Commons:Featured picture candidates/Log/September 2019

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 1 Sep 2019 at 01:49:03 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Cream and red coffee cup-shaped balconies in Tokyo
Confirmed results:
Result: 9 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Cart (talk) 09:28, 1 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture#Japan

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 3 Sep 2019 at 04:02:21 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Wayside cross and stack of firewood in the forest of Bulain Gröden

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 1 Sep 2019 at 10:19:17 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

The Müller organ in the Grote Kerk, Haarlem in the Netherlands
Confirmed results:
Result: 14 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 13:26, 1 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects#Musical instruments

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 5 Sep 2019 at 18:32:04 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

African red-eyed bulbul (pycnonotus nigricans)
Confirmed results:
Result: 12 support, 0 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 00:56, 2 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family_:_Pycnonotidae_(Bulbuls)

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 1 Sep 2019 at 20:43:35 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

View from VysotSky panorama point
Confirmed results:
Result: 16 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 00:54, 2 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Cityscapes#Russia

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 5 Sep 2019 at 17:19:07 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Hot air balloons at the 49th Montgolfiade in Münster (1st race), North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany
Confirmed results:
Result: 13 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 00:55, 2 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects/Vehicles/Air_transport#Aerostats

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 10 Sep 2019 at 01:48:02 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Western Gorilla (Gorilla gorilla) skull

 I withdraw my nomination Thanks for informing me--Boothsift 17:21, 1 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 9 Sep 2019 at 21:38:31 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Harrah's Casino, New Orlens

* Support -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:38, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 9 Sep 2019 at 02:28:02 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Aztec Sandstone in the Valley of Fire, Nevada, USA.
Yeah, you're probably right. I guess I'll just have to come back and retake it :-)

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 6 Sep 2019 at 23:35:42 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 6 Sep 2019 at 00:43:53 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Pantala flavescens (globe_skimmer) male, in flight
Confirmed results:
Result: 24 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Cart (talk) 10:35, 2 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Arthropods/Odonata#Family_:_Libellulidae_(Skimmers)

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 1 Sep 2019 at 23:18:12 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Swallow Prominent on a grey wall
  • To clarify, it is sitting on the wall of a medium-sized, gray-painted wooden house next to a forest. It's as far from an industrial environment as you can get, but you are of course entitled to your opinion. --Cart (talk) 22:38, 24 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Thanks for the info Charles, I didn't know that. Well, it makes sense they would seek out places to rest where they are a little less visible for predators, I guess. I'm happy to learn the moth is in a place it likes. --Cart (talk) 09:25, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Support IMHO this “Shades of Grey” ;–) image has got a special kind of aesthetics; the absence of vivid colours emphasizes the structure, like in a Grisaille painting. --Aristeas (talk) 15:34, 24 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Support Now we are talking... Poco2 18:05, 24 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Weak support The specimen is beautiful. I've never focus-stacked myself, but I guess it's quite a bit surplus work. You can see the singular bristles and scales on the wall - which, I think, is not really focused, as well as the front legs. It drags my eyes... But I guess it just couldn't have been done better. --GeXeS (talk) 21:12, 24 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • GeXeS, I have to be totally honest and say that: Yes, it can be done better, if you have a DSLR (perhaps full-frame) and a marco lens, which I don't. I'm just happy it came out as good as it did. --Cart (talk) 21:24, 24 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Not that much I can do since the white scales seem to be oriented directly at the sun in that area, with almost no shadows in between them. I have managed to retrieve some info from a few layers the stacking program hadn't used and patched it in now. --Cart (talk) 22:27, 24 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 16 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 10:40, 2 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera#Familia: Notodontidae

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 2 Sep 2019 at 14:11:07 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Hot air balloons at the 49th Montgolfiade in Münster (1st race), North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany
Confirmed results:
Result: 9 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--Cart (talk) 15:19, 2 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 6 Sep 2019 at 06:56:45 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Centre of a opium poppy blossom. Stacked from 23 frames.
Confirmed results:
Result: 18 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Cart (talk) 13:44, 2 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Plants#Family : Papaveraceae

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 2 Sep 2019 at 17:33:59 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Stena Jutlandica
Confirmed results:
Result: 13 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 23:26, 2 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects/Vehicles/Water transport

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 6 Sep 2019 at 22:53:35 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Cygnus Wall
Confirmed results:
Result: 13 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 09:36, 3 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Astronomy#Nebulae

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 12 Sep 2019 at 14:35:38 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Vitascope
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--A.Savin 18:44, 3 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 11 Sep 2019 at 20:08:51 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Blond child with blue eyes
Thank you for nominating this image. Unfortunately, it does not fall within the Guidelines and is unlikely to succeed for the following reason: Very poor quality JPG. Overcompressed. -- Colin (talk) 16:58, 3 September 2019 (UTC)[reply] Anyone other than the nominator who disagrees may override this template by changing {{FPX}} to {{FPX contested}} and adding a vote in support. Voting will then continue in the usual way. If not contested within 24 hours, this nomination may be closed.
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--A.Savin 18:40, 3 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 8 Sep 2019 at 07:22:16 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Onésime Reclus, a French geographer

 I withdraw my nomination Yann (talk) 20:07, 2 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--A.Savin 18:43, 3 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 7 Sep 2019 at 09:53:04 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

White-backed vulture (Gyps africanus) in Kruger National Park, South Africa
 Comment Well, the remaining noise is hard to avoide with a bridge camera. I was looking for FPs of Gyps africana. The only other one is IMO less worthy of FP. --Axel Tschentscher (talk) 11:25, 29 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
More likely bad camera settings or post-processing. It's the same camera I use and this is way more noise than I usually get. --Cart (talk) 12:08, 29 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--A.Savin 18:39, 3 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 7 Sep 2019 at 07:49:42 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

The first DSCOVR EPIC image, released by NASA on July 6, 2015, shows the full sunlit Earth from 916,651 mi (1,475,207 km) away, centered on the Americas.
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 7 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--A.Savin 18:36, 3 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Neon.JPG (delist), not delisted

[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 3 Sep 2019 at 10:54:10
Neon sign

Result: 1 delist, 7 keep, 0 neutral => not delisted. --A.Savin 18:32, 3 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 7 Sep 2019 at 06:28:12 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Queen Lili'uokalani of the Hawaiian Kingdom
Confirmed results:
Result: 15 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 18:34, 3 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: People#Sitting people

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 7 Sep 2019 at 09:33:59 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
@W.carter and Charlesjsharp: ✓ Done Reprocessed please have a look.--Bijay chaurasia (talk) 17:35, 29 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Charlesjsharp: Hills are ok. 100% organic  :)--Bijay chaurasia (talk) 05:38, 30 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

(UTC)

Confirmed results:
Result: 13 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 18:35, 3 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural#Nepal

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 7 Sep 2019 at 17:55:52 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Winter on the Misleburg in the Rhoen Mountains
Confirmed results:
Result: 19 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 18:38, 3 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural/Germany

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 7 Sep 2019 at 20:26:15 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Torlesse Range from Mt Torlesse, New Zealand
  • Both shots were taken 2 hours away. Same light, same mountains. I'm saying this because I've immediately had an impression of dejà vu. "I'll withdraw if it is" No, wait: I've not opposed yet -- Basile Morin (talk) 05:47, 30 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • I mean I'm happy to withdraw if folks here think it's too similar. I guess I haven't participated at FPC long enough to develop the sense on what's too similar and what is still acceptable. --Podzemnik (talk) 07:14, 30 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • @Basile Morin Sure, I always welcome any opinion. I was thinking that maybe we can mention somewhere at COM:FP that similar pictures should't be nominated and link some cases where pictures were declined at FPC for too much similaritiy and when it was acceptable. --Podzemnik (talk) 18:54, 30 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 15 support, 0 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /--Cart (talk) 21:16, 3 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural/New Zealand

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 3 Sep 2019 at 14:13:26 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Tower of Hercules, A Coruña, Galicia, Spain.
Confirmed results:
Result: 16 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Cart (talk) 21:17, 3 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Towers

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 10 Sep 2019 at 15:36:06 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Distant view of Corniglia and Manarola from the Azure Trail, Cinque Terre, Italy.
Thanks for the comments. I was going to fix the dark seam, but all I see are some darker clouds, perhaps you could leave a note? --The Cosmonaut (talk) 14:22, 2 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 6 Sep 2019 at 17:36:21 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Hydrangea arborescens Annabelle over a fence
  • Kreuz, thanks for your keen eye, I had missed that and you bring up a bothering subject. Sharpening noise is more visible on Commons' interface since it tends to add a bit more sharpening/contrast to photos (more prominent at thumb size). I've discussed this with another photographer and we have compared how photos are displayed on Commons vs Flickr (less extra sharpening) or Photosop and Lightroom. It is rather difficult to get some photos to look good on all sites as well as on your own computer. Anyway, I have reverted the smart sharpening on the left ball and it looks much better. Thanks! --Cart (talk) 10:28, 29 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
"this perspective and old painted fence, brings me back to being a kid in my grandmother's garden,"
We had a hedge back home in the suburbs / Over which I never could see
"... lying on the grass looking up at the white balls and imagining they were fluffy clouds in the sky."
What were the skies like when you were young?
Daniel Case (talk) 01:15, 1 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
A truly poetic vote. Thanks Daniel. --Cart (talk) 09:25, 1 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 8 Sep 2019 at 07:13:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Sameksha Singh, Bollywood actress
  •  Question I was wondering: AtticDeveloper77 has no user page and the contribs list a number of deletion requests/rights claims against user Beeblebrox. Is this legit now? Do we have the real creator here? --Axel (talk) 17:20, 30 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 I withdraw my nomination Yann (talk) 04:43, 4 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 8 Sep 2019 at 01:21:27 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

A building of Taktsang Palphug Monastery, Bhutan

 I withdraw my nomination Thank you--Boothsift 02:51, 4 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 4 Sep 2019 at 06:37:27 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Red-Crested Korhaan (lophotis ruficrista) near Okaukuejo in Etosha National Park, Namibia
 Question Certainly the better mug shot, but no pattern view and head crest view possible with ruffled feathers from the side perspective. Tight crop bottom to avoid dominant gravel shadow and left to allow facing into two-thirds. Also: how about sharpening artefacts around feather contours? --Axel Tschentscher (talk) 09:32, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 3 support, 5 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /--Cart (talk) 08:37, 4 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 4 Sep 2019 at 05:12:03 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Nunnery Erlenbad, southeast facade, Sasbach, Germany
Confirmed results:
Result: 11 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Cart (talk) 08:35, 4 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Religious buildings

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 8 Sep 2019 at 04:25:35 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Children in a boat on the Shari-Goyain River in Ratargul Swamp Forest, Bangladesh.
Confirmed results:
Result: 22 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Cart (talk) 08:33, 4 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: People#Sitting_people

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 4 Sep 2019 at 12:33:16 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Petra Klinger, 2018 world climbing championships Innsbruck, combined finals
Confirmed results:
Result: 11 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Cart (talk) 13:27, 4 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Sports#Individual_Sports

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 8 Sep 2019 at 10:26:17 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Crested serpent eagle
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 6 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--Cart (talk) 13:28, 4 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 4 Sep 2019 at 11:10:56 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

A 3D Appolonian gasket (more infos in the file description)
Confirmed results:
Result: 3 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--Cart (talk) 13:29, 4 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 8 Sep 2019 at 15:21:46 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

African emerald cuckoo (Chrysococcyx cupreus) male, Kakum National park, Ghana
Confirmed results:
Result: 16 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 00:00, 5 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Birds#Family_:_Cuculidae_(Cuckoos)

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 8 Sep 2019 at 14:37:09 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
Confirmed results:
Result: 25 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 23:59, 4 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects/Vehicles/Land vehicles

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 4 Sep 2019 at 15:16:18 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION

Alternative

[edit]

Thank you for your comment. You mean like this--Famberhorst (talk) 16:53, 29 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 2 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 23:54, 4 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 4 Sep 2019 at 14:20:41

Result: 7 delist, 0 keep, 0 neutral => delisted and replaced. --A.Savin 08:10, 5 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 4 Sep 2019 at 21:07:02 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Black redstart, female, in the park of Seehof Castle near Bamberg
Confirmed results:
Result: 18 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Cart (talk) 07:36, 5 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 5 Sep 2019 at 06:51:27 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Pier by Sabine Hut, Nelson Lakes National Park, New Zealand

16:9 alternative

[edit]

Pier by Sabine Hut 16-9, Nelson Lakes National Park

Confirmed results:
Result: 18 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Basile Morin (talk) 00:53, 6 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places#New_Zealand

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 5 Sep 2019 at 12:54:56 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Pacific Golden Plover (Pluvialis fulva), Boat Harbour, New South Wales, Australia
Sorry for the category error; thanks for fixing it. --Axel Tschentscher (talk) 17:51, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Well, the location and coordinates were in the description if not in categories. All fixed up now at least. (This too should have been made before nominating it, You'll get it right next time. ;-) ) --Cart (talk) 18:27, 29 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 16 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 00:57, 6 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Birds/Charadriiformes#Family_:_Charadriidae_(Plovers)

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 5 Sep 2019 at 12:25:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Równia pod Śnieżką, Krkonoše mountains - hiking signs
Confirmed results:
Result: 12 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 00:56, 6 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 9 Sep 2019 at 08:59:39 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Sapphire-throated hummingbird (Lepidopyga coeruleogularis coeruleogularis) male in Panama
Confirmed results:
Result: 18 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 00:58, 6 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Birds#Family : Trochilidae (Hummingbirds)

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 5 Sep 2019 at 08:13:11 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
I hope you will see less dirty, shed and more significant images from Nepal.--Bijay chaurasia (talk) 17:36, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 6 support, 6 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 00:54, 6 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 8 Sep 2019 at 23:31:59 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Pedestrian street in Stockholm

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 10 Sep 2019 at 01:45:49 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Sitting Asian elephant bathing in river
Confirmed results:
Result: 16 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 07:42, 6 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Mammals#Order : Proboscidea (Elephants)

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 14 Sep 2019 at 17:31:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Poggiorsini dale in Alta Murgia National Park
Nomination denied. Thank you for nominating this image. Unfortunately, it does not fall within the Guidelines because only two active nominations per user are allowed. Feel free to nominate it later after one of the other noms is closed or withdrawn.--Cart (talk) 17:40, 5 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 16 Sep 2019 at 01:58:26 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Footbridge over a pond in Shinjuku Gyoen National Garden and NTT DoCoMo Yoyogi Building, Tokyo
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--Basile Morin (talk) 02:14, 7 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 10 Sep 2019 at 18:59:32 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

View of City Hall of Stockholm
✓ Done thanks W.carter Ezarateesteban 19:15, 1 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I wrote after the nom was over. If it becomes an FP this name change during the nom will mess up the codes. Oh well, I'll keep an eye on it and fix things if it becomes successful. Just keep it in mind till the next time. --Cart (talk) 19:34, 1 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 6 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 01:32, 7 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 12 Sep 2019 at 13:37:36 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Boston City Hall in 2019

 I withdraw my nomination --Pine (✉) 01:26, 6 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 12 Sep 2019 at 13:50:29 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Canoe launch site on the Charles River at Elm Bank in Wellesley, Massachusetts

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 11 Sep 2019 at 04:34:10 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
Confirmed results:
Result: 17 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 05:12, 7 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 6 Sep 2019 at 22:50:07 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

A view of the interior of St Botolph's Aldgate from the gallery
Confirmed results:
Result: 14 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 05:11, 7 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Interiors/Religious_buildings#United Kingdom

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 11 Sep 2019 at 01:48:01 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

View of Tad Lo river from above, with temporary footbridge and goats, Laos
Fixed You have good eyes, Podzemnik! Thanks -- Basile Morin (talk) 09:09, 2 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 14 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 06:26, 7 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural#Laos

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 13 Sep 2019 at 16:58:25 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Zion National Park, Springdale
Thank you for nominating this image. Unfortunately, it does not fall within the Guidelines and is unlikely to succeed for the following reason: Way overcooked. -- Colin (talk) 11:51, 5 September 2019 (UTC)[reply] Anyone other than the nominator who disagrees may override this template by changing {{FPX}} to {{FPX contested}} and adding a vote in support. Voting will then continue in the usual way. If not contested within 24 hours, this nomination may be closed.

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 11 Sep 2019 at 05:11:00 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Crocodylus porosus Schneider, 1801, Saltwater crocodile, female; Wilhelma, Stuttgart
Confirmed results:
Result: 22 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Cart (talk) 13:06, 7 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Reptiles

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 11 Sep 2019 at 10:27:21 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Tree with red apples in Barkedal
  • Tnx! I can't take credit for the crop, that was Colin's idea, which again shows that it is always good to have another pair of eyes on your photos. The full photo is in the file history, should anyone want it. --Cart (talk) 09:01, 3 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 18 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 20:54, 7 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Plants#Family : Rosaceae

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 11 Sep 2019 at 12:06:07 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Cave Yurievskaya, Tatarstan, Russia
Confirmed results:
Result: 21 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Cart (talk) 13:08, 7 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural/Russia#Volga Federal District

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 7 Sep 2019 at 19:51:36 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

A plush toys shop in Mexico City.
Confirmed results:
Result: 7 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--Cart (talk) 21:08, 7 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 11 Sep 2019 at 23:58:50 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Billie Eilish performing live at The Hi Hat in Highland Park, Los Angeles, California, on Thursday, August 10, 2017.
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 7 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--Cart (talk) 10:00, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 8 Sep 2019 at 10:31:36 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Monkey and Child
  • If a photo is imported from another site or has another original name (given by the author) which it is know under on other sites, it is courteous to the author, and practical for online identification, keep it in some form when renaming the file to comply with Commons naming policy. This can of course be disregarded if the original name is highly offensive. In this case I figured we could keep the original like this when I renamed it, but it can be altered if you think it's better. --Cart (talk) 14:04, 30 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • I see what you mean about the file name, but that doesn't concern me so much as the comments on the image page. 'Nature always belongs to those who nurture, care and protect it. But the humans have forcefully claimed it theirs and are on a path of destruction: destroying jungles, waterways and evicting the rightful owners, the wild animals.' Of course it's a perfectly respectable position to hold, but I think the place for these comments is on one's personal website or blog or on a social media site, not on Commons. Cmao20 (talk) 16:19, 30 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • As long as it is quite clear (which it is) that the comment is strictly the author's and not the Wiki-project's, I think it's ok to keep it if it's not offensive. Photographers always have things to say about their photos, and when they become noted, we even quote them in articles. --Cart (talk) 17:53, 30 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 10 support, 6 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--Cart (talk) 11:13, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 12 Sep 2019 at 20:17:47 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

A hay bale in the Crete dell'Orcia Nature Reserve, Tuscany, Italy
Confirmed results:
Result: 22 support, 0 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 21:29, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places#Italy

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 8 Sep 2019 at 15:30:53 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
✓ Done. Small correction. Thanks for your reviews.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 05:03, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done. Small correction. Thanks for your reviews.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 05:03, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 15 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 21:27, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects#Other objects in landscapes

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 9 Sep 2019 at 01:56:32 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Calotes calotes
Confirmed results:
Result: 3 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--Cart (talk) 09:54, 9 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 9 Sep 2019 at 05:36:27 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
Confirmed results:
Result: 3 support, 6 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /--Cart (talk) 09:56, 9 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 9 Sep 2019 at 09:25:09 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Koala (Phascolarctos cinereus) in Zoo Duisburg, Germany
FP category fixed as far as it works since we don't have any FPs in the 'Familia : Phascolarctidae' yet. --Cart (talk) 10:09, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 21 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Cart (talk) 10:03, 9 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Mammals#Order : Diprotodontia (Diprotodonts)

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 9 Sep 2019 at 07:23:00 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Crustose lichen (Rhizocarpon geographicum) on porphyr rocks on the alpine pasture Resciesa in Gherdëina, South Tyrol - Unesco World Heritage Dolomites, Puez-Geisler Nature Park.
Confirmed results:
Result: 23 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Cart (talk) 09:57, 9 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Fungi#Familia : Rhizocarpaceae

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 9 Sep 2019 at 08:49:20 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Rose chafers (Cetonia aurata) on thistle (Carduus sp.) in Hungary
Confirmed results:
Result: 9 support, 3 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /--Cart (talk) 10:00, 9 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Arthropods#Family : Scarabaeidae (Scarab Beetles)

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 13 Sep 2019 at 10:41:38 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

View from Mt Oxford, Oxford Forest Conservation Area, Canterbury, New Zealand

* Neutral - I really like to see the whole panoramic view from this mountain. Why are we fed off with a clipping? --Milseburg (talk) 12:19, 5 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • Selecting a part of a view hinges on composition of a photo while 360 panos are more about complete photographic documentation. Two different kinds of photography, both appreciated here on FPC since they can be used as illustrations in different ways. --Cart (talk) 12:36, 5 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Of course and rightly much appreciated. But I think if it succeeds, the whole view would be more appreciated then just a section. I do not understand the choice of the right and left limits here even after reading title and description. Then there is the user-friendliness: If desired, each user can only use the section of a full panoramic view. Conversely, that does not work. --Milseburg (talk) 15:23, 5 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • I guess it comes down to what kind of photos you like taking and are comfortable doing. I've tried 360 panos, but they never come out well since the sun always gets in the way, at least up here in the north where the sun isn't that high in the sky. --Cart (talk) 16:11, 5 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • The theme of that panorama are the Hochkalter mountains, it shows the Hochkalter mountains and it´s used in de:Hochkaltergebirge and also now in en:Hochkalter Mountains. If I had called it "View from Prünzlkopf" , I had presented like this. I am sure you are presenting the filet piece of the view here and it is very good and you had good conditions. I am far from opposing. But my enthusiasm is limited this time by the left and right margins. I would like to encourage you to try a 360 panorama the next time if you want to show the "view" of any mountain, while such a good seeing. It would be worthwhile. --Milseburg (talk) 10:13, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • @Milseburg So if the file was named "View north-west from Mt Oxford towards Southern Alps", that would be alright for you? That's what's written in the description. Sorry but I'm not a fun of 360 panoramas. I find them quite hard to use and they just display what you can see from the top. With 360, I'm often missing some kind of composition, or naturally set borders of the frame. I mean, your 360 panoramas are great, it's just no my thing :) By the way, if you really want to know how the pano would continue, you can check this image - there was a bushfire that day. --Podzemnik (talk) 10:29, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Another name would let me miss the continuation on the right and left side as well. Colin does not like these resulting letter-boxformats either, but my eyes and my head seem so constrained to me when the view looks promising like yours and ends so abruptly. The question of what one sees from the summit is by no means trivial. It drives people to the mountains and I find it worthwhile to show it all. That is also the original meaning of the word "panorama". Okay, the bushfire would have disturbed my enjoyment of the view that day and spoiled a 360 panorama. Convinced, a section is the better choice here. So I vote  Support now. I hope the fire was not deliberately laid and is now cleared. --Milseburg (talk) 11:27, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 18 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /FPCBot (talk) 13:05, 9 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural/New Zealand

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 9 Sep 2019 at 20:21:16 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
Confirmed results:
Result: 14 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Cart (talk) 21:43, 9 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural#Nepal

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 13 Sep 2019 at 15:05:18 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Arènes de Nîmes, Gard, France
Confirmed results:
Result: 11 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Cart (talk) 21:41, 9 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture#France

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 9 Sep 2019 at 17:52:25 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Lawachara National Park during winter.
Confirmed results:
Result: 7 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--Cart (talk) 21:40, 9 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 14 Sep 2019 at 10:52:35 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
Confirmed results:
Result: 15 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Cart (talk) 13:47, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Mammals/Artiodactyla#Family : Bovidae (Bovids)

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 10 Sep 2019 at 08:20:53 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

"Trierisches Fischhaus", etching (1919) by Anton Schneider-Postrum, Trier (Germany).
Confirmed results:
Result: 7 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Cart (talk) 13:45, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Non-photographic_media#Others

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 14 Sep 2019 at 07:00:28 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Cactus with blossom
Fisher.H, the category link still doesn't work. You need to put "Family : Cactaceae" after the # because that's what the sub-section name is. It doesn't magically go looking for words that match. This isn't rocket science, and I would appreciate you taking the time to get it right, rather than us having to fix things for you every time.. -- Colin (talk) 11:44, 5 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--Cart (talk) 13:46, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 18 Sep 2019 at 07:21:17 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
Thank you for nominating this image. Unfortunately, it does not fall within the Guidelines and is unlikely to succeed for the following reason: Disturbing overhead lines and pole. Yann (talk) 14:41, 9 September 2019 (UTC)[reply] Anyone other than the nominator who disagrees may override this template by changing {{FPX}} to {{FPX contested}} and adding a vote in support. Voting will then continue in the usual way. If not contested within 24 hours, this nomination may be closed.

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 19 Sep 2019 at 06:27:46 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Shadhu in Pasupatinath Temple

 I withdraw my nomination--Bijay chaurasia (talk) 12:13, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--Basile Morin (talk) 00:11, 11 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 13 Sep 2019 at 03:57:32 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Rajamangala hal

Alternative

[edit]

Rajamangala hal

 I withdraw my nomination No time to make the changes, sorry--Boothsift 03:30, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:
Result: 7 support, 2 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /--Basile Morin (talk) 00:10, 11 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 16 Sep 2019 at 02:19:55 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Bottom view of Kyoto Tower at night, Japan

 I withdraw my nomination After 4 days, obvious lack of enthusiasm. No worry, thanks -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:23, 11 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:
Result: 4 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--Basile Morin (talk) 03:23, 11 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 10 Sep 2019 at 17:58:05 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Lough Hyne
Confirmed results:
Result: 14 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Cart (talk) 22:17, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural#Ireland

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 14 Sep 2019 at 17:10:41 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Bispira Volutacornis
+1 Daniel Case (talk) 00:08, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--Cart (talk) 22:18, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 10 Sep 2019 at 18:33:33 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

The De Haar Castle near Utrecht in the Netherlands.
And near the bench too. --The Cosmonaut (talk) 18:49, 1 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done Thanks for the hints. Cheers --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 20:32, 1 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Nice, the line is gone from the sky, but it's still present left of the church, see note. --The Cosmonaut (talk) 21:42, 1 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done fixed, thanks --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 07:50, 2 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
+1 -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:10, 5 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 10 support, 3 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /--Cart (talk) 22:15, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Castles and fortifications#Netherlands

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 10 Sep 2019 at 17:01:37 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Laverty Falls, Fundy National Park, Canada
Confirmed results:
Result: 4 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--Cart (talk) 22:14, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 15 Sep 2019 at 00:50:42 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Borbo cinnara (Rice swift) on a leaf
Confirmed results:
Result: 17 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Boothsift 05:25, 11 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera#Family : Hesperiidae (Skippers)

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 15 Sep 2019 at 00:30:22 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Alexander Nevsky Cathedral, Sofia
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 6 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--Boothsift 05:26, 11 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 11 Sep 2019 at 15:02:25 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Dune near Hidden Vlei with sand blowing over the top
Focus is on the dune, so the shrubs in the foreground are out of it (as well as the background, but that still seems reasonably sharp to me). The top of the dune nevertheless is very soft, presumably because there are no well-defined lines to be sharp in the first place due to the shifting sand. I agree it looks a bit irritating, though. --Domob (talk) 05:54, 3 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 3 support, 8 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--A.Savin 16:29, 11 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 15 Sep 2019 at 10:34:56 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Travis Wetland panorama, Christchurch, New Zealand
Confirmed results:
Result: 13 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 16:28, 11 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural/New Zealand
[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 12 Sep 2019 at 03:37:24 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Confirmed results:
Result: 7 support, 9 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--Cart (talk) 09:12, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Vitascope.jpg, delisted and replaced

[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 12 Sep 2019 at 18:31:47

Result: 12 delist, 0 keep, 0 neutral => delisted and replaced. --Cart (talk) 19:24, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 16 Sep 2019 at 05:36:53 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Taken from the Choir inside Winchester Cathedral, England
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--Cart (talk) 13:19, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 17 Sep 2019 at 20:05:11 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Windows in Stockholm, Sweden

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 13 Sep 2019 at 15:12:21 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Cascade de Saunhac in commune of Salles-la-Source , Aveyron, France
[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 16 Sep 2019 at 15:25:35 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Young goldfinch
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--Cart (talk) 21:11, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 12 Sep 2019 at 20:59:18 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Vineyards on the Main between Volkach and Fahr
Confirmed results:
Result: 14 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Cart (talk) 21:08, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Agriculture#Germany

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 16 Sep 2019 at 16:25:33 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Northern Electric telephone
Confirmed results:
Result: 15 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Cart (talk) 21:15, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects#Machines

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 13 Sep 2019 at 03:22:27 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Montmorency Falls, Quebec, Canada.
Confirmed results:
Result: 3 support, 6 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--Cart (talk) 10:40, 13 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 22 Sep 2019 at 09:29:02 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Watermills of Maroilles Abbaye in Nord, France

 I withdraw my nomination --Pierre André (talk) 19:14, 13 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 18 Sep 2019 at 20:53:27 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION

 I withdraw my nomination Tomer T (talk) 08:45, 13 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 13 Sep 2019 at 09:07:48 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Bladder wrack in Sämstad harbor
  • That's surface ripples going in different directions and interfering with each other so you can even get a checkered pattern, especially when it's enhanced by sunlight. The photo is taken from a jetty, so not an underwater photo. Even when the water is very calm you get small waves from fish and other creatures living in and about the wrack. The waves bounce off stones and the jetty's poles and become tiny ripples. It's impossible to avoid. I think I took about 60-70 photos of this patch and this is the one where ripples are least obstructive. The second best was this. --Cart (talk) 18:18, 4 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Tnx Cmao20! I could of course visit the local aquarium and get photos without waves, but like with animals, it's nicer to get the photos in a natural habitat. In this case even a watertight house for the camera wouldn't work since these algae grow in the surface zone. This is the only way to get photos of these little forests from above. Ripples and waves are the "water equivalent" of haze in the air; sometimes unavoidable. At least they can also add to a photo. ;-) --Cart (talk) 15:58, 5 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 10 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 23:15, 13 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Other lifeforms#Class : Phaeophyceae

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 17 Sep 2019 at 15:38:25 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Ruined armenian church inside Lori Berd (Lori Fortress), a 11th-century fortress located in the Lori Province, Armenia.
Confirmed results:
Result: 12 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 23:16, 13 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Religious buildings#Armenia

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 14 Sep 2019 at 14:07:39 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Karlholm former ironworks, Karlholmsbruk, Sweden
Confirmed results:
Result: 9 support, 0 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /--Cart (talk) 16:15, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Industry#Sweden

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 14 Sep 2019 at 13:39:33 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
Confirmed results:
Result: 8 support, 2 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /--Cart (talk) 14:22, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Mammals/Artiodactyla#Family : Cervidae (Deers)

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 14 Sep 2019 at 13:43:55 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Sejile Beach
Confirmed results:
Result: 2 support, 7 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--Cart (talk) 16:14, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 18 Sep 2019 at 05:47:41 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Shadhu in Pasupatinath Temple
Confirmed results:
Result: 18 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Cart (talk) 13:26, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: People#Sitting people

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 14 Sep 2019 at 17:16:21 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Mandarin duck
Confirmed results:
Result: 10 support, 6 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--Cart (talk) 22:01, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 14 Sep 2019 at 19:26:22 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Snota peek seen from Bossvasshøgda
 Question Shall I try to adjust the white balance? --Frankemann (talk) 06:17, 7 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
That's up to you! Charles (talk

) 12:20, 7 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Info Adjusted the white balance. --Frankemann (talk) 06:36, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 3 support, 4 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /--Cart (talk) 22:02, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 23 Sep 2019 at 05:47:16 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Rock Glenn Falls, Ontario, Canada.

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 23 Sep 2019 at 05:24:31 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Panorama of Vernazza, Italy

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 15 Sep 2019 at 08:12:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Portugal, Lisbon, Praça do Comércio, Estátua de D. José I
Confirmed results:
Result: 3 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--Cart (talk) 10:40, 15 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 19 Sep 2019 at 03:50:59 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Otira River in Arthur's Pass National Park, New Zealand
Confirmed results:
Result: 29 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Boothsift 06:08, 15 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural/New Zealand

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 18 Sep 2019 at 21:43:28 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Wallace's flying frog (Rhacophorus nigropalmatus), Khao Sok National Park, Thailand
Confirmed results:
Result: 23 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Boothsift 06:08, 15 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Amphibians

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 17 Sep 2019 at 15:32:37 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Night view of the Moscow Kremlin, meaning "fortress inside a city", a fortified complex in the center of Moscow, Russia.
Confirmed results:
Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Boothsift 06:07, 15 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Castles and fortifications#Russia

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 19 Sep 2019 at 09:47:10 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

European roller (Coracias garrulus)
Confirmed results:
Result: 11 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Boothsift 17:22, 15 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Birds#Family : Coraciidae (Rollers)

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 19 Sep 2019 at 09:43:13 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Snowy-bellied hummingbird
Confirmed results:
Result: 13 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Boothsift 17:22, 15 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Birds#Order_:_Apodiformes_(Hummingbirds_and_Swifts)

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 23 Sep 2019 at 10:33:07 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

The U.S. Army - West Point Hat Toss
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/People#Events
  •  Info I saw this on the en-WP Main Page a while ago and I think it is a visually really great photo. It is a bit on the small side, but we are not likely to get a better size anytime soon since the hat toss ceased in 2010. I was thinking about putting it in '/Historical' since it is now in the past, but I don't think it's a historically important event.Striked per comment below. Created by Unknown photographer, U.S. Army - uploaded by Matanya - nominated by W.carter -- Cart (talk) 10:33, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Support -- Cart (talk) 10:33, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Question I was curious about the hat toss ending in 2010. So I googled it. This photo you nominated said it's Class of 2012. But you said hat toss ended in 2010. Plus there's this photo [2] taken of a West Point hat toss in 2017. I did not find anything about the hat toss ending. But I did find this photo [3], an en wiki FP, of the US Naval Academy hat toss saying it started there in 1912. I'm pretty sure they do this at the US Air Force Academy too. I like this photo and will likely vote for it but am simply curious about where you found something that said the hat toss tradition ended. Seven Pandas (talk) 12:03, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • You are right, I was wondering why this was two years after but thought it was a glitch in the upload. Taking another look, I had misread a part of the section in the article and missed that the stopping of the hat toss was in India. My bad. So there might be better photos to come, but I still think this is a great photo and I'll keep the nom. The WP FP you linked to is good, but I find this a better compo with a sunny disposition and mixed gender/race graduates. Thanks for correcting me, --Cart (talk) 13:12, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • I have corrected the small tilt in the photo, but full perspective correction is usually not done when the main subject is people or objects(hats) that would be totally distorted by such an edit. --Cart (talk) 14:10, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
No, it would not. But it does reduce the already insufficient resolution. --The Cosmonaut (talk) 15:39, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for your effort, but I prefer the original. In the edited example, the building suddenly overtakes the people as subject in the photo. IMO the perfect-square-photography is often adhered to a bit too rigorously on this forum. It can take away creativity and liveliness in photos. --Cart (talk) 16:10, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Agree. Let's keep architectural perspective for architectural photos. If you are worrying about tilt and sloping verticals in a people-photo, then you are looking at the wrong thing -- Colin (talk) 18:51, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
So, people-photographers can get away with downsampling and not bothering with correct exposure? Cool, good to know. Obvious geometrical distortion sometimes works in architectural photos, ironically enough. Elsewhere, it is a nuisance that's easy to correct. --The Cosmonaut (talk) 20:48, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Aren't you mixing things up now? The comments above are about perspective correction, not downsampling or exposure. Anyway, we have several examples where the "wow" factor of a photo overrides technical shortcomings (regardless of subject), that is allowed. --Cart (talk) 21:31, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I am not. It says fairly unequivocally in my vote that I oppose due to low resolution as well. I agree that the "wow" factor may occasionally take precedence, but tossed blurry hats somehow fail to make this impression on me. --The Cosmonaut (talk) 21:40, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Oppose If this is not the full resolution available and has been downsized, then it dosen't comply does it? Charles (talk) 08:20, 15 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Charles, AFAIK photos can be available in two versions with two licenses; one smaller that is free and one larger that has some restrictions and is not free. Artists often use this way of spreading their work. --Cart (talk) 08:34, 15 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 20 Sep 2019 at 11:20:59 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION

 I withdraw my nomination Tomer T (talk) 07:10, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 22 Sep 2019 at 22:33:09 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Khor Virap Monastery, Armenia

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 22 Sep 2019 at 08:51:22 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION

 I withdraw my nomination Tomer T (talk) 07:07, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 16 Sep 2019 at 05:41:08 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Here is a photograph taken from the exterior of Gathorpe Hall in England
Confirmed results:
Result: 7 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--Cart (talk) 11:12, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 20 Sep 2019 at 02:31:36 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Dwarf crocodile at Karlsruhe Zoo
Confirmed results:
Result: 17 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Boothsift 07:29, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Reptiles

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 20 Sep 2019 at 03:04:24 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Skylines of the Central Business District, Singapore at dusk
  • Invalid vote. Sorry, unregistered IPs cannot vote here. If you are a registered user who forgot to log in, you might want to have an admin delete this edit to keep your IP hidden. --Cart (talk) 10:14, 15 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 12 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Boothsift 05:49, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Cityscapes#Singapore

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 16 Sep 2019 at 12:24:15 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

The city of Makarska in Dolmatia, Croatia.
Confirmed results:
Result: 5 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--Cart (talk) 13:25, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 16 Sep 2019 at 13:19:43 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

A dip in the road in Färlev
Extended content
  • I rechecked the rules, there's nothing about wow factor. This must have developed over time because I see it mentioned a lot. I think the wow factor is over rated but I'm also sure it's not going away. Seven Pandas (talk) 11:46, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Yep. It's always fun to see what things might come up in the votes on a nom. :) I've even had an oppose partially based on that the photo evoked bad smell. Nothing surprise me anymore, but we have to respect how people feel about something. --Cart (talk) 12:18, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • @Seven Pandas: Check again. The Guidelines say that: "Featured pictures candidates should meet all the following requirements, must have a "wow factor" and may or may not have been created by a Commons user. Given sufficient "wow factor" and mitigating circumstances, a featured picture is permitted to fall short on technical quality.". It annoys me when people point out that I have made a mistake when the mistake is really their own. Be more thorough when checking up on me next time. --Peulle (talk) 14:57, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • @Seven Pandas Jesus H Christ ... does nobody ever read the actual rules? Either you need to get new glasses or you need to brush up on your English. I linked you directly to the wording before and I do so again: Here are the rules. In bulletpoint #2, that's line #3 from the top of the page (so it's not like you had to read very far to find it), it says, and I once again quote: "Featured pictures candidates should meet all the following requirements, must have a "wow factor" and may or may not have been created by a Commons user. ". Is there something about this you don't understand?--Peulle (talk) 08:16, 9 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • "Symbolic meaning or relevance … Opinion wars can begin here … A bad picture of a very difficult subject is a better picture than a good picture of an ordinary subject." The main page states "Please read the complete guidelines before nominating. This is where the "wow factor" section is -- Basile Morin (talk) 23:54, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Basile, would you please stop this infernal obsession you have about indentations and discussion timelines. Your proposal for enforcing your version of the rules for them was shot down in flames at both ANI and Wikipedia talk:Indentation. Now you have gone and moved around Seven Pandas' and Peulle's comments to suit your taste in which order they should be, instead of the order these users wrote them in. That is not acceptable. You should not dictate how people write threads. --Cart (talk) 02:00, 9 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Nonsense. en:Wikipedia:INDENT: "If you want to reply to a comment, but another editor has already done so, just position your own text beneath that other editor's reply, at the same indentation level" (point number 2). Clarity is important, and W.carter is completely wrong to say the hierarchy was moved "to suit my taste". The indentation was fixed per the convention rules. Regards -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:23, 9 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • No. The rules have been written by others and they are explicit: Talk page guidelines#EDIT Some examples of appropriately editing others' comments: Fixing format errors that render material difficult to read. In this case, restrict the edits to formatting changes only and preserve the content as much as possible. Examples include fixing indentation levels". ✓[OK] Done. Anything else? We collapse all the out-of-topic discussions here (1, 2, 3...) A good habit -- Basile Morin (talk) 22:52, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 14 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--MZaplotnik(talk) 21:50, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places#Sweden

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 20 Sep 2019 at 16:52:51 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Grapes
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--MZaplotnik(talk) 22:01, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 20 Sep 2019 at 16:45:39 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Munch's Madonna
Confirmed results:
Result: 14 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--MZaplotnik(talk) 21:59, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Non-photographic_media#Nudes

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 17 Sep 2019 at 07:18:12 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Interior of a poppy blossom, 21 frames stacked
Confirmed results:
Result: 10 support, 1 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /--Cart (talk) 13:33, 17 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Plants#Family : Papaveraceae

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 21 Sep 2019 at 05:11:20 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • Please double check what I'm going to say, but last time I talked about this, the trend was to seat on that lighting scheme copyrighting. I was told that the claim was abusive and that it would likely not withstand trial. - Benh (talk) 20:42, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 13 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Cart (talk) 13:35, 17 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Towers#France

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 17 Sep 2019 at 20:06:01 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

VARIO folding camera
Confirmed results:
Result: 8 support, 4 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /--Cart (talk) 21:12, 17 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects#Optical devices
[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 17 Sep 2019 at 14:17:45 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page

Confirmed results:
Result: 8 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Cart (talk) 21:13, 17 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Interiors/Religious buildings#France

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 18 Sep 2019 at 13:29:51 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Ruins of abandoned apartment building in Chernobyl after the 1986 nuclear accident

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 24 Sep 2019 at 18:54:25 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Landscape in the Tetlin National Wildlife Refuge, Alaska, United States.
  • I like the picture, but I agree with you that the best bit about it is the interesting mountains in the distance. In some ways I would almost prefer a crop about 40% the way along so that the focus was on the right-hand side of the panorama, which is much more interesting than the left. But it's worth pointing out that great light is hard to come by in Alaska. Cmao20 (talk) 15:28, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Why should that be? The golden hour is even longer. Chance of northern lights too. We get plenty overcast dull days or rainy days in the UK but that isn't an excuse for me. The point is this is a "I happened to be here at this time and got out of my car on the Alaska highway" photo rather than some of the mountain hikes we see from Podzemnik. There's no subject, just a lazy "grab everything" panorama, which seem to be about half the photos from these trips. The cylindrical projection naturally bends the top (mountain) and bottom (lakeside, river) so many of these panoramas are very distorted when you compare to the reality... but there is no geocoding, and nothing more specific in the description than a national park of 2,833 km², which is like me saying "Somewhere in the Lake District". -- Colin (talk) 15:52, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • I'm not seeing someone demotivating others here, but more a message of "no, not all the pictures you take in a trip is worth FP label". It is still possible to upload pictures for the sole purpose of having them available for articles illustration or just adding up to the Commons repository. - Benh (talk) 20:54, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • I gave up reviewing your lazy nominations a while back. I only popped in after I saw Benh's review and saw it was a bit lonely. These cylindrical projection panoramas, they're all a bit rubbish. I know you took hundreds of them and are determined to nominate every bloody one in your back catalogue, but please no. Let's have some photos with composition and where you have actually sought out great light. Remember, for all the easy unspectacular FPs you get, there are many others here who see their new fresh work picked apart for dust spots, wonky horizons, boring composition, no wow, etc, etc. At least they tried. You aren't even trying any more. What does it mean, Poco, to be a photographer if you aren't trying to be a better photographer tomorrow? The rest of us take the criticism we get at FPC and try to improve our next photographs. You, you stopped uploading new photos a while back, in some huge sulk. And do let me know when you are offering at least as many reviews as your FPCs require each month. Because "contributing to Commons" also involves doing your share of reviewing, praising and criticising other's photos too. -- Colin (talk) 21:12, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The second half of your clause is nonsense and bears no resemblance to what I wrote. But the first half. Let's be clear so I'll say it again. These cylindrical projection panoramas, they're all a bit rubbish. That isn't "my[your] work". Just some of it. Well, hundreds of the bloody things to be honest. If you can't deal with folk thinking some of your photos are "a bit rubbish" then please stop nominating and go out and take some better ones. Do your fair share of reviewing, take, upload and nominate an excellent photo with great composition and light, and I'll give you a big green support template. How about that for some motivation? Most other people seem to manage. -- Colin (talk) 21:26, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Here's what I'm talking about: this one is photography, with the monastery, mountain and nearby hill all arranged and filling the frame, and the light bringing out the form of these. It was nominated shortly after you took it, so clearly you thought it was one of your best. It got 23 supports. Whereas this one is not photography, it is merely standing on a high point and rotating while pressing the shutter. We get a strong distortion of reality, and lots of tiny elements in a fairly empty canvas. It was nominated years after you took it. It got 4 supports, including your own, and five opposes before you withdrew. Concentrate on nominating photos you think will get 20+ supports, and learn from your failed noms,and take and upload some new material. I'd understand if, after all the years you've been here, you got failed noms that were experimental and radical, but you get failed noms that are boring with obvious flaws you should have noticed, or that are similar to existing FPs you've already got. That just makes reviewing your work tedious, especially when you don't review your share. You still haven't fixed the geocoding or the dust spot, which is basic stuff. -- Colin (talk) 06:48, 17 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Colin's comments are valid from a photographic perspective. But I consider his accusations that Poco2's photos have "zero composition", that he is "lazy" and that his nominations are "rubbish" are offensive. Are there any sanctions available? If not, perhaps it is time for this POTY winner to submit some photographs of his own for us to vote on. And I don't believe there is any harm in nominating old material. I have dozens of photos I've taken that I could consider nominating. And Poco is a regular voter. Charles (talk) 10:36, 17 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Charles, it is quite acceptable to make serious accusations provided there is evidence. We have here a nomination of a landscape photo with no closer location information than a national park of 2,833 km² and a very obvious dust spot in thumb. So I'm quite happy that those accusations, of a regular who knows the standards others are expected to meet, are amply supported by evidence. I don't think you'd let me off with "Lake in East Anglia.jpg". Charles, there are plenty nominations where you have opposed with one word "composition", so please don't lecture me about my point that a ~180° panorama has "zero composition". Of course it does. The point about old material, in case you haven't noticed, is that old material is all Poco has nominated for a long time. Poco is a very occasional voter, but serial nominator. He requires more review time per FP than anyone else here. He's actually received more oppose votes this month than he has given reviews himself, so we're a long way from doing as much as others do. -- Colin (talk) 11:06, 17 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Anyway, we are recycling arguments made by all many months ago and no progress since then. Seems pointless to waste any more time here. Unwatching. -- Colin (talk) 11:29, 17 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I made it clear that Colin's comments are valid from a photographic perspective. My post complains about Colin's offensive language, nothing else. I am really surprised that most other voters here don't seem to mind. Charles (talk) 11:36, 17 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • @Charlesjsharp: Well I also think Colin might be a little harsh on his wording, but I think what he says often make sense. At least he has the courtesy of developping his opinion rather than making friendly votes or avoid opposing. The point with Poco is that it seems he's only hunting FP stars, and is careless in his noms. Most noms here seem much more carefully thought. Poco will simply nominate ALL his backlog and ensure he has always two active noms to make the most of it. We all come back with thousands of pictures of our trips. Only he doesn't filter as much as we do, ruining the value of an FP overall (what's the point of getting a star if a picture like this is promoted??). I'd rather point this out. - Benh (talk) 11:53, 17 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Very valid point Benh! Thanks so much for stating that. And regarding the geocode, I have been adding it to nearly all of my uploads for 6-7 years now; I wonder how many of Poco's uploads have geocode. As it seems, if only his FPC nominated pictures would all have one, this would be a huge progress. But useless to request it from someone for whom it's only about his own convenience and FP count. --A.Savin 14:35, 17 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • May I interrupt this "let's cover Poco with shit" party? Will not answer each individual comment as I've other things to do, but I do feel that I'm a regular nominator and reviewer here, as I am in QI. I travel often (like in the last 2 weeks) and I don't have the needed bandwidth to download and review images, nominating is easier as I prepare the candidates when I'am at home. I've added geodata to most of my FPCs and some QI (whenever somebody asks for it). Of course that I distinguish between solid and acceptable FPs and see no drama to nominate also the latter. Ruining FP would be accepting images as FP which shouldn't, but that's rather up to reviewers no the nominators. Yes, Colin is often rude in his language, which is a constant when I am the subject. Poco2 19:20, 17 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • I much prefer this crop. Is it worth pinging the two undecided/neutral voters here? Cmao20 (talk) 19:27, 17 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Hold on a second. This is a totally different crop. You can't just cut out half the photo and not notify everyone who voted. You should have kept the original and uploaded the crop as a separate file and offered it here as an alt. That's the normal process. Many of the comments above are about the extra wide panorama and you've just invalidated them all by breaking our clear policy on file overwriting, which specifically disallows a radical crop. -- Colin (talk) 19:43, 17 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 25 Sep 2019 at 23:28:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Speargrass Creek Route to Angelus Hut, Nelson Lakes National Park, New Zealand

 I withdraw my nomination Thank you for the reviews--Boothsift 22:54, 17 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 22 Sep 2019 at 10:22:18 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

BMW Mini Cooper in Dülmen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany
Confirmed results:
Result: 12 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 13:37, 18 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects/Vehicles/Land_vehicles#Automobiles

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 18 Sep 2019 at 17:28:16 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

De Rotterdam - detail of facade
Confirmed results:
Result: 16 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Cart (talk) 21:03, 18 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture#Netherlands

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 19 Sep 2019 at 03:34:23 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Elephant Trunk in classic Hubble Palette (Ha/OIII/SII) by amateur astronomer Chuck Ayoub
@Peulle: The only problem is that is not a NASA image, but was selected by NASA itself for their Astronomy Picture of the Day--Boothsift 22:57, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 11 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Cart (talk) 07:01, 19 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Astronomy

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 23 Sep 2019 at 10:26:54 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Rosa Parks being fingerprinted by Deputy Sheriff D.H. Lackey after being arrested for boycotting public transportation
Confirmed results:
Result: 14 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Cart (talk) 14:12, 19 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Historical#1950-1960

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 23 Sep 2019 at 18:07:10 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
Probably. Why? --ModriDirkac (talk) 21:19, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--Cart (talk) 21:04, 19 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 23 Sep 2019 at 19:54:03 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Edro III shipwreck at sunrise, Coral bay, Paphos, Cyprus
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--Cart (talk) 21:05, 19 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 20 Sep 2019 at 00:49:36 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
Possibly. ✓ Done --D-Kuru (talk) 09:06, 11 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I also thought about if tif or jpeg is the better one. However, tif can be used for lossless quality, jpg not. Why should we prefer non-lossless over lossless quality? Wouldn't this just be an incetive to not-share the better version? --D-Kuru (talk) 13:28, 11 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
It is not uncommon that the jpeg version is promoted to FP since it is easier to handle and the tif is maintained as an original reference. (Here is one of the latest examples.) A good photo is not just about the quality of the photo, it is also about how accessible the photo is. Not all wiki users have the same high technology standard we here at FPC might have. There is a sharpened TIF version if you prefer that. --Cart (talk) 14:07, 11 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Looking at the hiar on it's back. How it that not in focus? --D-Kuru (talk) 13:28, 11 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Yes the hair on the back is Ok. But we focus our attention on the body. And the composition/crop with the white area bottom left is not appealing. Charles (talk) 13:39, 11 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 2 support, 6 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--Cart (talk) 08:10, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 27 Sep 2019 at 06:57:17 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Mist (visible atmospheric water) shortly before sunrise

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 26 Sep 2019 at 18:15:06 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

The poor man's Scream
  • @Benh: Had a glance at your self portrait, which is in my opinion much better and more personal (although no clue at all if similar or not). By curiosity, why should have we "laughed" with this one? I suppose because of the file name, but this name can be interpreted two ways : 1) Poor man = guy painted, or 2) = guy painter. Right? -- Basile Morin (talk) 05:38, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Hi, I hope you laughed because I intended it from the start :) this was my first try with oil painting. I knew I wouldn’t come out with Orsay museum exposable material. So I tried something funny instead. The originals are really scary and convey very uncomfortable feeling. Probably not the case here. And poor man’s because it’s obviously a low grade version of the Scream. I don’t know what you mean by "similar" but yes the self portrait had different meaning and is quite faithful to reality. That really ressembles me :) - Benh (talk) 06:27, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 20 Sep 2019 at 07:38:01 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Maison Carrée in Nîmes, Gard, France
Confirmed results:
Result: 3 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--Cart (talk) 08:21, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 26 Sep 2019 at 14:38:07 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

A southeast view of Bunratty Castle and the nearby Durty Nelly's pub
  • Well, it's a new experience for me to be two days into the nom and have no reviews at all . I still think this is a great pic, but it seems like others are not enthused; however, I'd love to hear some opinions one way or the other. Cmao20 (talk) 15:58, 19 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Oppose That was on my toreview... but I'm struggling to find time this week :) In short, nothing wrong (it's a DXR, we get the insurance it's flawless technically), but neither the castle or the pub are shown in proper glory in my view. The castle is overcast by the pub, which is cover by the bridge. - Benh (talk) 21:34, 19 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment: while there is nothing, in my opinion, fundamentally wrong with this photo, the composition is underwhelming. The castle is partially obscured by a rather boring bar; murky water in the foreground is not terribly appealing either. --The Cosmonaut (talk) 21:42, 19 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 I withdraw my nomination Thanks to everyone who voted. It seems unlikely this picture will get enough support to pass, which is a shame as the technical quality is flawless, but I guess it could be construed to be a bit low on wow factor. Sorry DXR, I'll try one of your excellent church photos instead next week. Cmao20 (talk) 23:05, 19 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • Cmao20, I always appreciate if somebody likes any of my images enough to nominate them - perhaps more than the star itself. In this case, I do probably agree with Benh et al that this picture was probably more a good QI than a FP, but many thanks anyhow! --DXR (talk) 00:26, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--Cmao20 (talk) 23:06, 19 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 20 Sep 2019 at 04:30:01 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Sunny green paddy fields with trees and long shadows at golden hour
(Five more) Thanks for the link -- Basile Morin (talk) 09:19, 11 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 9 support, 1 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /--Cart (talk) 08:11, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Agriculture#Laos

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 24 Sep 2019 at 06:05:40 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--Cart (talk) 15:45, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 24 Sep 2019 at 07:31:32 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Willow in the Red Zone, Christchurch, New Zealand
  • Please don't. If rotated, I think it will just look like any other tree distorted by some special lens or "fixed" in post-processing. Having it this way makes you think twice about the angle IMO. --Cart (talk) 16:58, 15 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Yes, I will. I understand that some folks migh find it ankward though. I was laying under the willow, thinking about life when I got the idea to take a shot of what I was actually looking at. I tried to rotate it but it just looks weird to me. It evocates a real tree from a classic angle - these are thick branches under about 45 degrees angle plus tiny branches that go all the way down. So this rotation makes sense to me. Thanks for the support. --Podzemnik (talk) 23:05, 15 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 14 support, 0 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /--Cart (talk) 15:46, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural/New Zealand
[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 25 Sep 2019 at 01:15:23 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 7 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--Cart (talk) 09:14, 21 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 25 Sep 2019 at 01:11:29 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--Cart (talk) 09:13, 21 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 21 Sep 2019 at 09:00:55 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Watermills in Abbay Maroilles Nord (France)

Alternative

[edit]

Confirmed results:
Result: 5 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--Cart (talk) 09:20, 21 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 24 Sep 2019 at 21:05:34 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Pier 66 and Hudson Yards in New York City
  • Thanks. Please do go ahead and add labels if you spot something that could use them. As for Javits, I give you BookExpo, Comic Con, and (last year anyway) PetCon. I had also planned to attend Anime NYC to take pictures, but when I got there (a) I had just been to Comic Con, which is much better for that sort of thing, and (b) I saw PetCon was on the other end of the building, and, well, c'mon. :) — Rhododendrites talk18:03, 18 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 14 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Cart (talk) 09:09, 21 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Cityscapes#United States

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 24 Sep 2019 at 19:32:06 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
Confirmed results:
Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Cart (talk) 09:11, 21 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture#India

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 25 Sep 2019 at 07:12:21 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • It looks like an abbreviation of Ardea purpurea. It's not entirely out of the ballpark, but it should probably be changed to something more meaningful - especially if the nomination succeeds.--Peulle (talk) 10:21, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 18 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Cart (talk) 17:20, 21 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Birds/Pelecaniformes

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 25 Sep 2019 at 09:43:46 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Broken Beach, Nusa Penida
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--Cart (talk) 17:21, 21 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 25 Sep 2019 at 09:42:25 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Javan Green Peafowl
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--Cart (talk) 17:22, 21 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 25 Sep 2019 at 18:31:44 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--Cart (talk) 21:30, 21 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 25 Sep 2019 at 13:18:46 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--Cart (talk) 21:31, 21 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 21 Sep 2019 at 13:47:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Bégéarss from The Guilty Mother
Confirmed results:
Result: 4 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--Cart (talk) 21:31, 21 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 22 Sep 2019 at 09:56:17 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

File:A stream on a track between Sabine Hut and Speargrass Hut, Nelson Lakes National Park, New Zealand.jpg
  • There is a lot of brownish stuff because it's in the middle of the winter. Also, it's a native bush which makes the view a bit raw. I was thinking about removing the orange triangle but I quite like it - it's so typical for NZ bush that I just keep it on my pictures - but I understand that it might look distracting for others. Podzemnik (talk) 08:40, 15 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

* Support -- Podzemnik (talk) 09:56, 13 September 2019 (UTC) double vote --Steindy (talk) 19:22, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • @Daniel Case The rule of thumb is that what is not evergreen, is not native to NZ. This is a native forest, it's never been cut down before. In the winter, everything is wet and muddy and kind of dark green, in the summer it's a bit more green and many shrubs are flowering (but some shrubs and trees are flowering in the winter too...). But it's green all year around. When I first came here, I was quite amazed by hiking in the snowy bush where everything was green but covered in snow. Quite unusual sight for a European. You should come to check it out. --Podzemnik (talk) 02:20, 17 September 2019 (UTC) PS: The picture was taken at about 800m above the sea level. This one is just a couple of days before from 1600m. --Podzemnik (talk) 02:23, 17 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 11 support, 2 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /--Cart (talk) 13:47, 22 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural/New Zealand

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 26 Sep 2019 at 11:59:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Lady chapel, church of St Peter and St Paul
Thanks. Diliff's are the standard to aim at. His church interiors are typically downsized about 50% and range from 30-70MP. -- Colin (talk) 15:16, 17 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Benh, I believe there used to be a rood screen, which was removed and the sides of this lady chapel were made from it. Other parts of the screen were placed at the back of the church (here and here). -- Colin (talk) 18:23, 17 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • So the phrase "Now where did I put my blessed glasses..." has a new meaning for you now. :-) Be thankful it's only your glasses that turns up in photos, I'm an expert in parking my car in positions where it becomes an unwanted addition to the composition. --Cart (talk) 08:29, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
My car (at that time) is front and center here. Daniel Case (talk) 16:46, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 16 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Cart (talk) 13:48, 22 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Interiors/Religious buildings#United Kingdom‎

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 26 Sep 2019 at 13:01:42 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Sintra Palácio Nacional
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--MZaplotnik(talk) 21:57, 22 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 26 Sep 2019 at 18:54:24 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page

Confirmed results:
Result: 11 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--MZaplotnik(talk) 22:01, 22 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Interiors/Religious buildings#United Kingdom

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 23 Sep 2019 at 00:33:09 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
Confirmed results:
Result: 3 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /MZaplotnik(talk) 21:54, 22 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 26 Sep 2019 at 16:41:04 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Fishing boat Frifararen at Vikavet Museum
  • Fixed Michielverbeek and Fischer.H, I liked a bit of drama of near silhouettes against the gale, but maybe I was too bold since I got those comments immediately. I've recovered a bit of the light on the boat and stone, not sure it's enough though. The boat is facing north, so you can't get full front sunlight on it --Cart (talk) 17:53, 17 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
...I knew I should have checked the boat for bodies... --Cart (talk) 21:05, 17 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Support: I don't understand the aversion to shadows that seems to be widespread around here. Of course, there are instances when shadows are too dark and obscure too much, but in this case the shadow adds something, rather than distracts. --The Cosmonaut (talk) 23:03, 17 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Ah, just realized the current version was brightened. The original was indeed too dark. --The Cosmonaut (talk) 23:19, 17 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 25 Sep 2019 at 07:08:43 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION

 I withdraw my nomination Tomer T (talk) 10:24, 23 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 26 Sep 2019 at 21:31:47 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Venice very early in the morning
  • Thank you Charles. Just, are we talking about the gondolas? Because the exposure was long enough for motion blur to show (I believe it's even an exposure blending). But yes not the sharpest work for sure generally speaking. - Benh (talk) 22:18, 17 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Sorry I was a bit busy today. I remember thinking about fixing that some time ago. Not sure if it isn't due to exposure blending. Not even sure I did exposure blending really... that was 4 years ago. But will go back at that, hopefully this week. And thanks (to everyone) for the review(s). - Benh (talk) 22:58, 18 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Same, have been busy. I saw the annotation you did, and it might improve the effect of the lines drawing your eyes to the sun. But on the other hand, Uoaei asks for wider crop... so ?? Maybe it's subjective issue here... - Benh (talk) 22:58, 18 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 20 support, 0 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /--MZaplotnik(talk) 06:21, 23 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Cityscapes#Italy

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 27 Sep 2019 at 06:25:42 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Wilhelminapier in Rotterdam
Confirmed results:
Result: 16 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Cart (talk) 13:13, 23 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Cityscapes#Netherlands

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 27 Sep 2019 at 06:58:46 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • @XRay: Thank you for the review. Yes sharpness could be much better. The camera on the Mavic 2 pro is everything but stellar. It's pretty good, but nothing compared to the 1" Sony RX100 series for example (lens-wise and sensor-wise). To be honest, I didn't really plan this shot. It was more or less a test flight and that beautiful light was unexpected. But f/3.2 is pretty good for a lens this big. I would say we're not far from the sweet spot here. Stop it down and diffraction start to affect the image (because it's not the relative aperture, but the absolute aperture which affects the quality). 1/2000 is probably because I did the metering on the sun. Again, test flight... The pic came out very dark, so I had to push the EV up (hence the noise). - Benh (talk) 14:45, 23 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 19 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Cart (talk) 13:14, 23 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Natural phenomena#Sun

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 27 Sep 2019 at 07:10:44 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • By all means, works fine. Striked FPD comment and old nominator. Tweaked 'Renominated' to 'Re- nominated' for the sake of FPCBot which might not recognize the combined wording. --Cart (talk) 09:54, 18 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • I remember about that one... I know you are kidding but still thought about feasability of such a shot. First, I don't think above that building is a flight corridor (quickly checked flight radar), and second, wouldn't work with a long exposure ;) But there are many possible spots in HK which might be under a corridor... I only did the tourist spots :) - Benh (talk) 16:55, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 30 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Cart (talk) 13:16, 23 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Cityscapes

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 23 Sep 2019 at 11:31:52 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Military orchestra in front of the Stockholm Palace - close up of the gloved hands of a clarinet player playing his instrument
Confirmed results:
Result: 7 support, 9 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--Cart (talk) 13:17, 23 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 27 Sep 2019 at 13:06:41 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Crab spider (Misumena Vatia) with prey silver-spotted skipper (Hesperia comma)
Confirmed results:
Result: 17 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Cart (talk) 21:50, 23 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Arthropods/Arachnida#Family : Thomisidae (Crab Spiders)

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 27 Sep 2019 at 19:21:59 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

3D digitized model of a replica of the greek sculpture "Discobolus". Replica from Den Kongelige Afstøbningssamling, Statens Museum for Kunst, Copenhagen Denmark.
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /Cart (talk) 21:51, 23 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 23 Sep 2019 at 14:17:29 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
Confirmed results:
Result: 4 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--Cart (talk) 21:52, 23 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 24 Sep 2019 at 04:49:12 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Argiope aurantia - ventral veiw
Understandable, the subject does not have a universal aesthetic appeal :-) --The Cosmonaut (talk) 17:09, 15 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The spider is great, but the background is too busy. --Cart (talk) 17:56, 15 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This is the license I started using 11 years ago, and I haven't thought much about changing it. Is there a disadvantage to still be using it now? --The Cosmonaut (talk) 14:09, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Well, the CC system evolved over the years. Its latest versions are much clearer and more easily applicable in different jurisdictions, see here --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 05:43, 17 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
It looks like 2.5 is still the latest CC version for Canada. I should look at the international one, I suppose. The Cosmonaut (talk) 23:10, 17 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 7 support, 2 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /--Basile Morin (talk) 08:28, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Arthropods/Arachnida#Order_:_Araneae_(Spiders)

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 24 Sep 2019 at 06:06:38 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Pont du Gard, commune of Vers-Pont-du-Gard, Gard, France
  • Invalid vote. Sorry, unregistered IPs cannot vote here. If you are a registered user who forgot to log in, you might want to have an admin delete this edit to keep your IP hidden. --Cart (talk) 10:13, 15 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 13 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 13:34, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Bridges#France

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 24 Sep 2019 at 17:05:53 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

European bee-eaters (Merops apiaster) with dragonflies
  • Certainly not. Look at any of my FPs. The technical quality is not good here as I say in the introduction. With a once-in-a-lifetime wildlife action shot, you don't have time to set everything up. I was in a car (not a bad hide) and had to twist and shoot hand-held using a 400mm lens fitted with 1.4 extender. I'll take it. Charles (talk) 09:23, 18 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for describing the circumstances. --The Cosmonaut (talk) 17:11, 18 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • To explain Neptuul, the FP guidelines say: "A good picture of a difficult subject is an extraordinary photograph." Each voter must make his own mind up as to whether the uniqueness of the shot and the composition outweigh the technical shortcomings. Charles (talk) 16:28, 19 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Info: Image updated after the end of the voting period, please consider all the reviews above in relation with the previous version. -- Basile Morin (talk) 14:36, 7 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Confirmed results:
Result: 16 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Cart (talk) 21:20, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 24 Sep 2019 at 19:20:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Fighting of Greater kudus (Tragelaphus strepsiceros), Chobe National Park, Botswana.
Confirmed results:
Result: 5 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--Cart (talk) 21:21, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 24 Sep 2019 at 18:17:18 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Persicaria maculosa
Confirmed results:
Result: 8 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Cart (talk) 21:23, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Plants#Order : Caryophyllales

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 1 Oct 2019 at 02:28:52 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Jewelry basket or cosmee, from the daisy family

 I withdraw my nomination My apologies to Fischer--Boothsift 04:03, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 1 Oct 2019 at 07:27:30 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Indian peafowl; Maroparque, Breña Alta, La Palma, Canary Islands, Spain

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 29 Sep 2019 at 00:15:47 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Game reserve in Dülmen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany
Confirmed results:
Result: 12 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Cart (talk) 08:18, 25 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural/Germany

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 29 Sep 2019 at 01:12:50 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Eastern great egret head with open beak
Confirmed results:
Result: 14 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Cart (talk) 08:19, 25 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Birds/Pelecaniformes#Family : Ardeidae (Herons)

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 25 Sep 2019 at 12:19:52
SHORT DESCRIPTION

Result: 10 delist, 0 keep, 0 neutral => delisted. --Cart (talk) 13:48, 25 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 29 Sep 2019 at 09:05:23 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Abandoned rusty cargo ship Edro III near Pegeia, Paphos, Cyprus at sunrise
Ping Nino Verde, please see my comment and a note above. --Podzemnik (talk) 19:43, 22 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, i'll remove dust spots today. Sorry, missed your comment. -- Nino Verde (talk) 07:53, 23 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Dust spots removed. Unfortunately correcting horizon will cause resolution change or total redo of photo. -- Nino Verde (talk) 18:08, 23 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 21 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Cart (talk) 13:42, 25 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects/Vehicles/Water_transport#Shipwrecks

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 25 Sep 2019 at 14:43:52 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Chandelier captured from bottom
Confirmed results:
Result: 4 support, 6 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--A.Savin 21:26, 25 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 29 Sep 2019 at 18:08:50 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • Hi Charles. The hill's slopes, which can be seen on the sides, meet in the middle. The lines just go on straight outside the frame so they meet where you think they do (middle). Framing everything in would mean large dark areas in the picture and I personally don't like it. That's also a reason why I cropped out much of the sides. - Benh (talk) 19:01, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I actually liked it a lot as it was but not going to change because of the warmer temp. -- KennyOMG (talk) 19:11, 21 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 18 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 21:26, 25 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Cityscapes

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 2 Oct 2019 at 10:38:51 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Two birch trunks in front of a cliff in Gullmarsskogens nature reserve

