known? Are they originally from the Swedish population of lynxes? 16:09, 25 April 2010 (UTC)
    •  Info I have tried to find info online on this, but can not find anything. The English Wikipedia article on the en:Eurasian Lynx states that "precise classification of the subspecies of the Eurasian Lynx is still the subject of debate". Since the zoo at hand only shows animals of the Nordic fauna (present and historic), my guess would be lynx lynx lynx, but I can not find any confirmation of this. /Dcastor (talk) 18:26, 25 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 15 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 14:40, 27 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Mammals

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 30 Apr 2010 at 23:17:48 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Rhododendron 'A. Bedford' Flowers
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 08:51, 27 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 27 Apr 2010 at 12:15:46 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Saint Barthélémy church of Gérardmer (France).
Confirmed results:
Result: 3 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 14:42, 27 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 26 Apr 2010 at 21:42:10 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  •  Oppose noisy, and imho composition isn't featured too --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 09:49, 18 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Oppose - A lot of value for me, just before I opened the picture in full size and started to pay attention to detail. A nice composition and theme indeed. Almost too nice, as the posture looks like a pose, the clothes are new and the hand and nails appear clean and neat. I say 'appear' instaed of 'are' because the noise and artifacts are so high that destroy most of the detail. Since it is unlikley that a ISO of only 400 in this excellent camera has produced such a disastrous image one can only conclude that this is the result of a clumsy post-processing. A shame. -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 10:20, 18 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    •  Comment LOL!!! LMAO!!! It is beyond me to actually try to imagine how you must be if you actually think this little discourse of yours will pass as anything but as a very bad joke. It is so bad that it makes the situation really funny!!! You really made my day! Thanks! LOL!!! --Tomascastelazo (talk) 03:19, 19 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Technical quality is not superb at all. But the composition is nice, and you should take into account that this is a 14MP image and not the usual downscaled bullshit.  Support --Dschwen (talk) 16:11, 18 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Support great picture --Simonizer (talk) 21:13, 18 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Support Very nice capture --Lawboy25 (talk) 21:32, 18 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Oppose - Composition, distracting blurred elements at left. Jonathunder (talk) 14:35, 19 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment - I understand it is a generic image, but would be interested to have more info in the description, such as in which city/country was this taken. --Elekhh (talk) 01:17, 20 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment Info added to description... photo taken in the city of Guanajuato, Mexico.
Confirmed results:
Result: 15 support, 6 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 08:48, 27 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: People

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 27 Apr 2010 at 15:38:51 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
Confirmed results:
Result: 3 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 19:23, 27 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 27 Apr 2010 at 15:22:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  •  Info created, uploaded, nominated by -- Tomascastelazo (talk) 15:22, 18 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Support -- Tomascastelazo (talk) 15:22, 18 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Support --The High Fin Sperm Whale 21:14, 18 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Oppose At full res it's a bit too bright and is noisy. I also don't think the other plants obscuring the main subject is the most desirable composition, though I wouldn't oppose on that alone. Steven Walling 05:13, 19 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    •  Comment Noisy? Bright? Come on Steven, you must be joking! As to you liking composition, well, that´s your right to like it or not, and I can live with that. --Tomascastelazo (talk) 13:18, 19 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
      •  Comment From your other comments you seem to think all opposes "must be joking" these days, but I am not. The tops and edges of the cactus are overexposed and slightly fuzzy (this shouldn't occur at all, since it's the central area of focus). As for noise, the surrounding underbrush and secondary areas other than the mountains are unacceptably noisy. Steven Walling 16:55, 19 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    • Steven, I don´t oppose all opposes, and it is easy to chech that... There is no sense in opposing opinions, for they are just that, opinions... but technical issues are another matter. I do challenge the noise issue... look at the sky! That is where noise would be evident. I do not see noise where you point it out, other than what may occur naturally in this medium. Digital photography produces noise in shadow areas, nothing can be done about that, for if I were to adjust for better exposure, thus less noise in shadows, the highlights would be burned out, and you are already complaining about that. The medium has fixed characteristicas as to the dynamic range of the scene, and this is bordering on the mechanical characteristic of the medium, both in the shadows and in the highligths. Get a primer on zone system photography as a background to understanding tone, gray scales, luminosity range, dynamic range, etc., and extrapolate the film lessons to digital photography. Same thing...--Tomascastelazo (talk) 18:10, 19 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Support good pic of the species in its natural environment - MPF (talk) 15:08, 19 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Support--Mbz1 (talk) 18:39, 19 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Oppose -- Correct still ordinary picture. I can't see a reason, either aesthetical or illustrative, why it should be FP. As for the depiction of the species, the cactus is partially hidden by another out-of-focus plant. -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 09:38, 21 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment Alvesgaspar, you should apply your own advice to your own pictures. Neither your arrogant attitude nor your very evident defficient photographic knowledge deserve comment anymore. Make no mistake, in my opinion, you are neither a good photographer nor a good critic. --Tomascastelazo (talk) 14:18, 21 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 5 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 19:21, 27 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 27 Apr 2010 at 15:08:41 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
Confirmed results:
Result: 2 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 19:17, 27 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 1 May 2010 at 14:42:01 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • The first steps guidelines on commons refers to language wikis for formatting guidelines; see Commons:First steps/Upload form, which directly links the en wiki to clearly show that the file extension should be in the lower case (jpg) there. I think that it is common sense and good practice that images candidates here should follow the guidelines in the biggest wiki, the en wiki. Snowmanradio (talk) 09:08, 27 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Commons recommends language wiki guidelines and specifically links to the en wiki guidelines. It says on commons in the fist steps guidelines (linked above); "You should use a descriptive name and follow the draft Commons language policy and/or the Wikipedia naming conventions for the language used, which give guidance on capitalisation, non-alphanumeric characters, etc." Snowmanradio (talk) 17:56, 27 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 0 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 19:24, 27 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 28 Apr 2010 at 18:35:22 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Baby Bell pepper
Yes, it did. I cut the parent pepper off, except small red part at the bottom, but I did not do anything to an amazing baby.--Mbz1 (talk) 19:18, 19 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
That's strange! Did you take any pictures of the two peppers together? :) –Juliancolton | Talk 19:23, 19 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Wow, apparently this is a known phenomenon.  Support for a high-quality illustration of a fascinating topic. –Juliancolton | Talk 19:27, 19 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I di not take that one together with the parent (I wish I did), but I took the other one File:Babies Bell pepper 'Capsicum annuum inside the parent pepper.jpg. Thank you for not loosing ability to get surprised, and for finding info about that at the NET!--Mbz1 (talk) 20:15, 19 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
It is a natural lighting. No flash was used.--Mbz1 (talk) 19:18, 19 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I don't mean to say it's unnatural lighting. It's too dark. Steven Walling 21:26, 19 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, I did not see them at my monitor. I tried to get rid of them now. The lines came from the cover of the book, the pepper was placed to to tkae the image. Do you still see them? Thanks.--Mbz1 (talk) 21:47, 19 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Any better?

