User talk:ViseMoD

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Welcome to commons ViseMoD. What better way than starting off with a Quality Image promotion could there be? :-) --QICbot (talk) 12:16, 23 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Male mallard standing.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Wonderful image. I really love the colours of this picture. Compliments to the author.--Alessandro Zangrilli 11:57, 21 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

QI

[edit]

Для File:Searchlight_in_Mikhailovsky_Garden.jpg добавьте геокод и уточните описание. Без этого я сниму свой голос.--PereslavlFoto (talk) 22:09, 9 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Не вижу смысла в геокоде для данного снимка. Считаю, что нахождение прожектора в Михайловском парке в данном случае совершенно неважно (не знаю даже, зачем я это упомянул). Да и координат у меня всё равно нет. А под описанием вы что имеете в виду? —ViseMoD (talk) 04:57, 10 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Геокод необходим всегда, он сильно помогает, от геокода ничего не становится хуже. В Михайловском парке много прожекторов. Координаты легко найти в google map, там довольно крупный масштаб, а что они будут неточные — невелика беда! С описанием я имею в виду, что сейчас непонятно, зачем эта фотография. Почему вы решили снять прожектор? Что он подсвечивает? Есть ли какие-то справочные сведения о нём типа года установки? Или товарного названия? Или название его производителя? В общем, чем больше, тем лучше. Спасибо.--PereslavlFoto (talk) 13:03, 10 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Уточнил, как смог. —ViseMoD (talk) 15:17, 11 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Превосходно! Теперь это более чем QI. Может быть, попробуете выставить на VI?--PereslavlFoto (talk) 16:19, 11 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Спасибо! Думаю, для VI это не слишком ценный кадр. —ViseMoD (talk) 19:09, 11 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Есть более детальные прожектора этого типа, да?--PereslavlFoto (talk) 11:34, 12 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Searchlight in Mikhailovsky Garden.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Please add geocode. Добавьте геокод и побольше деталей в описание предмета. Где именно стоит прожектор?--PereslavlFoto 15:22, 9 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

О времени

[edit]

"можно потратить 5 мин, можно полчаса". Я только потому спросил, что у меня на снимок меньше сорока минут, к сожалению, не уходит. Я стараюсь, но всё равно не получается быстрее, потому что слишком уж много есть вариантов и потому что нелегко выбрать правильный :-))).--PereslavlFoto (talk) 00:00, 30 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • На мой взгляд, слова про 15% серый — это религия. В жизни бывает и светло, и темно. Вот тут белый собор, на снимке он совсем не белый. Или, скажем, фотоширота у глаза гораздо больше, чем у камеры, поэтому приходится мытьём и катаньем загонять яркое небо и тусклые стены в более тусклое небо и более яркие стены, чтобы собрать их поближе к той самой середине диапазона. Вы сами заметили, что кабы сделать собор светлее, небо бы пропало; а в реальной жизни глаза делают собор светлее, и небо не пропадает. На мой взгляд, HDR это такое мошенничество, которое позволяет нам обманывать матрицу фотоаппарата.
  • Пример белого неба и белой стены, когда нужная яркость стены убивала небо.
  • Пример чёрного неба и белой стены, когда при нужной яркости стен выгорает свет фонарей, то есть типичный образец кадра, который не умещается в фотошироту.
  • Пример белой стены в яркий летний день, когда притемнение белой стены приводит к тому, что зелёные деревья становятся чёрными, да и тень вся гибнет.
  • Мне хочется оправдать эту технологию, чтобы вы не так горько думали о полезном HDR. Он реально помогает. Подробнее о технологии вот тут.
  • И ещё пару слов. Пример вечернего кадра, который по мере сил очищен от оранжевого света, и исходный вечерний ужас, который многим нравится, а я считаю его враньём. Башня не оранжевая. Башня белая.--PereslavlFoto (talk) 00:11, 30 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
    • Спасибо за примеры!
      Дело в том, что обработка фотографии - это всегда компромисс. Да, при съёмке необходимо уместить тональный диапазон сцены в диапазон фотокамеры. Однако такие приёмы, как HDR не для меня. Мне эти снимки кажутся неестественными. Вообще-то говоря, глаз не настолько лучше фотокамеры в плане тонального диапазона. Да, динамический диапазон глаза выше, но когда он фокусируется на одном объекте и не двигается, диапазон сужается. И исходя из этого, нет смысла пытаться уместить в кадр, скажем и белые облака, и траву в тени. Если нельзя снять сцену из-за большого контраста, то можно прийти в другое время, дождаться облачной погоды, либо воспользоваться градиентными фильтрами, если сцена позволяет. Однако в конечном счёте, когда приходит время обрабатывать кадр нужно не наврать с цветами и добиться максимальной контрастности у сюжетно-важного объекта.
      Если возвращаться к снимку с собором, то этими принципами я и руководствовался, когда обрабатывал кадр. В принципе, можно было бы осветлить стены, но тогда небо выбилось бы напрочь. С одной стороны, оно здесь и не важно; с другой - снимок становится неправдоподобным, что немаловажно.—ViseMoD (talk) 18:29, 30 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
      • Рецензенты на QI думают, что надо умещать и облака и траву. Такая вот объективная реальность. Что же до правдоподобности, то стены в жизни белые, а в снимке они не белые.--PereslavlFoto (talk) 06:47, 1 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Loves Monuments 2011 has finished

[edit]
Logo Wiki Loves Monuments 2011 català | dansk | Deutsch | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | français | galego | magyar | Lëtzebuergesch | norsk bokmål | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | polski | português | română | русский | svenska | +/−
Dear ViseMoD,

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments and sharing your pictures with the whole world. You are very welcome to keep uploading images, even though you can't win prizes any longer. To get started on editing relevant Wikipedia articles, click here for more information and help.
You can find all uploaded pictures in our central media collection Wikimedia Commons. Many photos are already used in Wikipedia. The contest was very successful with more than 165,000 images submitted throughout Europe. To make future contests even more successful, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in this survey.

Kind regards,

the Wiki Loves Monuments team
Map of participating countries of Wiki Loves Monuments 2011
Message delivered by Lucia Bot in 01:27, 17 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Though the collection of images for the contest has been completed (as we informed you previously), the organizers of the contest "Wikipedia loves Petersburg" are glad to update you on the current course of events.

Our jury is working hard; on November, 1 it will declare the winners and the recipients of special prizes. We ask those of you who have not yet set up an e-mail address to do it at user preferences page so that the jury could contact the participants of the contest and to hand out the awards. The winners of the European-wide Wiki Loves Monuments competition will be announced later, in mid-November.

Already on November 2 in St. Petersburg, the Art-hotel "Rachmaninov", located on 5, Kazanskaya St., will open an exhibition of works by the participants of the contest. We inform you about the opening time via the website http://wikilovesmonuments.ru/

If you have any questions or need help with Wikimedia Commons, you can contact user kaganer. You can ask any questions about the contest by sending an e-mail to info@wikimedia.ru

Thank you again for your participation!.

Размещено автоматически; РобоСтася (talk) 13:16, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

"Wikipedia loves Petersburg" contest results are summed up

[edit]

On November, 1 the winners of the contest "Wiki Loves Monuments" were announced.

It was difficult to select the winners. More than 450 users participated in the contest, having uploaded more than 4400 photographs. The Organizing Committee thanks everybody who took part, tried their hands, and agreed to make their work available to the whole world. There is fascinating work ahead of Wikipedia users: To employ the images to illustrate the articles in Wikipedia, the free encyclopaedia which is available in 270 languages.

Do not get upset if you have not won. Look into Wikipedia articles - you may soon find your work there, to help people to visualise the buildings you have taken photographs of. Besides, we will contact you to hand you in a souvenir to recognize your particiation. We hope you will accept this sign of our gratitude.

If you have a chance, you can visit the exhibition of photographs, which has been organized in Saint Petersburg and shows some of the photographs submitted to the contest.

We hope you will participate in the future competitions planned by Wikimedia RU and thank you for your contribution.

You can ask any questions about the contest by sending an e-mail to info@wikimedia.ru.

Sincerely,
In the name of the Organizing Committee,
Lvova Anastasia.

Размещено автоматически ботом РобоСтася (talk) 08:29, 2 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Petrovac's Bay.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 21:44, 17 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Harbour of Limenas - Large.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, nice mood and sharp image. --NorbertNagel 21:10, 21 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Picture of the Year voting round 1 open

[edit]

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2012 Picture of the Year competition is now open. We're interested in your opinion as to which images qualify to be the Picture of the Year for 2012. Voting is open to established Wikimedia users who meet the following criteria:

  1. Users must have an account, at any Wikimedia project, which was registered before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC].
  2. This user account must have more than 75 edits on any single Wikimedia project before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC]. Please check your account eligibility at the POTY 2012 Contest Eligibility tool.
  3. Users must vote with an account meeting the above requirements either on Commons or another SUL-related Wikimedia project (for other Wikimedia projects, the account must be attached to the user's Commons account through SUL).

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. From professional animal and plant shots to breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historically relevant images, images portraying the world's best architecture, maps, emblems, diagrams created with the most modern technology, and impressive human portraits, Commons features pictures of all flavors.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topic categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you can vote for as many images as you like. The first round category winners and the top ten overall will then make it to the final. In the final round, when a limited number of images are left, you must decide on the one image that you want to become the Picture of the Year.

To see the candidate images just go to the POTY 2012 page on Wikimedia Commons

Wikimedia Commons celebrates our featured images of 2012 with this contest. Your votes decide the Picture of the Year, so remember to vote in the first round by January 30, 2013.

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee


Delivered by Orbot1 (talk) at 10:33, 19 January 2013 (UTC) - you are receiving this message because you voted last year[reply]

Picture of the Year 2013 R1 Announcement

[edit]

Picture of the Year 2013 R2 Announcement

[edit]

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2013 is open!

[edit]
2012 Picture of the Year: A pair of European Bee-eaters in Ariège, France.

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2013 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2013) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. The top 30 overall and the most popular image in each category have continued to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just one image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 2 will end on 7 March 2014. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:MyLanguage/Commons:Picture_of_the_Year/2013/Introduction/en Click here to learn more and vote »]

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

This Picture of the Year vote notification was delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:22, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Picture of the Year 2013 Results Announcement

[edit]

Picture of the Year 2013 Results

[edit]
The 2013 Picture of the Year. View all results »

Dear ViseMoD,

The 2013 Picture of the Year competition has ended and we are pleased to announce the results: We shattered participation records this year — more people voted in Picture of the Year 2013 than ever before. In both rounds, 4070 different people voted for their favorite images. Additionally, there were more image candidates (featured pictures) in the contest than ever before (962 images total).

  • In the first round, 2852 people voted for all 962 files
  • In the second round, 2919 people voted for the 50 finalists (the top 30 overall and top 2 in each category)

We congratulate the winners of the contest and thank them for creating these beautiful images and sharing them as freely licensed content:

  1. 157 people voted for the winner, an image of a lightbulb with the tungsten filament smoking and burning.
  2. In second place, 155 people voted for an image of "Sviati Hory" (Holy Mountains) National Park in Donetsk Oblast, Ukraine.
  3. In third place, 131 people voted for an image of a swallow flying and drinking.

Click here to view the top images »

We also sincerely thank to all 4070 voters for participating and we hope you will return for next year's contest in early 2015. We invite you to continue to participate in the Commons community by sharing your work.

Thanks,
the Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:59, 26 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Andrey Korzun (talk) 10:11, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sestroretsk Marsh - Shore.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 19:25, 23 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tower Bridge Pano.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 15:57, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

New Category for you

[edit]

I made a new category for you, Category:Quality images by ViseMoD, like most of the others, which participate in the QI-Contest. It will be easier now to organize your own Quality images. Always good light! --Hubertl (talk) 10:57, 5 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! --ViseMoD (talk) 21:22, 5 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Озеро Городищенское.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:00, 5 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Petrovsky Pond - Panoramic.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 15:34, 16 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! West Kotlin Shore South - Panoramic.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 04:11, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 19 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Yuntolovsky Reserve - Panoramic West.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 08:48, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Shhuchie lake - Panoramic North.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --C messier 08:20, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! North Shore of Neva Gulf - Autumn Path.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments 4 MPix out of a 16 MPix camera for a landscape shot is too low resolution. Can you please provide a higher resolution? --Cccefalon 10:22, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done --Cccefalon 06:03, 30 October 2015 (UTC)✓ Done[reply]
Higher resolution is uploaded. --ViseMoD 10:30, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you. Good quality. --Cccefalon 05:07, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lindulovskaja grove - River Bend.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Please provide a higher resolution. 3 MPix out of a 16 MPix camera for an easy to take motif is not acceptable. --Cccefalon 20:47, 6 May 2016 (UTC) Btw it is not Saint Petersburg --A.Savin 13:10, 7 May 2016 (UTC)  Comment Higher resolution version is uploaded. --ViseMoD 19:09, 7 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Now the motif looks really great. Please remove the magenta CA top right; I will support after that. --Cccefalon 10:45, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@Cccefalon:  Comment This is done as well --ViseMoD 13:17, 15 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
ok now --Cccefalon 09:29, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 23 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Вики любит Землю 2016