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 25 Sep 2019 at 22:38:11 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Wat Phra Kaew, Temple of Emerald Buddha, Bangkok
  • Absolutely. Actually the camera was on the tripod, and several pictures were necessary to clone out a few visitors. Otherwise I could have waited centuries before this place gets empty. And I arrived early morning, before the opening! Thanks -- Basile Morin (talk) 07:49, 17 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment Agree with Benh, but why only 12MP from your 30MP camera? -- Colin (talk) 07:00, 17 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Oppose Low resolution: downsized about 60% with no justification. I am happy to overlook downsizing when the image is >20MP or if there is a good reason why the shot was technically challenging or we are stuck with whatever some external photographer uploaded to Flickr and the shot is outstanding. But not a 30>12MP downsize from a Commons regular. Happy to remove the oppose if full resolution uploaded. -- Colin (talk) 09:08, 17 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Colin, aren't you a bit extreme here? Although I more or less agree with you, this puts quite a pressure on a user IMO (and it's not like that user overwhelms us with his entire Lr catalog). Nothing obliges Basile to upload full size, and 12mpix of that quality seems very reasonable to me. At least, why not express your opinion through a neutral? Just my two cents. - Benh (talk) 21:00, 17 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Benh, back in March, Basile was very adamant in opposing a cormorant photo downsized from 50 to 20MP. The Commons:Image guidelines for FP do ask photographers not to downsize. Most reviewers allow some downsizing for reasons I gave, but may oppose otherwise. The issue has been discussed many times, without being able to come up with a rule we can all agree on. Anyway, I only get one vote so others are quite capable of supporting this if they wish. -- Colin (talk) 09:33, 18 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • To be precise Colin, the downsize was from 26,6 to 20 MP. From 50 to 26,6 was a crop as the bird was pretty far as my longest tele is "only" 600m (or rather 300m x 2). Cropping for such a reason is, I believe, acceptable for wildlife shots. Furthermore I was on a boat (in movement) in the Chobe river and not standing in front of a building. Poco2 09:56, 21 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Info This monument is one of the most, if not the most important of Thailand. Type "main sites Thailand" or "main sites Bangkok" on Google, then you get results like this one or that one showing the Grand Palace in first positions. There was no decent picture on Wikipedia of this building before I upload the file. Check the Category:Wat Phra Kaew. The photograph was shot @11 mm focal length FF, so that I could get the whole buildings after perspective correction (and obviously slight size reduction, which is completely normal in architecture photography). This is not downsized. As said above, it's very difficult to find a good image of this temple on Google without tourist. Then I think the high educational value, with the relative rarity, and the correct light, should make it -- Basile Morin (talk) 10:30, 18 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Support Perspective correction often decreases resolution quite unavoidably, as in the case of this FP. Basile has never, as far as I know, been known for downsizing his images, and so we should take him at his word. Cmao20 (talk) 14:15, 17 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
    • Cmao20 I appreciate that a strong vertical perspective correction in Lightroom will reduce resolution slightly. Some adjustment to the Y Offset often helps avoid having to reduce the scale too much to restore the height with the frame. I tried some fairly extreme "corrections" in lightroom and could not get anywhere close to 60% reduction. I suggest Basile experiments with the Y Offset and should then find that the perspective correction should have minimal impact on resolution. An 11mm lens on full frame is already an extreme ultra-wide, so if one is having to make strong corrections to that, then really we aren't seeing realistic proportions any longer. The state-of-the-art wrt architecture photos on Commons is a stitched photograph with resolution significantly in excess of what the camera produces -- we have loads of such high resolution images. -- Colin (talk) 14:38, 17 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
      • Colin, I mean, yes, such high-resolution stitched images (such as this by you) are truly wonderful, but they don't come around very often at FPC, the vast majority of images of buildings here are single frame. I didn't know we had, as you say, loads of these images, and if we do it'd be nice to see a lot more round at FPC! But for me I don't think we should apply such a high bar to architectural photographs, as a sharp 12.5 megapixel image like this one is really good enough for almost any purposes; it's easily big enough to illustrate the building for any obvious purpose I can think of. Basile's image is not perfect - there's a bit of distortion at the edges, probably because of the perspective correction - but looking at other images of the buildings on the internet, the proportions don't look totally out-of-joint to me, so it's still an accurate depiction of the building. Cmao20 (talk) 14:49, 17 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Thanks, Cmao20, for the comment and accurate research. Yes, this case is exactly the same than Podzemnik's before and after perspective correction + crop. This is not downsized -- Basile Morin (talk) 10:30, 18 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • See User:Colin/PixelPeeping. Yes 12MP is ok for many purposes. It is just a very little short of what is needed for a Nat Geo spread at 300dpi and shorter still than needed for a Vogue spread. One of the ideas I explored in that essay was the difference between a "bold subject" and a "detailed subject". Some images are a bit of both. I want to see the detail of the tiles on this temple, but there isn't the resolution. -- Colin (talk) 15:28, 17 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • @Daniel Case: what do you mean by "downsizing"? I remember I fixed for you the perspectives of your building File:Pratt_Street_skyline_from_Convention_Center,_Baltimore,_MD.jpg nominated in QIC because the operation was too difficult from your side. And now you're still confused with these architectural transformations, and seem ignore how they affect an image. I've said it already two times, but I'll explain one more for you. Also feel free to request my original files, they will make my words even more explicit. This picture is taken with the ultra widest angle rectilinear lens existing in the world. It means the distance is very short in front of these stairs in reality. There's a wall behind my tripod. With a standard focal length, you'd see only the temple and not the two towers. So, you really can't see much larger than this, the camera set upwards as it was. I did a small crop, but if I had used the top of the top professional Canon EOS-1D X Mark II (20.2 Mpx), be sure that the image would have appeared even smaller, without that crop. Why do you see less pixels? Because the image is not UPSIZED (I did not cheat), and because the original file has been transformed (perspectives corrected). It is sharp now, and it makes 4'156 x 3'014 px = 12,5 Mpx, more than 4K, and large enough compared to many other similar pictures in the same category. Now please try to give a link of a better image from the same angle, with a higher definition, if you find on the web. Good luck. Maybe possible in theory, but not in practice. Why is it not a stitched panorama? Due to the number of visitors in this place, technically it is almost impossible. Stitched panos are easy under favorable conditions, like fixed light and empty places. Visit that temple, and you'll understand. You want to see more details? Yeah me too, when I look at the Moon with normal eyes I expect to see the craters, the texture, and every single dust on the surface, this is my dream -- Basile Morin (talk) 05:39, 21 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Oppose Extreme downsizing, and this in a picture from a user who pixelpeeks this issue in other noms with much moderate downsizing under tricky conditions (26,6 > 20 MP of wildlife shot from a moving boat). I seldom agree with Colin, but I definitely do here. Poco2 09:47, 21 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • "Extreme" downsizing, now. Wow! There's only one image uploaded, then I hardly see how it could be downsized from no previous version, lol. This is downsized, yes (check the history), and this too, and this one also. My opinion is you can crop as much as you want at home. Everybody do that. Because when you shoot camera upwards, you never see exactly what you'll get after perspective correction, then you necessarily need more space around as security. But the guidelines say "Images should not be downsampled (sized down) in order to appear of better quality" (understood after upload of course). I just follow the guidelines. And disagree with you. No problem -- Basile Morin (talk) 10:36, 21 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment Basile, you have no problem selecting wow-y subjects and you have shown that you are very good at using advanced post-processing techniques such as stacking and animating. Have you ever considered using panorama technique? It would have been ideal for a place like this where you can't get far from the subject and you would normally need some special lens to get it all in frame. Pano technique is not just for mountain tops, it works very well in confined spaces or when you are standing in front of a too large subject. The functions for doing it are in the editing programs you already have. In this photo, I had water behind me and could not back enough to get all of the subject in frame and with this large flat petroglyph, I would have needed a drone or crane to get high enough from the cliff. Panos sorted things out. This indoors photo is an extreme example of how much you can do by stitching photos together while being close to the subject. You write that you took several photos of this building to be able to clone out the tourists, while you were doing that, you could have made something like six photos of this scene from your tripod and merged them into one fantastic (and large) image. You should give it a try, I think it would add to your photos to have yet another "tool" to make great photos. This image is not bad, you just have not used the best available technique to capture it. --Cart (talk) 11:24, 21 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Totally agree with Cart that stitching can also be used to get rid of people (and to increase resolution). But also agree that this picture is maybe getting little unfair treatment. - Benh (talk) 14:50, 21 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Thanks, Benh. Sometimes I make stitched panoramas (using Photoshop or Hugin), but it's rare. The first reason is because they very often generate errors, boring to correct (recent example nominated here), by yourself or by others. The second reason is because they generate huge files, boring to manipulate (too long, too slow on a machine, even with enough RAM). The third reason is because these details are rarely useful in 90% of their applications. You really need to print a poster to look at all these, and in practice we almost never print posters. Here I remember I spent a very long time with my tripod waiting that some visitors move in various places. In my originals, I have for example a guy sitting on the stairs, waiting for his girlfriend takes a picture of him. Also a group of Chinese people discussing. Well, you can't tell these visitors "hey, guys, please go out! I'm waiting for you to leave now, my picture is more important please" :-) Thus, if I had to handle that work also for every small part used in a stitched panorama, the time it would have taken would have been impossibly excessive. Probably the light from the sun would have changed from a corner to another one, or maybe a guard would have come to me because one hour at the same place in the middle of a crowd is unacceptable behavior. The problem is that people here seem not to catch the challenge (except you Benh, and perhaps Cmao20 and The Cosmonaut). Of course if all the reviewers in FPC are only familiar with the empty churches and cathedrals, they might not understand what is a popular and ultra crowded site like this temple, gathering a lot of Chinese groups, and other visitors from all countries. Just read the Lonely planet: Wat Phra Kaew is "today Bangkok’s biggest tourist attraction and a pilgrimage destination for devout Buddhists and nationalists". In the light of the guidelines A bad picture of a very difficult subject is better than a good picture of an ordinary subject. I don't think it's so bad, and I'm sure it's difficult -- Basile Morin (talk) 15:35, 21 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • I second Cart's suggestion. Per User:Colin/PixelPeeping this is an image where we would love to see the detail on the temple. We don't need to print out a poster to see that, we can all use the zoom viewer or download full size and explore on our screens. The stitching errors you mention are because you need a panoramic tripod head to get the best results. But even before I had one of those, I could take indoor panoramas with hundreds of people moving about the frame: this and this and this and this were taken hand-held leaning on the handrail, with cheap lens and entry-level DSLR. People like to explore the detail in these photos and they go wow, which is FPC requirement. And the Albert Hall photo Cart links has such resolution and sharpness you can see tiny details in the distance and yet was taken with a £75 plastic 50mm lens. -- Colin (talk) 20:08, 21 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • So many pictures with people that are not cloned out. Different goal, different approach, different technique. When I started photography, that was not even with a DSLR but with a compact camera I didn't even pay (borrowed). Big joy. I also made FPs like this one with cheap lens and cheap body. Possible. Equipment is not all of course and you can possess a Ferrari without being a Formula 1 race champion. Or ride 75 km on a mountain bike instead of a race bike. Perhaps better for your muscles. But plastic lenses break easily and take water. I've also got the cheap EFS 10-18 and the sharpness is far far inferior, incredible comparison. But it also depends on what kind of pictures you make. If you don't care the people, then opt for more pixels. But if you like to see a desert site focusing on the building only, then my technique is better -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:31, 22 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Stitched photos are actually better for avoiding people, if that is what is desired. The overlaps naturally form a place where you have two photos to chose whether to include one person or another. And you can take as many stitched elements as you want and as much repetition as you want. And all the stitched elements above ground level don't have people in them anyway. You do realise all of Diliff's cathedrals and other similar photos are places with loads of tourists and yet he manages to eliminate them all. He ends up with a sharp 60MP wonder rather than a soft 12MP meh. Patience and good technique. The difference is that pretty much all of his nominations pass easily. -- Colin (talk) 07:43, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Question Also Basile, I do a lot of perspective corrections myself and I'm not quite sure how this gets you from 30mp to 12. I do get the borders would be stretch to lots of extent, but the center should still retain its details. - Benh (talk) 15:20, 21 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 4 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 06:34, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 26 Sep 2019 at 06:51:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Window on an old barn in Färlev
  • Then I'd play with the lighting instead (make it more coming from the side). Also, very importantly, it's "Chacun ses goûts" :) (and yes my oppose is very subjective) - Benh (talk) 21:18, 17 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@W.carter: As yours are for me. Daniel Case (talk) 16:47, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 10 support, 3 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 14:16, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects#Other windows

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 30 Sep 2019 at 16:42:52 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Eldridge Street Synagogue in New York City
Confirmed results:
Result: 12 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Cart (talk) 22:16, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Interiors/Religious buildings#United States

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 30 Sep 2019 at 12:33:04 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gina Krog
Confirmed results:
Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Cart (talk) 22:17, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: People

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 30 Sep 2019 at 21:14:10 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Spur-winged lapwing
Confirmed results:
Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /--Cart (talk) 08:41, 27 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Birds/Charadriiformes

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 26 Sep 2019 at 21:27:18 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
Confirmed results:
Result: 15 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Cart (talk) 08:42, 27 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Plants#Family : Papaveraceae

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 1 Oct 2019 at 09:56:40 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

St. Josef, Frankfurt-Höchst
  • I am not sure what to make of this comment. It isn't a very bright place. Of course, it is possible to make it all bright and shiny, but imho, this would be a less faithful representation of reality. Against the white background, it look darkish, but in full screen, the lighting is appropriate. --DXR (talk) 06:11, 23 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Support Excellent but slightly too dark IMO. Why is the metadata incomplete? It would also be interesting to know how the contrast range was handled. This is only possible with HDR technology. Found the description.--Ermell (talk) 09:52, 23 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • There is a trick for when the program 'blanks' metadata. You take the finished photo and put it as a layer on one of the original photos, merge into one layer, and hey presto you have all the metadata from the one photo on your HDR. I do this when I make panoramas and Photoshop deletes my info. Of course, it's not perfect, but metadata from one of the photos included in the HDR or pano, is better than none at all. --Cart (talk) 18:21, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Cart (talk) 13:39, 27 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Interiors/Religious buildings#Germany

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 27 Sep 2019 at 12:59:54 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Preveli palm forest
  • I can totally relate to the way things feel special when you are down in a canyon with the light filtering down for only a short while, but also how hard it is to capture that in a photo. My own photos from a ravine, that I felt were almost magical, were not well received here either. --Cart (talk) 08:44, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 5 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--Cart (talk) 13:37, 27 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 27 Sep 2019 at 19:10:24 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

A long exposure photograph of Falcon 9's SAOCOM 1A launch in October 2018.
Confirmed results:
Result: 6 support, 5 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /--Cart (talk) 21:16, 27 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 4 Oct 2019 at 02:34:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Rock Glen Falls

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 2 Oct 2019 at 10:38:20 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
Confirmed results:
Result: 16 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 13:40, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Reptiles#Family : Viperidae (Vipers)

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 28 Sep 2019 at 07:44:16 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Thung Salaeng Luang National Park
Confirmed results:
Result: 11 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 13:39, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural#Thailand

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 28 Sep 2019 at 06:01:44 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Maldivian dish Kandu Kukulhu prepared by Maldivian chefs at World Heritage Food Festival, 2018
Confirmed results:
Result: 5 support, 7 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--A.Savin 13:38, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 2 Oct 2019 at 10:58:26 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Waterbird in nest
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--A.Savin 13:40, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 28 Sep 2019 at 16:30:19 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
Confirmed results:
Result: 4 support, 6 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--MZaplotnik(talk) 09:16, 29 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 28 Sep 2019 at 22:47:09 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

