Commons:Featured picture candidates/Log/May 2022

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 4 May 2022 at 15:16:52 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
Confirmed results:
Result: 19 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 23:58, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Plants#Family : Liliaceae

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 4 May 2022 at 16:38:02 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
Confirmed results:
Result: 15 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 23:57, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural/United States#Alaska

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 4 May 2022 at 14:06:18


  • I don't see... how it isn't proven, and that's kind of the problem. There's only one possible way - Crown copyright - this isn't a copyright violation, and there's literally no evidence of that, and incredibly strong evidence - the actual source - saying this is definitely under UK copyright. The complacency about copyright around a pretty clearcut case is why I'm nominating it here. Adam Cuerden (talk) 17:13, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Abstain Let's defer to the DD here ... if the image is deleted this discussion is moot. Daniel Case (talk) 17:54, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep There's a good chance that it will be deleted. But there's also a good chance that it will be undeleted rather soon (2027), and I think it would only be fair if it would still be considered a FP when it comes back. --El Grafo (talk) 08:07, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
No question. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:01, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Confirmed results:
Result: 1 delist, 1 keep, 0 neutral => not delisted. /--Aristeas (talk) 05:26, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 5 May 2022 at 08:12:19 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
Confirmed results:
Result: 21 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 13:21, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Birds/Anseriformes#Genus : Anas

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 1 May 2022 at 19:50:31 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Dorothy Houston Jacobson at her desk as USDA Assistant Secretary for International Affairs

Confirmed results:
Result: 7 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 02:04, 2 May 2022 (UTC))[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: People#People at work
The chosen alternative is: File:Dorothy Houston Jacobson 1967.jpg

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 5 May 2022 at 21:38:33 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Wood Sorrel (Oxalis acetosella). Focus stack of 30 frames
Confirmed results:
Result: 29 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Aristeas (talk) 06:58, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Plants

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 2 May 2022 at 06:18:43 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Altschlossfelsen near Eppenbrunn, Rhineland-Palatinate, Germany
Confirmed results:
Result: 8 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 14:48, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural/Germany#Rhineland-Palatinate

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 2 May 2022 at 12:56:10 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Airview of Yedikule
  •  Comment The record of smog is valuable, as hopefully a period of past history in a future of renewable energy, but is it beautiful or great? That's my dilemma, whether to vote for the rest of the photo, oppose because of the smog or just not vote. So far, not voting has won out for me. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:42, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment I understand, Ikan, and in no way did I mean to criticize you. I just saw the danger that readers may only see the negative side of your well-balanced statement about the smog. Several times I have observed that as soon as someone has raised a convincing objection against a picture, others only join in with a “per”. There is nothing to be said against the “per” (I also often vote with “per”), but it is a pity when the discussion becomes one-sided too quickly – in my opinion, every good picture deserves a broader discussion that points out its pros and cons. So I try to emphasize the strengths of an image – to stimulate discussion and to contribute hereby to a fair overall outcome; especially when I find that an argument (like the smog here) can also be interpreted the other way around. Best, --Aristeas (talk) 08:05, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 4 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 14:47, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 2 May 2022 at 13:07:36 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
Confirmed results:
Result: 16 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:43, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural/New Zealand#Canterbury (Waitaha)

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 2 May 2022 at 19:59:18 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
Confirmed results:
Result: 12 support, 7 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:42, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 10 May 2022 at 08:26:46 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Nature reserve “Westruper Heide” at the flowering of the heath, Haltern am See, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /XRay 💬 04:24, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 3 May 2022 at 16:26:31 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Spherical panoramic in Sihlwald in autumn
 Comment Obviously I like spherical panoramics and the immersiveness they generate (note that we have almost none of them as FPs of natural places), that's why I create and nominate them. But I think this place and its "unspoiled autumn vibes" would certainly also make it a valid FPC to me in a 2D picture. But that is of course a matter of taste, and I appreciate your opinion and can see this point of view. --Domob (talk) 04:16, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 4 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:25, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 3 May 2022 at 14:27:19 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Far view over Lake Constance to the Alps
Confirmed results:
Result: 3 support, 6 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:26, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 8 May 2022 at 00:13:42 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Il trovatore
Confirmed results:
Result: 12 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Aristeas (talk) 05:14, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Non-photographic_media/Entertainment#Music_and_Opera

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 4 May 2022 at 10:31:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

La Grace (ship, 2010)
You are right on the fact that there is "some" clarity :), as the clarity level is at +80 with Lightromm. But I don't plan to decrease it as I actually like it like that. However thanks you for the comment. Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:32, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Then I'm very sorry but that's an  Oppose for me :( Very beautiful picture, but the clarity trigger was pushed too far to my tastes. - Benh (talk) 09:33, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 21 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:08, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects/Vehicles/Water_transport#Sailing_ships

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 8 May 2022 at 10:39:35 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Bluecheek butterflyfishes (Chaetodon semilarvatus), Temple, Sharm el-Sheikh, Red Sea, Egypt.
  • IamMM, Ikan Kekek: I've added in the description page the ids of the other 2 fish species on the picture and also 2 coral species I could easily id. I can figure out the ids of at least 2 more coral species depicted here that I'll add later (I've documented those ids but I cannot access that source right now), Poco a poco (talk) 17:49, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 16 support, 0 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:07, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Fish#Family_:_Chaetodontidae_(Butterflyfishes)

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 8 May 2022 at 11:36:02 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

The Heart Nebula
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 1 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:07, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 4 May 2022 at 18:30:03 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

A small tortoise shell butterfly pollinating a Glebionis coronaria or Crown Daisy flower in Darjeeling, India
Confirmed results:
Result: 2 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--A.Savin 23:42, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 4 May 2022 at 17:14:43 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Coral (Acropora hemprichii), Ras Katy, Sharm el-Sheikh, Egypt
Confirmed results:
Result: 8 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 23:41, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals#Class_:_Anthozoa

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 5 May 2022 at 10:13:59 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Fishing Net Raising
Confirmed results:
Result: 16 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Aristeas (talk) 15:50, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Industry#India

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 9 May 2022 at 15:18:18 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

American robin making an alarm call
Confirmed results:
Result: 17 support, 0 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 22:58, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family_:_Turdidae_(Thrushes)

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 5 May 2022 at 18:59:49 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Part of the Kyffhäuser memorial with memorial of Kaiser Wilhelm I.

Alternative image

[edit]

The Kyffhäuser memorial with the platform and the tower with Kaiser Wilhelm I.

Confirmed results:
Result: 10 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 22:57, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects/Sculptures#Monuments and memorials

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 9 May 2022 at 19:08:46 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Pink morning in the Gorgany mountains
Confirmed results:
Result: 18 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 22:59, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural#Ukraine

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 6 May 2022 at 00:59:30 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

The Kinner Kailash range and the town of Kalpa.

* Oppose Very picturesque, and it would probably fully satisfy me if there were some strategically placed clouds above the mountains. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:20, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Support I hestiated a bit because the buildings in the foreground are a bit soft. But this can be explained by the need for strong noise reduction which was caused by the shadow on that area. Yes, the cloudless morning sky looks almost too grand to be real. But why shouldn’t the sunrise over the holy mountain Kinnaur Kailash, traditionally believed to be Shiva’s winter residence ([1]), be perfectly clear and serene? ;–) --Aristeas (talk) 07:28, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment Good argument. On that basis, I've crossed out my opposing vote. Although one could argue that with Shiva being the Destroyer, a more dramatic sky with swirling clouds could be good. :-) -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:31, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 5 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--Aristeas (talk) 06:58, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 10 May 2022 at 08:24:44 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Nature reserve “Westruper Heide” at the flowering of the heath, Haltern am See, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany
Confirmed results:
Result: 11 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 13:11, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural/Germany#North_Rhine-Westphalia

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 9 May 2022 at 20:45:21 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Idol of goddess Kali kept near Nimtala ghat for Visarjan or Immersion in the waters of river Hooghly.jpg
Confirmed results:
Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 13:10, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects/Sculptures#Figurines and statuettes

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 10 May 2022 at 20:03:56 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Magna Lykseth as Isolde in Tristan och Isolde at Kungliga Operan 1909.
Confirmed results:
Result: 13 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 02:03, 7 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: People#Musicians_and_singers_performing

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 10 May 2022 at 13:52:10 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
Confirmed results:
Result: 12 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 02:02, 7 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects/Sculptures#Figurines and statuettes

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 10 May 2022 at 14:51:08 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Mangos
Confirmed results:
Result: 19 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 02:03, 7 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Food_and_drink#Fruits_(raw)

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 10 May 2022 at 14:53:20 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Renfe class 100 between Narbonne and Port-la-Nouvelle, France
Confirmed results:
Result: 12 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 02:04, 7 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects/Vehicles/Land_vehicles#Rail_vehicles

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 11 May 2022 at 05:51:59 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--A.Savin 13:10, 7 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 11 May 2022 at 15:37:11 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Swelling flower bud of Allium ursinum
Confirmed results:
Result: 20 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 00:32, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Plants/Asparagales#Family : Amaryllidaceae

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 11 May 2022 at 13:29:25 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

A grey heron (Ardea cinerea)
Confirmed results:
Result: 17 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 00:33, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Birds/Pelecaniformes#Genus_:_Ardea

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 7 May 2022 at 15:57:37 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Red fire extinguisher on a bright blue wall in the gristmill from Weipertshofen, Hohenlohe Open-air Museum, Schwäbisch Hall, Germany
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects#Containers
  •  Info A modern red fire extinguisher on a bright blue wall in the historical gristmill from Weipertshofen, Hohenlohe Open-air Museum near Schwäbisch Hall, Germany. The complete hallway of that mill is painted blue. In the 19th century, the invention of synthetic ultramarine made blue wall paints affordable for the first time. Some people were so excited about that new colour that they painted complete houses (example) or complete rooms with it :–). All by me, --Aristeas (talk) 15:57, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Support I was fascinated by the contrast between the vivid red of the fire extinguisher and the bright blue of the wall. And I like the lines – the beams of the timber framing are (more or less) rectangular, but the single diagonal beam and the diagonal shadows cross them, adding some dynamics to the image. Thanks to Cart for suggesting to nominate this photo :–). --Aristeas (talk) 15:57, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment Two issues for me: (1) the electric switch and socket, (2) the extinguisher is slightly off centre. Both can easily be fixed by a slight crop as suggested. --Kreuzschnabel 17:41, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • I am afraid I would have to oppose a cropped version as it would be clearly worse than this one. The switch is great because it provides something else to look at. Cmao20 (talk) 13:05, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment Thank you for your interesting suggestion, Kreuz. Since last night I have been thinking about whether to propose such a crop as an alternative. I have been hesitant so far, as alternatives always make voting a bit more complex. Several users have given reasons for keeping the switch in the picture; for me, the graphic structure of the lines is another reason – the cable emphasizes the right-angled structure of the timber framing, so that the diagonal beam and the light/shadow strips contrast more strongly with it. Therefore I am foregoing an alternative (for now). Best, --Aristeas (talk) 14:57, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Support As it is --Kritzolina (talk) 19:22, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Support Well-balanced composition with pleasant near-complementary contrast and interesting lighting situation. Taking the hose into account, the extinguisher is almost centered. In my humble opinion, the lead room on the left is okay to direct the viewer to the antique rotary switch and socket, which are an asset to the overall composition. -- Radomianin (talk) 19:57, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Nice that you understand the three tech eras represented in photo (wall, switch, extinguisher). --Cart (talk) 20:03, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 16 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 00:36, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects#Containers

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 16 May 2022 at 12:04:38 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Storm in Tortuguero
Thank you for nominating this image. Unfortunately, it does not fall within the Guidelines and is unlikely to succeed for the following reason: Black and white image, quite small for this subject, wrong orientation (should be landscape format). This is not going to pass. Also missing link to FP gallery. You should first try at COM:QIC. Yann (talk) 12:44, 7 May 2022 (UTC)[reply] Anyone other than the nominator who disagrees may override this template by changing {{FPX}} to {{FPX contested}} and adding a vote in support. Voting will then continue in the usual way. If not contested within 24 hours, this nomination may be closed.

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 12 May 2022 at 11:45:10 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Crested hawk-eagle (Nisaetus cirrhatus ceylanensis) feeding on egret
Confirmed results:
Result: 14 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 14:57, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Birds/Accipitriformes#Genus : Nisaetus

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 8 May 2022 at 06:58:15 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Eastern span of the San Francisco Oakland Bay Bridge at night
  • Hmm I can probably reprocess the picture to try to eliminate the ringing artifacts. Perhaps it was oversharpened. The taillight trails are not pixellated. Some modern cars have LED tail lights that blink at a really high frequency, causing the artifacts [4] [5]. dllu (t,c) 04:11, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 16 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 14:59, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Bridges#United States of America

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 12 May 2022 at 11:49:35 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Malabar pied hornbill (Anthracoceros coronatus) female in flight
Confirmed results:
Result: 12 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 14:57, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Birds#Family : Bucerotidae (Hornbills)

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 8 May 2022 at 06:51:04 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

View of Empire State Building from Rockefeller Center New York City
  •  Comment After browsing our FP gallery pages I have taken the liberty to propose another gallery link: IMHO this fits better into our “cityscapes” gallery. I hope this is OK, else just revert my edit. --Aristeas (talk) 08:39, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment Thanks! I have another one that has an even narrower angle of view --- focusing on the One World Trade Center in the background! dllu (t,c) 20:41, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment Well, some people like wider shots and some people like narrower shots, and I totally understand and respect your opinion. I recall you had similar feedback for Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:San Francisco City Hall as seen from 100 Van Ness at dusk.jpg. Personally, I find that super wide panoramas are a little boring as they simply capture everything instead of allowing the photographer to think about what to focus on. The part of the observation deck in frame on the right in File:NYC Top of the Rock Pano.jpg is annoying. Regarding "it does not overwhelm me in terms of [...] sharpness", it is surprising to hear, but I suspect it is due to atmospheric reasons. At any rate, this photo is 50 megapixels so viewing it at a reasonable size (say, 1 meter across) is quite sharp to my eyes, and vastly more so than viewing most other FPs at that size. dllu (t,c) 21:53, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Support A shot including just the Manhattan skyline, really, is fine. I wonder if there was any reason the Empire State was lit up in all green that day? It couldn't have been for the Jets ... Daniel Case (talk) 02:07, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 14 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 14:59, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Cityscapes#United States

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 17 May 2022 at 07:58:13 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Closeup of match stick heads

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 13 May 2022 at 19:48:21 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Asian ladybeetle (Harmonia axyridis), Hartelholz, Munich, Germany

* Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:34, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

* Support Nice work, though this large ladybird is displacing UK species. Charlesjsharp (talk) 07:29, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Oppose Stupidly, I had not noticed this is dead. Where are the legs?!! I don't like it. Your image will mislead many others, not just someone like me who has done many macros of the species. We should not be offering pictures of dead animals like this at FP. Why do it? When used elsewhere, the statement on the file page that this is dead will be lost. Also, if decay is showing as suggested below, you should withdraw the nomination @Poco a poco: . In any event, the file name should mention that it is dead. Charlesjsharp (talk) 11:05, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Charlesjsharp: We have dozens of dead speciments with the FP star, are there any rules about that?. The suggestion above that the decay process is
  • Ivar: would you mind showing me evidence of a decay process? I know how and where that would be noticeable and I don't see that here, so please, help me with that. FYI Ikan Kekek
  • Charlesjsharp: we have dozens of dead specimens with the FP star. Can you please, explain me how to get this DoF and level of detail of an alive animal. As you have so much experience with macros of this kind of subjects, you may enlight me.
  • I don't understand your comment, Charlesjsharp. If I put a needle on the animal so that it's clearly dead, it's then FP-worthy, that makes no sense to me. Anyhow I'll then rather photograph seeds or stones to spare this kind of discussions. Will also specify to my fossil shots that those animals are dead to clear any room of doubt. --Poco a poco (talk) 17:48, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • You don't understand? Strange. Your image made me (and others) think it was a photo of a live animal. You've done this many times before at QI (can't remember if at FP too) and I have asked you not to. Specimen is the word we use to describe a collected dead animal. These are conventionally photographed on a plain background as with all the FPs I have looked at. Dorsal and ventral images are typically used. You asked 'Can you please, explain me how to get this DoF and level of detail of an alive animal'. Focus-bracketed shots of live insects are common at FP. A steady hand, monopod or tripod can be combined with a camera set-up that allows automatic focus-bracketing, like my Canon R6. I used to use the FB Tube. Helicon Focus software automatically aligns images to compensate for small amounts of movement between shots. Charlesjsharp (talk) 18:10, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Charlesjsharp, I know the principles and indeed I've the hardware and software you talk about (even a motorized slider). I cannot get this detail with a 100 mm or 300 mm macro lens. To achieve that you need to get very close using a special lens like this one that can magnify x5, apart from the flash or lighting. Anyhow, cero motivation to do any macro stuff in the near future --Poco a poco (talk) 18:31, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 11 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Poco a poco (talk) 17:14, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 9 May 2022 at 09:56:11 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Kyiv, Ukraine
Confirmed results:
Result: 6 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--A.Savin 13:55, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 9 May 2022 at 09:55:15 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Kyiv, Ukraine
Confirmed results:
Result: 6 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--A.Savin 13:54, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 9 May 2022 at 07:39:11 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Grey heron at sunset.
Confirmed results:
Result: 5 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--A.Savin 13:54, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 9 May 2022 at 05:31:03 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
Confirmed results:
Result: 3 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--A.Savin 13:52, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 9 May 2022 at 06:11:56 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Alternative

[edit]
Alternative
  •  Support -- IamMM (talk) 21:37, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Support I favor this, as I mentioned above. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:35, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Support Thank you, Ikan, for drawing our attention to the original file. Of course at the first glance I can’t discover much additional information in this file – it has got more pixels but they are less sharp. But on the other hand I also can’t see what “digitally enhanced by rawpixel” has enhanced in the other version (besides downscaling it and increasing the contrast a bit). Because both versions are more or less equivalent for me, I think we should feature the original (this one). --Aristeas (talk) 09:10, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 8 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 13:53, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Satellite images#North America

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 9 May 2022 at 13:40:49 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

American coot
Confirmed results:
Result: 12 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 23:48, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Birds#Family_:_Rallidae_(Coots,_Rails_and_Crakes)

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 9 May 2022 at 20:49:13 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
Confirmed results:
Result: 10 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 23:49, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Cityscapes#Thailand

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 9 May 2022 at 16:24:36 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  •  Comment Agreed, guys, not the sharpest, but this again wins my support for compositional reasons and beauty. If you're able to photograph the same kind of composition with more sharpness, we might be able to consider a remove and replace someday, but I think this deserves the star now. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:19, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 15 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 23:49, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 10 May 2022 at 12:21:51 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Chirkeyskoe reservoir in Dagestan
Confirmed results:
Result: 9 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Aristeas (talk) 14:06, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural/Russia#North Caucasian Federal District

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 13 May 2022 at 00:06:38 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Brooklyn Navy Yard in 1918
Confirmed results:
Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Aristeas (talk) 14:05, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Industry#United%20States

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 10 May 2022 at 08:42:34 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Detail of the Church of the Assumption of Mary in Lychivka, Volochysk Raion, Khmelnytskyi Oblast, Ukraine
Confirmed results:
Result: 18 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Yann (talk) 16:01, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects/Architectural elements#Walls

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 10 May 2022 at 15:46:33 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Intermediate egret (Ardea intermedia) descending to a tree stump
  • Aesthetically, I find the stump rather inelegant, but a tighter crop would still be possible with it. Too much empty space around the bird in the composition in my view -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:23, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 16 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:24, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Birds/Pelecaniformes#Genus_:_Ardea

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 17 May 2022 at 13:56:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Tussock moth (Laelia sp.) in Sri Lanka
  • A revenge vote? have you looked into the FPs of that category? I compared this image with the first 2 I found there (this and this) and the detail here is not bad, but definitely lower than most FPs and lower than what we can see in the category of similar species. --Poco a poco (talk) 17:39, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Oppose Per Poco, the quality is not here, please Charles dont take it personally, you know that you are my friend and I love this image, however, it has less details than any insect FP taken 8 years ago --Wilfredor (talk) 11:52, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 I withdraw my nomination Charlesjsharp (talk) 08:58, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 14 May 2022 at 06:26:40 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gulikan Theyyam Vellattam by Shagil Kannur
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People#Events
  •  Info Theyyam is a ritual art form of Indian state Kerala. It is a fusion of many folk art forms like folk dance, folk music, folk painting and literature.

All by Shagil Kannur -- Shagil Kannur (talk) 06:26, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Top cropped. At the bottom nothing can be done. Imfo edited. Now please review your opinion Ikan Kekek -- Shagil Kannur (talk) 01:23, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
More infos added. Now please reconsider your vote Poco a poco. --Shagil Kannur (talk) 12:07, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
To me it is better to have some breathing space at the top as the person is looking towards the sky. --Shagil Kannur (talk) 12:02, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

) 12:57, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Only one person, that is Shajiarikkad is not known to me. I have no idia where does he come from in this nomination. All other supporters are active users in Commons. Some of them have voted my previous nominations too. Among those Sreejith K is one of the admins of Commons. Vijayanrajapuram is an another admin in ml.wiki and an active Commons user. Other persons like Karikkan, Vijayakumarblathur, Navaneethpp are also active Commons users. Moreover all these are eminant photographers. Indeed these are all belong to my home wikipedia community, that is ml.wiki. We have discussed how to make that image more beautiful a day before. And it was a very casual discussion that I used to do with my all nominations. Still there are many other users who put forward their opinion on this image and not supported this nomination. THIS IS THE FACT. --Shagil Kannur (talk) 18:52, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
How many of them have voted on any other nominations on this page? The fact that they all suddenly came here speaks for itself. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:17, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Was the “casual discussion” on a wiki forum? If yes, then please post a link here, even if it is not in English. If it was on a different online forum, please post link. This is indeed dangerously close to canvassing. I haven’t changed my vote yet, but probably will. So far I’m assuming good faith. UnpetitproleX (talk) 01:17, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
It was a WhatsApp group of wikipedians. Mainly discussed about the cropping of this image. I wish I could share screen shots with you. -- Shagil Kannur (talk) 16:36, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
My feeling is that it's fine to ask for advice about edits, but you should have explained that no-one reading there should vote on this nomination. What you did had the effect of canvassing, whether you expected all these folks to come here just to vote for your nomination or didn't think about that as a likely occurrence. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:39, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

And if you consider this is a disqualification, I am ready to withdraw my nomination -- Shagil Kannur (talk) 18:56, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 19 May 2022 at 16:43:20 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Parliament building of Quebec, Canada


Thank you for nominating this image. Unfortunately, it does not fall within the Guidelines and is unlikely to succeed for the following reason: Does not meet COM:QI standards, sorry. --A.Savin 18:49, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply] Anyone other than the nominator who disagrees may override this template by changing {{FPX}} to {{FPX contested}} and adding a vote in support. Voting will then continue in the usual way. If not contested within 24 hours, this nomination may be closed.

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 11 May 2022 at 18:04:04 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

HTMS Maeklong during sunset at Chulachomklao Fort
Confirmed results:
Result: 19 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:08, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects/Vehicles/Water_transport#Ships

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 15 May 2022 at 22:02:17 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Apple tree and wheat field in summer, near Hoheneggelsen, Hildesheim county, Lower Saxony, Germany
  • That is not a valid reason for FPX, I'm afraid. As far as the guidelines go, there's nothing wrong with this photo, it's just not all that wow-y. The proper procedure is explained here: If it has no support other than the nominator's after 5 days, it will be speedily declined automatically. --El Grafo (talk) 10:17, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 8 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--A.Savin 11:17, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 12 May 2022 at 07:30:49 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
Confirmed results:
Result: 10 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 11:20, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Austria

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 16 May 2022 at 04:17:43 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Scabricola bicolor (Swainson, 1824); length 1.9 cm; Originating from the Nacala Bay, Mozambique
Confirmed results:
Result: 16 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Aristeas (talk) 10:20, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Shells#Family : Mitridae

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 12 May 2022 at 10:11:34 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

The valley of Zletovo River
Confirmed results:
Result: 6 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--A.Savin 11:21, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 12 May 2022 at 06:56:42 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
Confirmed results:
Result: 12 support, 7 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--A.Savin 11:18, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 16 May 2022 at 18:35:17 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Anthyllis vulneraria
Confirmed results:
Result: 20 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 01:17, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Plants#Family_:_Fabaceae

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 12 May 2022 at 20:50:02 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Former Bethanien Hospital
Confirmed results:
Result: 13 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 01:19, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Interiors#Germany

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 12 May 2022 at 14:52:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

An elderly Buddhist monk walks up a wooded mountain trail near the Dalai Lama's residence in McLeod Ganj, Himachal Pradesh.
Confirmed results:
Result: 4 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 01:19, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 16 May 2022 at 18:32:29 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

White-plumed Honeyeater
Confirmed results:
Result: 24 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 01:18, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family_:_Meliphagidae_(Honeyeaters)

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 13 May 2022 at 09:42:43 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

A juvenile black redstart (Phoenicurus ochruros) perched on a post
Confirmed results:
Result: 16 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 14:28, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 17 May 2022 at 13:39:51 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Blue-tailed bee-eater (Merops philippinus) in Yala National Park, Sri Lanka
Confirmed results:
Result: 11 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 23:44, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Birds#Family : Meropidae (Bee-eaters)

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 13 May 2022 at 20:32:57 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
Confirmed results:
Result: 21 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 23:45, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 13 May 2022 at 19:30:27 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Giant moray (Gymnothorax javanicus), Ras Katy, Sharm el-Sheikh, Red Sea, Egypt.
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Fish#Family_:_Muraenidae_(Moray_Eels)
  •  Info Giant moray (Gymnothorax javanicus) surrounded by net fire coral (Millepora dichotoma), Ras Katy, Sharm el-Sheikh, Red Sea, Egypt. This species of marine fish is the largest moray eel in terms of body mass (the slender giant moray is the largest in terms of body length, though). The giant moray can reach up to 3 m (9.8 ft) in length and 30 kg (66 lb) in weight. While juveniles are tan in color with large black spots, adults have black specks that grade into leopard-like spots behind the head. It's widespread in the Indo-Pacific region, being found from eastern coast of Africa, Red Sea included, until the Pitcairn group, Hawaiian islands and also Polynesia. North to south Japan and south to New Caledonia, Fiji and the Austral Islands. It lives in lagoons and on the outer slopes of coral reefs. During the day, it sits sheltered in crevices between 1 and 50 meters deep. The giant moray is carnivorous (feeds on fish and occasionally on crustaceans) and nocturnal, hunting its prey within the reef. It is known to engage in cooperative hunting with the roving coral grouper (Plectropomus pessuliferus). These two fish species are complementary hunters: While the eel hunts in the reef, it may scare prey up and out of the reef, leaving them to be eaten by the grouper. Similarly, the grouper hunting above the reef may cause prey to attempt to seek refuge in the reef, where the moray may ambush them. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 19:30, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 19:30, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 04:17, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Support Nicely framed by the coral. You should put all that description on the file page, where it'll be easier to find. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:35, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 13 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 23:45, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Fish#Family_:_Muraenidae_(Moray_Eels)

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 17 May 2022 at 19:26:59 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Stellate puffer (Arothron stellatus), Ras Katy, Sharm el-Sheikh, Red Sea, Egypt
Confirmed results:
Result: 16 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 23:43, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Fish#Family_:_Tetraodontidae_(Pufferfish)

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 14 May 2022 at 21:25:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Black-and-white warbler
Confirmed results:
Result: 13 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 00:18, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 18 May 2022 at 15:58:11 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

File:Siebenpunkt-Marienkäfer (Coccinella septempunctata) auf Blüte im FFH-Gebiet "Viernheimer Waldheide und angrenzende Flächen".jpg
Confirmed results:
Result: 20 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 00:17, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Arthropods#Family_:_Coccinellidae_(Ladybugs)

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 18 May 2022 at 15:17:41 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Snowy egret
Confirmed results:
Result: 15 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 00:17, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Birds/Pelecaniformes#Genus_:_Egretta

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 14 May 2022 at 13:43:46 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Polianytsia Reginal Park, Ukraine
Confirmed results:
Result: 10 support, 6 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--A.Savin 00:16, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 19 May 2022 at 10:54:34 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
Confirmed results:
Result: 12 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:16, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Interiors#Germany

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 15 May 2022 at 06:40:04 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Nelumbo nucifera, also known as Indian lotus in bud stage
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants#Family : Nelumbonaceae
  • All by Subhrajyoti07 -- Subhrajyoti07 (talk) 06:40, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Support -- Subhrajyoti07 (talk) 06:40, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Neutral Not sharp enough for me and noise.--Famberhorst (talk) 15:38, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment - Added selective denoising. - Subhrajyoti07 (talk) 18:04, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Oppose I think the background is too busy here. --Rohieb (talk) 22:12, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Oppose The background is unattractive, too busy. --Cayambe (talk) 05:27, 7 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Moral support IMHO this photo deserves a little bit love ;–). I like the mood, the soft light and the delicate colours, and the background is IMHO really not bad because it melts away but still intimates the natural surroundings of this plant. Of course, on this page (FPC) we are now used to wonderful close-up photographs of buds and flowers which are completely sharp, created with focus stacking, and compared to them this picture seems to disappoint. But it’s a bit unfair to compare it to the focus-stacking images: this shot just belongs to a different genre. Such close-up photographs of flowers with low DoF are indeed quite popular (see Flickr), some great photographers have indulged in that genre, and while their educational value may be lower than the one of the focus-stacking shots, the best low-DoF flower photos are real artworks which have their value in themselves. Now this photo is not a perfect example – the background is a bit busy and I would prefer if at least the central part of the bud was perfectly crisp and sharp. But it’s not easy to achieve this (that’s another reason why really good low-DoF flower photos are indeed works of art ;–), therefore my moral support for this appealing photo. --Aristeas (talk) 09:52, 7 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    I am truly touched by your words on this photo Aristeas. Whether this photo becomes FP is a different issue. But I will certainly carry these encouraging words with me. God bless you. - Subhrajyoti07 (talk) 10:48, 7 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you! – Changed from ‘weak support’ to ‘support’ per Cmao20’s statement below. --Aristeas (talk) 05:47, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 9 support, 2 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:18, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Plants#Family : Nelumbonaceae

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 19 May 2022 at 09:04:40 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Painted stork (Mycteria leucocephala) with fish
Confirmed results:
Result: 16 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:17, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Birds#Family : Ciconiidae (Storks)

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 15 May 2022 at 17:52:51 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Depiction of the original production of Ruddygore by Gilbert and Sullivan
Confirmed results:
Result: 7 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:26, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Non-photographic_media/Entertainment#Music_and_Opera

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 19 May 2022 at 16:03:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

John Milton Brannan
Confirmed results:
Result: 13 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:24, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: People/Portrait#Men

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 19 May 2022 at 17:30:40 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION

All by Shagil Kannur -- Shagil Kannur (talk) 17:30, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:23, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 16 May 2022 at 04:41:38 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Ancient Windmills of Nashtifan
Confirmed results:
Result: 2 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--Aristeas (talk) 06:49, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 20 May 2022 at 12:46:33 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Focus-stacked image showing head detail of a bull ant. Note the powerful mandibles and large eyes. Specimen collected from Garigal National Park, Sydney NSW Australia.
Confirmed results:
Result: 16 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 13:09, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Arthropods/Hymenoptera#Family : Formicidae (Ants)

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 22 May 2022 at 21:50:17 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

The Sheesh Mahal at Lahore Fort.

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 20 May 2022 at 18:36:59 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Yokohama Stadium seen from Yokohama Landmark Tower
  •  Weak oppose per Kreuzschnabel, a good QI but IMO not an FP level composition Cmao20 (talk) 23:11, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Oppose per others. Maybe with a higher angle and better light, but as is this looks like just another picture of an outdoor stadium in a typical cityscape. Daniel Case (talk) 18:46, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment I withdraw my nomination because it seems impossible to me to get enough positive votes. The nomination of the picture was based on my assessment that in terms of "wow effect", composition and quality, my picture is within the range of recently promoted pictures. I would be happy to receive more substantiated feedback for future nomination: In order to make better pictures, I would like to know what exactly has to be done better regarding lighting or what exactly needs to be improved in the composition. Thank you. Chme82 (talk) 20:32, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  •  I withdraw my nomination Chme82 (talk) 20:32, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 16 May 2022 at 19:38:55 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors#Austria
  •  Info created & uploaded by PtrQs - nominated by Tomer T -- Tomer T (talk) 19:38, 7 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Support -- Tomer T (talk) 19:38, 7 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:46, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Support Excellent artistic photo Cmao20 (talk) 08:06, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment I expect this is a tunnel for skiers to use in the winter. Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:03, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Oppose Very standard image one gets if photographing at the entrance of a tunnel. Just a photo of a friend with backpack on a walk, like anyone might take, and turning it b&w doesn't make it artistic. Compare File:SMP May 2008-9a.jpg and File:The Photographer.jpg where the silhouette is worth capturing. -- Colin (talk) 09:25, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Oppose I agree with Colin.--Ermell (talk) 21:50, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Support Well, as the title says, during winter this is a tunnel for pedestrians passing under the skiing slope (Dreiseenbahn 1), located in Tyrolean Kühtai. Same way, as the photographer of the cited marvellous pictures was fascinated by the contrast of the black and white areas, I was caught by the contrast of the concentric rings of the metal tube focusing my view on the person and the end of the tunnel leading her/us into the invisible world outside. --PtrQs (talk) 00:12, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Support This is one of the rather rare occasions where I'll have to disagree with Colin. In my opinion, this one fits in very well with the other two examples, while still being different enough to stand out. While the other ones focus a lot on the entries and/or exits of the tunnels, the landscape orientation and structured walls in this one put much stronger emphasis on the tunnel itself. The Photographer is about to step into the light. You're just observing, this is not about you. The joggers have already made it to the other side, while you're not even inside yet. You have no clue what they've gone though. But this one puts you right in the darkest part and while you can see the light, there's still a long way to go. The person a few steps ahead of you seems to say "come on, let's go", ready to take your hand and venture into the unknown. Or maybe from over there they can already see something you can't? The silhouette itself may not be as interesting as the one in "The Photographer", but I find the backpack very fitting. One of the strongest symbolic images I've seen here for a while. --El Grafo (talk) 08:12, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I agree. One of the things that really struck me and appealed to me about this photo is precisely that you can see the light at the end of the tunnel, but that's all you can see past the tunnel, and it can represent many things. Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:10, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, yes, lots of things to discover in there - or in yourself, while looking at it. Here's a more fun one: James Bond gun barrel sequence. It's my desktop wallpaper now, which is noteworthy because I usually just use a plain calm color fill. El Grafo (talk) 10:51, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 12 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 22:12, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Interiors#Austria

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 16 May 2022 at 15:11:57 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Sub-adult female Indian leopard, Nagarhole
✓ Done @Poco a poco: My wife was studying the leopard with her binoculars and particularly noticed the green tint in the iris and the pale yellow fur. I've slightly warmed it without losing the greenish iris. --Tagooty (talk) 03:13, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 9 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--A.Savin 22:11, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 16 May 2022 at 15:49:25 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
Confirmed results:
Result: 8 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 22:12, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera#Family_:_Lasiocampidae_(Eggars)

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 24 May 2022 at 17:37:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Frozen ice bubble

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 24 May 2022 at 15:48:53 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gnesta, Sweden, c. 1900

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 22 May 2022 at 03:07:45 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Pyrochroa serraticornis
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:05, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 18 May 2022 at 04:54:13 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Nighttime view of the Ferry Building in San Francisco
Yes, and that's why there are profiles for lens distortion correction in Lightroom profiles, Capture One, etc. --Wilfredor (talk) 23:35, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Wilfredor, perspective distortion is completely different from barrel/pincushion distortion. Lightroom profiles, Capture One, etc correct for the latter. But even the most perfectly corrected rectilinear wide angle lens will have an oval moon in the edge, at the same time while all straight lines are perfectly straight. This is an unavoidable truth of mathematics. Read this article if you're interested. dllu (t,c) 06:23, 16 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 10 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Aristeas (talk) 08:40, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Cityscapes#United States

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 22 May 2022 at 05:49:36 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Bar-shouldered dove
  • Typo? This was shot 'wide open'. Asking for more of a bird this far away to be in focus is not really a demand for high DoF is it? For me, this has no wow. It looks like an ordinary capture of a scene that's all too common. Charlesjsharp (talk) 13:22, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 14 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 16:54, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Birds#Family_:_Columbidae_(Pigeons_and_Doves)

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 22 May 2022 at 05:44:54 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Yponomeuta evonymella
Confirmed results:
Result: 18 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 16:53, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 21 May 2022 at 13:15:55 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION

 I withdraw my nomination fair enough. Cmao20 (talk) 18:39, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:
Result: 4 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--Cmao20 (talk) 18:39, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 18 May 2022 at 22:20:17 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

10-04-2010 in Warsaw
  • Good point, Rhododendrites. This event ripped open deep wounds and trenches at that time. Katyń is a symbol of the great national trauma of the murder of several thousand Polish officers by the Soviets in 1940, the guilt of which was only acknowledged by Gorbachev in 1990. Traumatic was also the denial and suppression of this truth by the communist rulers in the PR Poland. The delegation in the plane wanted to commemorate this crime and was killed with a blow. A week after the accident, I was on the streets of Warsaw during the official mourning ceremonies and felt the paralysis of the people. Perhaps the comparatively usual photo impresses me more because of the personal experience. -- Radomianin (talk) 05:00, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 8 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Aristeas (talk) 06:50, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Historical#1990-now

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 22 May 2022 at 20:54:57 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

White pulse coral (Xenia umbellata), Ras Katy, Sharm el-Sheikh, Egypt
Confirmed results:
Result: 16 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Aristeas (talk) 05:55, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals#Phylum_:_Cnidaria

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 22 May 2022 at 19:57:43 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

White stork (Ciconia ciconia), fitted with transmitter, takes plastic sheeting to its nest.
Confirmed results:
Result: 24 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Aristeas (talk) 05:57, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Birds#Family : Ciconiidae (Storks)

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 18 May 2022 at 22:12:41 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Świętokrzyski Bridge
  •  Comment Świętokrzyski Bridge in Warsaw is an adequate description to me. We see a couple of towers and a bunch of girders. And this is good as an abstract composition, but I haven't decided whether I consider it an FP. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:48, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • @Ezarate: I agree the description was poor. That was in part because of an error which hid the name of the bridge. I've expanded it now. Does this change your vote? Thanks. — Rhododendrites talk14:58, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Oppose This is a great idea but for me it's one of these photos that would have to be roughly symmetrical in the lines and shapes, and the fact that it's a little off centre means it falls a little short to me Cmao20 (talk) 12:39, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Support works for me. yes, would be better if it were symmetrical, but I appreciate the motif/effect. A question, though, near the top-left of the left tower one of the cables seems to just end in mid-air. What's going on there? What don't I understand about the construction? — Rhododendrites talk21:57, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Take a look at File:Most Świętokrzyski 2013 (3).JPG for example. The cables end in black "knobs" near the towers. I think one of these is responsible for the illusion. --Cart (talk) 01:43, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 10 support, 6 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--Aristeas (talk) 06:51, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 23 May 2022 at 06:13:29 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page

Confirmed results:
Result: 18 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Ivar (talk) 17:26, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Shells#Family : Chamidae

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 26 May 2022 at 07:04:56 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION

 I withdraw my nomination Tomer T (talk) 17:31, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 19 May 2022 at 15:24:20 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Swelling leaf bud of a Fagus sylvatica
Confirmed results:
Result: 11 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 21:46, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Plants#Family : Fagaceae

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 19 May 2022 at 20:18:05 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

First live record of gynandromorph Athyma inara inara Westwood, 1850 - Himalayan Colour Sergeant from Buxa Tiger Reserve, West Bengal, India.
Confirmed results:
Result: 14 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 21:46, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 20 May 2022 at 02:35:04 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Chiara Sistermann at the German indoor championships in athletics 2022
  • If you're sure, add that to the description and I will support. As a counterargument to Charles' objection below, the "ABC Wide World of Sports" TV show's opening sequence has very famous footage for "...and the agony of defeat." This is a striking photo that deserves support, but only if the description can put it into context. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:47, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    I added it to description. Thanks, Stepro (talk) 20:35, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 13 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Aristeas (talk) 08:51, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Sports# Individual sports

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 25 May 2022 at 07:23:38 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION

 I withdraw my nomination Thank you for your remarks. Gzen92 [discuter] 07:53, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 20 May 2022 at 08:19:09 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Evening sunlight in a riparian forest at the riverbank of the Southern Bug in the Buzk’s Gard National Nature Park, Mykolaiv Oblast, Ukraine
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Ukraine
  •  Info Gentle evening sunlight in a riparian forest at the riverbank of the Southern Bug in the Buzk’s Gard National Nature Park, Mykolaiv Oblast, Ukraine. Created and uploaded by Vitalii Bashkatov – nominated by --Aristeas (talk) 08:19, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Support A common criticism of landscape images nominated here is that the photographer has overprocessed them. Therefore, I would like to nominate this picture for a change ;–). It is a very atmospheric autumn scene, but IMHO at the same time very natural and realistic. I can almost feel the warm evening sun breaking through the thinning canopy of leaves and bathing the forest in golden light. The fact that there is a slight reduction of contrast in the upper left (almost inevitable due to technical reasons) is not a fault: it contributes significantly to the sunny mood of the picture. --Aristeas (talk) 08:19, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Support as per Aristeas. -- Radomianin (talk) 09:28, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Support some may call it ordinary but I've always admired sunlight filtering through woods. --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 12:13, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Support as per Aristeas. The way you can zoom in and not see any sort of compression makes it seem as if you could look at this image forever and continue noticing things. This image is amazing, how did it go two years on commons without even being nominated for anything? Lallint⟫⟫⟫Talk
  • Lallint, it's great that you are enthusiastic, but please don't use that double symbol. The Bot won't be able to read it and your vote may not be counted. Please use the normal {{s}} and all will be well. --Cart (talk) 14:13, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment Thank you for the hint! However, I understand the picture differently: I believe that this is a stream that actually flows to the right (towards the river Southern Bug) and that its streambed is just largely hidden by the somewhat sloping banks and is only visible in the centre of the picture. Therefore I think there is no tilt. --Aristeas (talk) 06:46, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 20 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 13:10, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural#Ukraine

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 24 May 2022 at 13:46:35 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Eurasian coot (Fulica atra) with chicks
Confirmed results:
Result: 12 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Yann (talk) 21:46, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Birds#Family : Rallidae (Coots, Rails and Crakes)

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 24 May 2022 at 18:06:34 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Lilly Walleni in the opera Daria at Kungliga Operan
Confirmed results:
Result: 11 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Yann (talk) 21:44, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: People#People_at_work

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 24 May 2022 at 16:24:20 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Yann (talk) 21:46, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 24 May 2022 at 15:20:26 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Portrait of a Peacock dance performer
Confirmed results:
Result: 23 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Yann (talk) 21:46, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: People#Events

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 24 May 2022 at 17:13:07 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

looking to the Watzmann in the Berchtesgaden Alps
Confirmed results:
Result: 15 support, 0 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /Yann (talk) 21:45, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural/Germany#Bavaria

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 21 May 2022 at 08:27:38 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
Confirmed results:
Result: 19 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 13:32, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Food and drink#Food : Processing, preparing and cooking

Monsoon in the Western Ghats

[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 27 May 2022 at 00:57:23 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 25 May 2022 at 18:15:09 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Fathabad Mansion

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 25 May 2022 at 12:55:42 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Marbled white (Melanargia galathea) with morning dew in the FFH area "Sand areas between Mannheim and Sandhausen; no focusstack"
Confirmed results:
Result: 15 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Aristeas (talk) 06:00, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 26 May 2022 at 09:27:02 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Track cycling, Stayer, Sparkasse Steher Grand Prix: panned shot of Constantin Lohse (Chemnitz) behind Sven Lohse (Chemnitz, pacemaker)
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 16:57, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 22 May 2022 at 12:33:10 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Republic Museum Ankara
Confirmed results:
Result: 9 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Aristeas (talk) 16:58, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Interiors#Turkey

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 22 May 2022 at 21:00:19 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Church portal of St.Julian's Church, Setúbal, Portugal.
  • Well, I don't feel to be the right person to answer that, rather the heritage responsible in the city council, but I consider the portal around the door much more interesting and ornamental (and probably worthy in terms of legacy) than the door itself. There is not much texture in the door, that's probably the reason why they didn't focus there, and the few features of the door are already subtle lit and can be perceived IMHO Poco a poco (talk) 17:59, 14 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • No, sorry, not an option to me adding on my own any additional lighting to get some areas more lit. Please, assess the image the way it looks in reality. If I add a maglite by myself I could understand that some reviewers opposed because of manipulation. Poco a poco (talk) 20:19, 14 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    ok so if you add flash, it's a manipulation? What about all the underwater pics you take with flash then? Benh (talk) 09:24, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • That's a different animal, Benh. If I light a scene underwater or push the luminance bar to the top during processing I'm not changing the composition. If I add a light to the door it does. That would be a change of the apperance, a change of the ornamental view of the portal. That's at least the way I see it. Poco a poco (talk) 09:38, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • The title leads me to conclude it's an HDR photo, so you have already manipulated reality haven't you? I downloaded your image then reduced shadows and highlights in Photoshop and I liked the result. Charlesjsharp (talk) 11:42, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Like Alexander says below, it's the same. You are (quoting you) "adding additional lighting to get some areas more lit". As long as u don't par away too far from reality, it's fine in my view. Sometimes it even gets you closer to what your eyes can actually see. - Benh (talk) 15:37, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Artificial light (be it the exterior illumination of a structure, flashlight of a camera, or anything else) is always a manipulation of reality, if you like. However I don't see any problem about it. --A.Savin 12:35, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 12 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 04:20, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects/Architectural elements#Doors

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 26 May 2022 at 19:01:01 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
Confirmed results:
Result: 14 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:21, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Settlements#Germany

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 26 May 2022 at 20:39:27 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Hawthorn blossom. Focus stack of 30 frames.
Confirmed results:
Result: 17 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:20, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Plants#Family : Rosaceae
[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 26 May 2022 at 19:00:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page

Confirmed results:
Result: 11 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:20, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Interiors/Religious buildings#London

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 30 May 2022 at 14:40:12 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION

 I withdraw my nomination Tomer T (talk) 16:03, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 27 May 2022 at 18:18:38 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

John Campbell Dancy, Recorder of Deeds, Washington, D.C., head-and-shoulders portrait, in oval, facing slightly right
Confirmed results:
Result: 13 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 01:06, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: People/Portrait#Men

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 27 May 2022 at 17:35:36 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
Confirmed results:
Result: 20 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 01:05, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Mammals#Family : Equidae (Equids)

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 27 May 2022 at 16:39:56 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Oroblanco
Confirmed results:
Result: 17 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 01:04, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Food_and_drink#Fruits_(raw)

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 27 May 2022 at 16:36:33 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Coal train has just left Samper de Calanda, Spain
Confirmed results:
Result: 21 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 01:04, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects/Vehicles/Land_vehicles#Rail_vehicles