[edit]
noframe
noframe

Здравствуйте! Спасибо за участие в российской части конкурса Вики любит Землю 2016! Сообщаем, что Ваша фотография:

вошла в лонг-лист конкурса. В ближайшие дни жюри составит шорт-лист и определит победителей, обращая особое внимание на качество изображений. Пожалуйста, проверьте, что вошедшие в лонг-лист фотографии загружены в максимально возможном разрешении – это необходимое условие для победы в конкурсе.

Также убедитесь в том, что Вы указали адрес электронной почты и разрешили приём писем от других участников – без этого мы не сможем с Вами связаться.

Кроме того, Вы можете сделать так, чтобы Ваши фотографии увидели читатели Википедии. Найдите подходящую статью о природном объекте, городе или регионе и добавьте туда свои фотографии. Вы также можете проиллюстрировать путеводители Викигида.

Ещё раз спасибо за интерес к конкурсу и российским природным объектам!

Организаторы российской части Вики любит Землю 2016

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lower Multinskoe - Towards South.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments - Good quality for me. -- Ikan Kekek 11:16, 2 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:41, 5 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Middle Multinskoe - Panoramic.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 18:46, 8 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 11 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey

[edit]
  1. This survey is primarily meant to get feedback on the Wikimedia Foundation's current work, not long-term strategy.
  2. Legal stuff: No purchase necessary. Must be the age of majority to participate. Sponsored by the Wikimedia Foundation located at 149 New Montgomery, San Francisco, CA, USA, 94105. Ends January 31, 2017. Void where prohibited. Click here for contest rules.

Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey

[edit]

(Sorry to write in Engilsh)

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lake Akchan - Panoramic.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:12, 16 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! North Shore of Neva Gulf - Blossom.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 11:57, 16 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! North Shore of Neva Gulf - Spring Panoramic.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good Quality --PtrQs 12:11, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Baltra Island - Wind Turbines.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Could you add some wind turbine-related category, please? --Basotxerri 19:17, 10 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Done. --ViseMoD 07:19, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Good quality. --Basotxerri 14:38, 11 March 2018 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 14 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kemer - Panorama.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Nice dawn mood --Daniel Case 17:18, 8 July 2018 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 11 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lloret de Mar - Panorama of main beach.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 00:21, 14 January 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 16 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion

[edit]
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Овцебыки - самые грозные млекопитающие Таймыра.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Овцебыки - самые грозные млекопитающие Таймыра.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Toledo Infantry Academy - Panoramic.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support
Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 04:18, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 25 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Panorama of The Castell de Sant Joan de Lloret de Mar.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:00, 27 July 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Loves Earth 2020 in Russia is open!

[edit]

Здравствуйте! с 1 по 30 июня проходит российская часть международного фотоконкурса "Вики любит Землю". Приглашаем вас принять участие в конкурсе, чтобы помочь нам лучше проиллюстрировать вики-статьи, пополнить крупнейшую в стране коллекцию изображений российских природных объектов и побороться за призы.

С правилами конкурса и списком охраняемых природных территорий России можно ознакомиться здесь. Мы также будем рады ответить на ваши вопросы.

С уважением,
организаторы конкурса. 14:56, 10 June 2020 (UTC)

(Вы получили это сообщение, поскольку участвовали в предыдущих конкурсах "Вики любит Землю")

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chugush Range - Sochi National Park - 2021.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 14:36, 18 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Volch'ja River - Värämänselkä Ridge - 2020.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Looks like a painting. Good quality. --Steindy 16:06, 20 June 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 23 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ice Hummocks near Listvyanka.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 17:10, 26 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment Could use additional relevant categories (relating to the ice and the mountains in the distance, for example). Possible FP? -- Ikan Kekek 03:59, 27 June 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 29 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mys Drakon (ostrov Ogoy) - winter 2022.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Romainbehar 07:15, 10 July 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 13 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]