[edit]

Baby Bell pepper

Thank you, for adding that to description!--Mbz1 (talk) 01:04, 20 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 12 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 04:54, 29 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Natural phenomena

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 29 Apr 2010 at 05:03:55 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
Confirmed results:
Result: 2 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 06:49, 29 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 29 Apr 2010 at 00:03:06 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Juvenile Bald Eagle
which is true of course. But with f2.8 you will have the shortest possible shutter time which would be good to avoid motion blur (and wings mostly move quite fast). But I really don't get the depth of field addiction which people here seem to have. Amada44 (talk) 20:16, 24 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 15 support, 4 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 05:04, 29 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Birds

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 2 May 2010 at 19:58:20 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 04:44, 29 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 29 Apr 2010 at 11:46:20 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

A black-browed albatross
Confirmed results:
Result: 3 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 13:34, 29 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 3 May 2010 at 11:55:49 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

View of the Danube Delta in romania.
I don't understand your sentence, please in french or english. Cody escadron delta (talk) 06:19, 25 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
What High Fin means by saying "Per Dschwen" is that he opposes for the same reason that Dschwen gave, which is that the image has a blown sky. ~Kevin Payravi (Talk) 17:21, 25 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
It's the sun, look in right or this picture. Cody escadron delta (talk) 06:26, 26 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Info -- Let me try to explain. We use the expression "blown" to designate those parts of the picture that are pure white (with pixel values equal to 255, the maximum) due to excessive light. All cameras, especially the digital ones, have a limited capacity to reproduce the whole range of light intensities we found in the real world (the so-called "dynamic range"). In this case you should have used a larger F number (or a larger shutter speed) or, even better, to chose another angle and avoid pointing to the brighter parts of the sky. -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 22:49, 26 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--Cayambe (talk) 15:10, 29 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 3 May 2010 at 12:31:47 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Pelican and pygmy cormorant in danube delta.
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--Cayambe (talk) 15:07, 29 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 7 May 2010 at 02:23:57 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
Thank you for nominating this image. Unfortunately, it does not fall within the Guidelines and is unlikely to succeed for the following reason: strong flash shadow, uninteresting background, quality is not great for a common subject. --ianaré (talk) 19:15, 28 April 2010 (UTC)[reply] Anyone other than the nominator who disagrees may override this template by changing {{FPX}} to {{FPX contested}} and adding a vote in support. Voting will then continue in the usual way. If not contested within 24 hours, this nomination may be closed.

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 3 May 2010 at 19:09:09 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Aeshna cyanea male in flight
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 08:56, 30 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 3 May 2010 at 18:52:07 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Baker Beach
Confirmed results:
Result: 11 support, 0 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 08:55, 30 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 3 May 2010 at 20:04:19 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 1 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 09:02, 30 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 3 May 2010 at 17:47:39 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Pure electrolytic iron chips and a 1cm3 iron cube
Confirmed results:
Result: 15 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 08:51, 30 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 3 May 2010 at 18:16:32 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Two South American Sea Lion (Otaria flavescens) pups in Patagonia.
Confirmed results:
Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 08:53, 30 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Mammals

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 3 May 2010 at 16:35:23 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
Confirmed results:
Result: 12 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 08:50, 30 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Plants/Flowers

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 4 May 2010 at 06:12:36 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Fossil fish showing a lot of morphological details
Confirmed results:
Result: 17 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 09:05, 30 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects