User talk:Krd

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Warning
If your question is why a specific file has been deleted or how it can be restored, please advise on initial contact that you have read COM:L and COM:VRT and why this doesn't answer your questions.

Questions from users who appear to have not read the mentioned two pages will not be answered.

 Warning
SpBot archives all sections tagged with {{Section resolved|1=~~~~}} after 1 day. For the archive overview, see archive.

Karten wirklich ohne Lizenzinformation?[edit]

Hallo, gestern wurde eine Vielzahl von Karten (größtenteils Gemarkungsgrenzen und Einzugsgebiete unterfränkischer Gemeinden) entfernt, was einen großen Informationsverlust darstellt. Als Grund angegeben ist "No license since 25 March 2024", was für mich jedoch nicht nachvollziehbar ist, da in der Google-Suche nach den Karten noch Lizenzinformationen zu finden sind. Ich könnte mir lediglich vorstellen, dass die Lizenzinformationen durch Vandalismus entfernt wurden. Ich bitte um Prüfung und ggf. Wiederherstellung.

Es handelt sich – sofern ich alle gefunden habe – um folgende Dateien (sorry für die lange Liste):

Vaionaut (talk) 13:19, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Die Beispiele, die ich jetzt nochmal geprüft habe, sollen alle "Eigenes Werk" und "CC-by-sa-4.0" sein. Das trifft sicher nicht zu. Krd 16:19, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Danke Krd, verzeih bitte dennoch die Nachfrage: Laut Google-Suche waren Hinweise auf die Openstreetmap hinterlegt ("This map of Fellen was created from OpenStreetMap project data, collected by the community. This map may be incomplete, and may contain errors. [...]"), z.B. bei File:Fellen 500.png oder File:Eußenheim mit Gemarkungen.png. Wo ist der Unterschied z.B. zu File:Lammersdorf Openstreetmap 110209.png? Kann die Lizenzinformation nicht korrigiert werden, wenn sie nachvollziehbar ist? Vaionaut (talk) 16:49, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Es gibt zahlreiche Beispiele, in denen nichts von OSM steht. Hast Du eine Liste der Dateien, die von OSM stammen? --Krd 16:54, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@EugeneZelenko: You tagged these as dw_no_source but some appear to be valid OpenSteetMap files. Please advise. --Krd 16:54, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
For example, license tag on File:Esselbach 500.png was {{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}} what is obviously wrong: work of other people was used, so {{Self}} claim is invalid, as well as OpenStreetMap license is different ({{CC-BY-SA 2.0}}). Sure, files could be restored, but somebody should fix licenses there. EugeneZelenko (talk) 23:41, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I have no idea who could sort all this out. Krd 04:07, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Vaionaut: Here is one example I checked: File:Aalbachtal Einzugsgebiet.jpg is derived from opentopomap.org. The file description claimed this to be the own work by the uploader (by using {{Self}}) and granted a {{Cc-by-sa-4.0}} which doesn't match {{Cc-by-sa-3.0}} used by OpenTopoMap. Neither OpenTopoMap (for the map style) nor OpenStreetMap were credited. Mass-uploading such maps without proper credit and licenses is a disaster waiting to happen. How to fix this? We could temporarily restore the whole lot but then we need a volunteer who goes through all these files within a reasonable time frame, fixes the credits and adds links to the original maps. Is anyone willing to do this? Regards, AFBorchert (talk) 21:44, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Photo of István Lajkó[edit]

Dear Krdǃ May I ask why you deleted István Lajkó's photo instead of reading the permission for the entire http://www.lajkoistvan.hu/hu/multimedia/galeria sent by uploading the photo? After a few hours, the template appeared on the image, indicating that the author's consent has been received. I do not consider it acceptable that a licensed uploaded image was deleted only because no one was able to check the permisson and approve it for 30 days. Thank youː Tösö8 (talk) 11:04, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I do not consider it acceptable that you don't provide a link to the file in question. Krd 11:06, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Dear @Krd! Just after uploading the photo, I immediately sent this statement of the photographer. He has consented to the use of all images in this gallery. If you missed the link to the specific photo, wouldn't it have been easier to ask me to add it? But here it is, please: http://www.lajkoistvan.hu/images/galleries/default/PH1_1166.jpg Would you please restore the photo on the commons? Or what should I do? Thank You: Tösö8 (talk) 13:25, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
What is the link to the deleted file at Commons? Krd 16:27, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This is, please: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:PH1_1166_Lajko.jpg Thank You. Tösö8 (talk) 16:41, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The permission in in Hungarian language and not processed yet. Image will be restored as soon as it has been processed. Krd 16:47, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank You. Tösö8 (talk) 16:59, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Images from the EDMA[edit]

Hi,

Just to let you know that I re-restored the images in the public domain coming from the EDMA book that you re-deleted (see also User_talk:Krd/archive/2024#Invalid_ticket_for_EDMA?). I also removed the permission template which is not really needed it these cases.

Cheers, VIGNERON (talk) 06:31, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. --Krd 06:37, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Checkmark This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. --Krd 06:37, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Krd&oldid=880501750"