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 27 May 2022 at 22:44:15 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Chestnut-headed bee-eater (Merops leschenaulti)
Confirmed results:
Result: 15 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Ivar (talk) 06:12, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Birds#Family : Meropidae (Bee-eaters)

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 24 May 2022 at 19:40:48 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
I don't see noise in the picture Ezarateesteban 17:13, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Me too would be curious to know where noise is. --A.Savin 18:45, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I thought the picture noisy at first glance as well, but then realized that it is the hot air from the fire that is creating these effects. Could it be that this is also what you see as noisy, Daniel Case? Kritzolina (talk) 06:02, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Kritzolina, Ezarate, A.Savin I can see it and I think it's a bit of both. There's certainly some heat involved in the centre, but that does not explain the slightly strange look of the grass or the sausage surfaces, for example. Feels like a bit too much de-noising being countered by a bit too much sharpening (or the other way round). You can see that quite well when zooming in to the face of the log on the left: The fine details get a bit fuzzy with some of the flatter areas in-between being almost posterized. That alone probably would not keep me from supporting, though. El Grafo (talk) 10:45, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Support I looked at this picture several times and each time I find it more interesting. There is wow for me. -- IamMM (talk)
Confirmed results:
Result: 4 support, 6 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--A.Savin 22:18, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 25 May 2022 at 06:57:45 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Buzk's Gard National Nature Park, Ukraine
Personally, I think I'd also prefer the vignetting to be dialed down a bit. But as it serves a purpose and is much less apparent in the full size view (our thumbnailer tends to exaggerate these kinds of things), I'm fine with it as an artistic choice. --El Grafo (talk) 07:59, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Support per Martin and El Grafo. --Aristeas (talk) 08:36, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Support --Yann (talk) 08:52, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Oppose I agree there should be a place for digitally enhanced art works with vignetting and colour manipulation, but the file description should say this and use the appropriate template. The category is wrong as it states 'natural' which is misleading. Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:45, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    FWIW, "Natural" is a misleading term anyway. There's hardly any place left on earth that has not been affected by human activites in one way or another [6], probably none if you consider climate change (well, maybe the deep sea). Some of the most species rich habitats existing in Europe today never would have developed without humans cutting down the trees so their livestock could graze. Now we turn them into nature reserves. "Nature" is an illusion - or at least highly subjective, as is can mean nothing, everything, and anything in between. El Grafo (talk) 09:17, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 24 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 13:06, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural#Ukraine

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 29 May 2022 at 13:07:02 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Mediterranean red sea star (Echinaster sepositus), Arrábida Natural Park, Portugal.
Confirmed results:
Result: 16 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 23:14, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals#Class_:_Asteroidea

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 25 May 2022 at 15:29:23 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
Confirmed results:
Result: 13 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 23:13, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Plants#Family : Pinaceae

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 29 May 2022 at 21:33:04 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Tapestry of Blazing Starbirth
Confirmed results:
Result: 18 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 05:18, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Astronomy#Nebulae

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 25 May 2022 at 23:40:54 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Södermanland Runic Inscription 113
  • Being the current “housekeeper” of the gallery pages, I like to add my 50 cent ;–). We usually put Adam’s excellent restaurations of old portrait photographs into the Portrait gallery page, i.e. we handle them just like contemporary photos. Per analogy this would mean that we should handle this historical photograph like a modern photograph of that runestone, because it’s a photograph (and not a painting, drawing, etc. which would go into some of the Non-photographic media galleries). So I would put the runestone photo either into the Sculptures#Other gallery or into the Other objects in landscapes gallery … depending on the disputed question whether a runestone is a sculpture or not (for me, it is ;–). --Aristeas (talk) 09:03, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    Aye, that's the problem: It's not exactly a sculpture, but it's not exactly not one. This one was atop a burial mound, so maybe it counts as a gravestone.... but does that help us at all? Adam Cuerden (talk) 09:58, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Gravestones would usually be considered a type of sculpture, I think, unless they were mere markers. Was the shape of the runestone culturally significant, and did it vary much? By the way, the reason I haven't voted is that I haven't been able to decide how to vote. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:34, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • As a Swede with some knowledge of our runestones, I'll add a few words. They are almost always erected in honor of someone. (See article Runestone) They are not grave stones, but Viking monuments. The texts on them are variations of "XX erected/carved this stone after/in memory of warrior/son/husband/battle/whatever..." The correct gallery is Monuments and memorials, where dolmens, pyramids, etc. are kept. Now fixed. --Cart (talk) 10:40, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • I think this one comes closer to grave marker than most - being believed to have sat atop a burial mound, although it all being dug up mid-19th century by farmers limits knowledge. Adam Cuerden (talk) 22:04, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • There are many memorials that sits on top of graves, serving dual purposes. From the pyramids up to modern day Tomb of the Unknown Soldier. Runestones have also been moved about and repurposed, ever since they were made. Sometimes it's hard to know their original location. For our gallery system, it's fits best in the memorial section. --Cart (talk) 22:42, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    Agreed. Also helps keep it with other runestones. Adam Cuerden (talk) 02:12, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
And to answer Ikan's question, the shape is not that significant. They are usually sort of phallic, but it seems they took a good stone with an oblong shape and one relatively flat surface and carved the runes on it. Vikings on the Swedish mainland were carvers, not stonemasons, and the stones are made from hard durable stone. Picture stones are different since the are mostly found on Gotland and made of softer limestone (the bedrock of the island), which is easier to work. They are distinctly phallic in shape. --Cart (talk) 10:54, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 7 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 05:17, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects/Sculptures#Monuments and memorials

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 29 May 2022 at 21:57:02 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

William Harvey Carney
Confirmed results:
Result: 17 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 05:17, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: People/Portrait#Men

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 29 May 2022 at 23:54:12 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 05:16, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 30 May 2022 at 06:08:25 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Azulejo panel at the hotel "The Ritz", Funchal, Madeira
Confirmed results:
Result: 14 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 14:50, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects/Architectural elements#Other

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 30 May 2022 at 11:56:30 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Flakstadpollen "fjord" in evening, Lofoten, Norway
Confirmed results:
Result: 21 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 14:49, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural/Norway#Northern Norway (Nord-Norge/Nord-Noreg)

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 26 May 2022 at 07:45:57 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Vermont State House
Confirmed results:
Result: 11 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 14:51, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Exteriors#United States

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 30 May 2022 at 17:13:07 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Song sparrow
Confirmed results:
Result: 20 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 01:00, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 1 Jun 2022 at 09:55:56 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Church of Nossa Senhora da Alegria, Furnas, São Miguel Island, Azores, Portugal
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Poco a poco (talk) 10:40, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 1 Jun 2022 at 09:53:01 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION

 I withdraw my nomination I still love this photo and I think it should be an FP, we will try again when everything is fixed and I'm sure we'll get it right in the end. But this is clearly going nowhere. Cmao20 (talk) 18:20, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--Cmao20 (talk) 18:20, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 5 Jun 2022 at 16:07:06 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Shrovetide painting, Boris Kustodiev
  • At first glance, I had the same opinion but after further investigation I came to the conclusion that in the version of this work in the Russian Museum the Pinkish theme is part of the painting. Take a look at this picture taken in 2020. -- IamMM (talk) 06:32, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • This one also looks too warm IMO, but I found this one that I think is better for judging. The faded pink color is still visible but I admit it looks exaggerated in the nominated image. -- IamMM (talk) 12:28, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 4 Jun 2022 at 09:29:23 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Buteo buteo
  •  Oppose Indeed I believe the whole background is fake. You can see it (apart from the missing portions that haven't been cloned out/replaced) in the unnatural transition from the eagle to the background Poco a poco (talk) 10:58, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Charles and Diego, you are both experienced and skilled wildlife photographers and I respect your judgment, but looking at the photographer's Flickr page I think he deserves the same attributes. I just can not understand why someone with such acceptable equipment and skills should put a fake background on the pictures. File:Buzzard - Flickr - Andy Morffew.jpg is another image of this bird, do you think there is a similar problem in it? -- IamMM (talk) 11:58, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • I'm sorry for your nom but I cannot accept this level of image manipulation (and on top without any mention of it). The image you link is also a fake, I added 2 notes, but that fake is better than this one, he put more effort there to make it look real Poco a poco (talk) 12:08, 26 May 2022 (UTC) PD: I left the author a message on Flickr.[reply]
  • The other picture has a replaced background too. Examine the sharp pixels at the transition from bird to background. Very obvious. For your interest, he has a picture of juvenile greenfinches on flickr with the very obvious addition of bright yellow. To be clear, we all post-process, but I believe there are limits to what we should do and then pretend it's original. Charlesjsharp (talk) 13:31, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Oppose Excellent detail but the fake background is really obvious. Cmao20 (talk) 10:29, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  •  I withdraw my nomination Thank you all, this was an instructive nomination. I sent a message to the photographer informing him of the possibility of his images being challenged on Commons due to unannounced manipulation. -- IamMM (talk) 07:10, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  •  CommentIt's been run through a sharpening app. Look at the eye. When I image search for buzzard eyes they are excessively round and finely detailed. This birds eyes are like, grainy and completely irregular. Something similar is on the Village Pump right now. Also around the eye, see how it has blended the beak with the feathers and the feathers with the skin? And there are one or two other possible pointers but the eye, this birds eye is almost definitely not that lumpy shape. ~ R.T.G 13:05, 11 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 3 Jun 2022 at 19:30:53 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Nanoart of Africa

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 3 Jun 2022 at 03:37:47 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Himawari-8 satellite images of the 15 January 2022 eruption of Hunga Tonga-Hunga Haʻapai.
There is a gif which is nominated as featured picture candidates Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:2004 Indonesia Tsunami Complete.gif, i can't not uploaded in original becuase mp4 is not unacceptable so i convert to mp4 to gif. HurricaneEdgar 09:55, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, gif FPs do exist, but now they are very, very, contested at FPC. A lot has happened here since 2004. You might want to take a look at this nom: Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Global Temperature Anomaly.gif, and how it developed into a video. If you go with the video format, you have to nominate it at COM:FVC since that's where videos and animation are these days. If you have a mp4 file, it can be converted to a format that works on Commons when you upload it, see Help:Converting video. --Cart (talk) 12:32, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Video alternative

[edit]

 Info @W.carter and Yann: This is now better? i convert to gif to webm. HurricaneEdgar 13:30, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, it's better, but as I said you can't nominate videos here, they branched off from this page a few years ago and are now at Commons:Featured media candidates. Please nominate it there instead. Good luck! --Cart (talk) 14:44, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Featured media candidates/File:Tonga Volcano Eruption 2022-01-15 0320Z to 0610Z Himawari-8 visible.webm HurricaneEdgar 15:02, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Thank you for nominating this image. Unfortunately, it does not fall within the Guidelines and is unlikely to succeed for the following reason: Video nominated at COM:FVC as it should be. --Cart (talk) 16:33, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply] Anyone other than the nominator who disagrees may override this template by changing {{FPX}} to {{FPX contested}} and adding a vote in support. Voting will then continue in the usual way. If not contested within 24 hours, this nomination may be closed.

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 28 May 2022 at 07:47:04 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Murga singer from Uruguay
Confirmed results:
Result: 17 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 12:40, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: People#Events

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 1 Jun 2022 at 09:52:59 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
Confirmed results:
Result: 20 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 12:42, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Food and drink#Fruits (raw)

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 1 Jun 2022 at 10:33:39 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Brown-throated sunbirds are commonly seen upland feeding with nectar
Confirmed results:
Result: 11 support, 0 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:47, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 1 Jun 2022 at 12:21:53 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

N.G.Elwert bookstore Marburg
Confirmed results:
Result: 16 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:46, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects/Architectural elements#Windows

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 1 Jun 2022 at 14:07:40 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Viperine water snake (Natrix maura) swimming
Confirmed results:
Result: 16 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 23:18, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Reptiles#Family : Colubridae (Colubrids)

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 1 Jun 2022 at 15:33:53 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Ornithogalum. Closed flower bud. Garden sanctuary JonkerValley.
Confirmed results:
Result: 16 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 23:17, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Plants/Asparagales#Family : Asparagaceae

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 2 Jun 2022 at 06:05:42 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Buller's Albatross
Confirmed results:
Result: 19 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Yann (talk) 15:13, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Birds#Family_:_Diomedeidae_(Albatross)

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 2 Jun 2022 at 06:10:02 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Lythrum salicaria
Confirmed results:
Result: 18 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Yann (talk) 15:12, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Plants#Family_:_Lythraceae

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 2 Jun 2022 at 12:14:45 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Spanish festoon (Zerynthia rumina)
Confirmed results:
Result: 17 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:02, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 4 Jun 2022 at 00:44:54 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Kenje Ogata

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 2 Jun 2022 at 21:13:29 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Northern elephant seal bull between fights
  •  Comment The feature of the image is said to be the cuts, but they are not in focus. Despite the implication from the description, these are not recent cuts, are they? Where's the blood? Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:03, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment Indeed, as a former frequent visitor to Año Nuevo, I remember much better examples of male individuals with cuts. Now, more depth of field is not going to fix that particular issue. It's more about photographing a different animal. With that being said, I would have used a narrower depth of field for this image. The way the picture is currently composed, the face of the animal is the main subject. And a narrower depth of field would have highlighted that. However, in the end it's the photographer's choice… --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 16:04, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 11 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:06, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Mammals/Carnivora#Family_:_Phocidae_(Earless_Seals)

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 3 Jun 2022 at 08:30:54 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--A.Savin 11:34, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 30 May 2022 at 00:06:34 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION

Alternative

[edit]

JPG version

  •  Info JPG version, no further changes. If the preview looks different, that's because TIF and JPG get different levels of sharpening from the Mediawiki thubnailer. --El Grafo (talk) 08:42, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
...but not to smell :-) Basile Morin (talk) 01:08, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 13 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 11:27, 30 May 2022 (UTC))[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects#Clothing and textiles
The chosen alternative is: File:Черные_чулки.jpg

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 30 May 2022 at 17:50:19 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

A child dressed up as the God Shiva
  •  Question Do you mean some posterization that's on the gray cloth in the background? Because the boy is made up, it's hard for me to tell what might be an artifact or color noise and what's just makeup. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:54, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • ✓ New version uploaded A great photo with strong FP potential. However, the technical quality is not perfect, but a challenge for image editing. The dark spots on the cloth behind the boy appear to be natural, my guess is some sort of mold stains, probably caused by storage in a moist place. The posterization, less prominent in the original, was probably caused more by my attempt to reduce some of the excessive, artificial vignetting. I have now reversed this editing step by 90 percent. As for the boy's face, there are clearly beads of sweat in addition to the heavy makeup. You can also see this in the trickle, starting at the neck. I hope the new version offers a slight technical quality improvement. Best wishes, -- Radomianin (talk) 20:05, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 13 support, 2 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:31, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: People#Events

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 4 Jun 2022 at 00:42:29 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Jasper Francis Cropsey
  •  Support You have very good arguments. Maybe it took someone who's not the son of a painter to think of that. I suspect it was just a popular photography portrait style of the day, though.-- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:21, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 11:04, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: People/Portrait#Men

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 2 Jun 2022 at 09:14:08 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  •  Oppose If such is the case, that this has gone through serious alterations or staging, it may not be fair to have it "competing in the league" with genuine photographs. I like this aesthetically, but digital art may be a topic worth discussing about, as I am one myself too, even if doing just paintings rather than "photos". I don't know what has happened, but may need a word from the creator to be clear. Genuine description needed, as I would also oppose a picture of wildlife taken in a zoo, if it isn't stated. --Ximonic (talk) 11:30, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 I withdraw my nomination concern for undocumented manipulation. Tomer T (talk) 09:01, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 4 Jun 2022 at 12:58:11 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
Confirmed results:
Result: 12 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 13:06, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Interiors/Religious_buildings/Ceilings#Austria