The skeleton of an abult and a toddler exhibited at the anatomy room of Groningen Universiteitsmuseum.
Confirmed results:
Result: 6 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--MZaplotnik(talk) 09:15, 29 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 5 Oct 2019 at 17:44:35 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Arashiyama Bamboo Grove
  • Yes I could try to stand still. Exposures weren't that long. I shouldn't argument because this is when of personal pointd of view kick in. But since we've been on a chatting streak... ;) It didn't cross my mind to do the johnny walker (it did on the steps) because I simply was "amazed by the height of the bamboo forest" (yes the caption says it all). What you see, even though staged, actually reflects how I felt and I really was staring like this. I'll try your suggestion if I get the chance to go there again. Or you could if you go before me ;) - Benh (talk) 22:30, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • @Michielverbeek: Could you expand on this please? If you talk about the blown out sky, that's the best one can do without it looking unnatural (I'm even thinking it's a bit too dark, but it's more how if feels when you are there). I actually could bring out the blue and orange colors but it would look very weird. - Benh (talk) 21:46, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • I can do something about the bottom part (which is already brightened) but for the sky you are asking for the impossible in my opinion. You can check. And I like the effect of the bright area drawing sort of a palm tree when looking at the picture from distance. About having the sun higher in the sky, not sure if it would help much, but at automn, that would mean heaps of tourists in the frame. Not because on many case a bright area is wrong means it is wrong on all pictures (my two cents). Thank you for your input. - Benh (talk) 07:31, 27 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Basile, I appreciate your inputs. It is noisy (not to boots... come on) because I took a shoot with less overexposed sky... I can't do exposure blending because the branches move, unlike temples. And downsize it to 12mpix, you'll see it's much cleaner. Have you also checked how many 24Mpix photo of that you have on the internet? You should treat pictures you review the same way you expect us to treat yours. - Benh (talk) 21:31, 27 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Here's my take of this place. 0,8s, ISO 50, slightly higher resolution, no noise, no blurry leaves, and normal colors. It seems that yours was taken early morning, mine in the late afternoon. I think I'm fair in my judgment, Benh. Remember votes are subjective (you were alone to oppose this one of mine, for example). Here we are already 3 users to reject this one, and my vote is in the consensus. Probably we don't appreciate light the same way. Many of your pictures are amazing, but this one suffers from important technical problems, really. This is a moderate and very honest review -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:18, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Basile Morin this is not the same conditions. You don't have high contrast because you don't show the upper part with the sky, and your leaves are as not tack sharp either. The light is also "harsher" on yours (less diffuse). Harsh light and blown out area are not the same. "noise", "blurriness", "harsh or not light", these aren't subjective issue. I just want to correct wrong facts. You may not light the light, but it's not harsh. I totally agree that it's too blue and has noise. I challenge people to find a similar shot without the very clear sky. - Benh (talk) 07:32, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Hey, not only I upload a 24,6 MPx image that was supposed to be inexistant on the web, but also especially for you the same subject under better conditions. Frankly, how could I review more equitably? No, my bamboos are not blue. But cut your sky maybe for a more explicit correlation. What is "wrong facts", seriously? We all occasionally meet these kind of special situations where the contrasts are a bit severe. Well, solutions exist to avoid blown areas and colored surfaces. If the exposure had been correctly set on your camera, you would certainly have got decent contrasts and accurate tints & shades. Also, why shooting @200 ISO with a tripod? The perspectives in yours are not vertical, that gives the false impression the plants are naturally curved that way. Sorry this nomination does absolutely not inspire me. There's a similar image in the Lonely Planet book of Japan, much more attractive and successful. Greetings -- Basile Morin (talk) 08:52, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • wait, "better conditions" is not so sure. Had I taken the same at the same time of the day, the contrast would have been higher. I was there in the afternoon too. I shoot ISO 200 because that's the lowest this camera can do ;) And I think I've proven I know solutions exist. Just that in this specific case it's a little tricky. Either I take one shot and lift the shadows, at the cost of noise, or I blend exposures with overlapping moving branches. I did it to some extent on the lower part (less noise if u look). In my view, the noise is not a deal breaker here, and who will pixel peep at this kind of picture? But I'm reworking on it. After the inputs I think I screwed it. It won't solve the bright area... a bright thing should render white, and this, I won't change. But I will fix the blue cast, the noise and see if I can lessen the CA (I don't think so). Yes for the perspective, I added some barrel distorsion in post cuz I like the effect (which caused a lot of failed nom for me in the past). This is subjective, I won't change :) And it doesn't matter if the nom fails because of that. - Benh (talk) 10:05, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • When I was there in June, the sun rose at 4:45am. So early the place might be desert. Then not only you're alone, but also the light can be just adequate. This is very challenging at day time, but well, we judge from the result. Also, where was the sun at that moment, in front or behind? That also is important and affects the final appearance. How do you explain my bamboos look green, at the base, and not those ones? -- Basile Morin (talk) 10:58, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • @Basile Morin: I was there in the early morning and in the afternoon. This is the early morning shot with the sun rising on the right (can't be seen). You can have an idea here. Look closely and you'll see the bottom is orange (I just let it bright). My bamboos look blue because I screwed up my processing. I will fix (work in progress there). Not sure I'll nominate again, but I will see. Thanks again for this talk. - Benh (talk) 19:04, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Oppose per Martin and Basile. Great idea, subject and composition, but the harsh light / overexposed sky and the quality drawbacks mentioned make any reuse difficult --Kreuzschnabel 20:23, 27 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment Hmm ! Surprised with the unanimous opposes. I thought this shot was special (it usually wows people I show it to). Also surprised with the harsh light criticism... the sun was rising, and with it usually a soft light. One can look and won't see my own shadow simply cuz the light was diffused. Some people sell the shot with more blown out area for 4000 bucks. I do agree with the CA (can't do much) and with the too blue tones. I'll do what I can to fix. Thanks a lot for the inputs (will cancel the nom). - Benh (talk) 21:31, 27 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Neutral Per Basile, sorry. On a side note, bamboo aren't trees . --Boothsift 22:05, 27 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  •  I withdraw my nomination Thank you for the honest inputs. Hope you didn't take it wrong that I challenge them (I consider we're not on Flickr and here to discuss) - Benh (talk) 07:35, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 3 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /MZaplotnik(talk) 09:30, 29 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 3 Oct 2019 at 04:40:03 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Flower of Calathea warscewiczii
Confirmed results:
Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--MZaplotnik(talk) 09:21, 29 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Plants

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 2 Oct 2019 at 19:41:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Mountain view in Robson valley
We had a "snowy discussion" before. Snow works like a mirror and it's natural to have bits of blown areas. Human's eye would perceive it that way anyway. I personally think it's OK. --Podzemnik (talk) 21:33, 23 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I'm aware of said discussion and while I'm not onboard I can understand the reasoning for the other picture. Here, it adds nothing and would take a total to 5 minutes to fix. It was possible 15 yrs ago for directly lit snow capped peaks and for whitewashed walls blasted by the Sun in an otherwise dark and shadowy scene (both are single exposure non-hdr). In any case all I've said was it's great but I think it would benefit from a little extra attention. -- KennyOMG (talk) 13:54, 25 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 15 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--MZaplotnik(talk) 09:19, 29 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural/Canada#British_Columbia

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 2 Oct 2019 at 20:31:55 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Peyto Lake in winter
Confirmed results:
Result: 13 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--MZaplotnik(talk) 09:22, 29 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural/Canada#Alberta

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 2 Oct 2019 at 21:50:28 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • Well yes. But my gear is still the equivalent of a 18mm f/3.0 in full frame, which is still good option from a light gathering capability (which is what we should be aiming at when considering setup). Then there's sensor technology. The X-T2 is old, but not that much, and Fuji has good reputation for low noise because their sensors have more green photosites. But iso6400 in dark conditions is still iso6400 no matter what, and it was still a dark shot that needs some little +EV. I also choose to go light in NR. There are a lot of more advances techniques for shooting starry skies too. Some people do shoot foreground at low iso, and sky at high ISO, some do stitching (I could), when the sky is clear. But here I wanted me on the foreground, and I didn't have the clear sky anyways. Just to give some context. Remember that these aren't that easy conditions either... I'm constrained by the rotation of the stars (Earth actually, but all is relative), and I have a fixed element to consider. - Benh (talk) 22:15, 23 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Or if you have a small-sensor camera where anything over ISO 1600 looks like crap and you get the milky way barely visible. I also found out that it's totally useless to downsize star photos, even if they are way noisy, since you lose too much of the stars in the NR and that the difference is visible even at small thumb. --Cart (talk) 08:27, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • @W.carter: I'm quite happy with my Sony RX100m4's performance with astrophotography. To illustrate, I've just uploaded two pictures of the Carrouges Castle in Normandy: one taken with my Fuji + Samyang 12mm and another one taken with a 1" Sony RX100m4. Don't know about you, but I would not hesitate to nominate astrophoto shot with a 1" (like yours) here. And I'm glad to know I can travel with just that small camera in remote places and still have the possibility to astro shoot. Your issue comes more from your not dark enough location (you didn't need me to know, but for other readers). Also, from that latitude, it's unlikely you'd see much of the brighter galactic center. - Benh (talk) 17:10, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • I know that my little Sony RX100 (which I like for the same reason you do; it's always with me) takes ok star photos like this (FP!) shot in only moonlight on the other side of the peninsula. I was just taking the Panasonic with the same sensor size but better lens for a test run, since I wanted to see if it was possible at all to get the Milky Way over the sea. I tested several ISO from 800 to 12800, that's how I came to the conclusion about max 1600. But for some strange reason, the Sony is better for night photos, not sure why. Thanks for the light map!, although it hasn't taken into account all the tankers and cargo ships in the area. I also know I should be a bit patient. In Swedish we call the Milky Way 'The Winter Way' since that is when we see it best. I was just hoping that I could perhaps get something now instead of standing waiting for the camera in the freezing snow. ;) --Cart (talk) 18:02, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • I don't know which sensor Panasonic uses, but I can tell you that not all 1" sensors are alike noise-wise and DR-wise. The one in the Mavic 2 pro sucks (sorry), and I find it to be very noisy in dark areas. Sony is currently far far ahead as far as I can tell. The light map isn't everything. That Sept 17th night, you had a 90% full moon not that far (It rised a few minutes after you took the shot I believe). That really affects milky way visibility from my experience (on my shots, I also had full moon, that's what lits the castle. On other shots I don't show, we barely see the milky way). In fact, my "planner" software (Photopills) rates your night 1/10 for milky way visibility. I'm also surprised about your winter story. In December for instance, at solstice, the galactic center is far under the horizon, especially in your latitudes. I guess the Winter Way is more due to long nights giving you longer windows for gazing at the stars. But that is certainly not a good thing for milky way gazing. - Benh (talk) 21:17, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Yes the moon rose a bit later behind my back (got some nice shots), but lots of high cliffs here to shut it out for a good while. I think the Winter Way is because our summer nights are so bright you can hardly see any stars at all, so winter=stars. The good thing about the dark winter is that you can do your night photos before dinner and don't have to stay up all night. :) Thanks for the chat and all your good advice, hope it's been of use to other readers as well. --Cart (talk) 21:32, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Out of curiosity, I just made calculation and my Sony RX100m4 @wide end and f/1.8 is the same as 24mm f/5.0 on FF in terme of light gathering capability. So around 3 times less than my Fuji setup. Not that bad (if my calculations are right) - Benh (talk) 17:36, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 17 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--MZaplotnik(talk) 09:22, 29 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Astronomy#Sky

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 4 Oct 2019 at 18:00:07 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Dayak Women
Confirmed results:
Result: 3 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /MZaplotnik(talk) 09:36, 29 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 6 Oct 2019 at 13:58:48 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Catterpillar in close-up
Thank you for nominating this image. Unfortunately, it does not fall within the Guidelines and is unlikely to succeed for the following reason: insufficient sharpness on main object --Kreuzschnabel 20:17, 27 September 2019 (UTC)[reply] Anyone other than the nominator who disagrees may override this template by changing {{FPX}} to {{FPX contested}} and adding a vote in support. Voting will then continue in the usual way. If not contested within 24 hours, this nomination may be closed.
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /MZaplotnik(talk) 16:39, 29 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 29 Sep 2019 at 09:58:59 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Maison Carrée in Nîmes, Gard, France
Confirmed results:
Result: 10 support, 1 oppose, 2 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 13:41, 29 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Religious buildings#France

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 29 Sep 2019 at 22:57:29 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • Note - just after I started this nom I made a couple of corrections, including nudging the white balance towards the cooler side as I felt it was a little warm before. This is now accurate to how it looked on the day. Anyone who viewed the nom right after I made it might need to clear their cache to view the new version. Cmao20 (talk) 23:13, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment Congratulations, Cmao20, for submitting your own work (as it seems to be the first FPC "all by you" if I'm not wrong). Well, in my view this tower is clearly a QI, and the light is good. However I'm a bit mitigated on the wow factor (that's subjective of course) as I don't see here a tremendous composition, nor an incredibly original subject. I'm not sure whether or not this one will become FP (I'd bet for no), but I'm personally convinced it is not an obvious one. Other opinions may differ of course. You'll see... good luck! -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:49, 21 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Thanks Basile. Yes, this is the first time I have submitted my own work at FPC, I will upload a few more of my images over the next few weeks although I'm not sure if I'll try them at FPC or at QIC. Your opinion is always appreciated, even if you don't support. Cmao20 (talk) 12:39, 21 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Oppose Hi Cmao, I'm with Basile basically. There's nothing wrong. It's properly taken and I guess it would pass QI assessment. But here is about "special" pictures, and I don't think that one is. Do you think it's a very special point of view? subject? Were the conditions special? If yes, then you did well to nominate. But to me it doesn't check any of these. And at an age when anyone can basically produce high quality picture, your picture has to stand out on other merits to get the stars here (well I guess, I'm not all the voters). Benh (talk) 15:03, 21 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Well, in response I'd say I nominated it because I felt that the perspective conveyed the height and immensity of the tower, and I felt that the light conditions were good that day. It also shows several important features of castle architecture from that time, included the arrowslits and the places where rooms would once have been constructed, and it shows the colour of the decorative yellow sandstone more clearly than any other image on Commons. But maybe these latter few are arguments for why it should be featured on ENwiki, not here. Thanks for your review anyway, it's always appreciated. Cmao20 (talk) 15:16, 21 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • I agree with you. Your reason would probably be better received at enFPC. And yes here is also a lot of personal point of view, which can get really frustrating from time to time (when you think you took the shot of your life and no one seems to agree). - Benh (talk) 15:31, 21 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Thanks for your review. Your point is fully understood, but I think the frame would look a bit empty if the adjacent walls weren't there. And of course in practice there's not really any way to get the image without including at least some of the surrounding walls. That said, it would be better if the window wasn't cut off, I agree - but I've visited this spot a few times and never managed to get a better shot than this one. Cmao20 (talk) 17:44, 29 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 7 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Cart (talk) 08:59, 30 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Castles and fortifications#United Kingdom